Highly Recommended awardBy delivering and in some cases exceeding the D800e's image quality, the Alpha A7r has become the quality leader in the non-medium format league. The fact it does this in a body that's half the thickness, half the weight and one third cheaper than a D800e is a remarkable achievement and allows me to easily award it my Highly Recommended rating for those who understand what it can and can't do. Watch out full-frame world: Sony's coming and it means business.

Buy it now!

Check prices at Amazon, B&H, Adorama, eBay or Wex. Alternatively get yourself a copy of my In Camera book, an official Cameralabs T-shirt or mug, or treat me to a coffee! Thanks!

Sony Alpha A7r review


The Sony Alpha A7r is a mirrorless system camera with a full-frame sensor. Announced in October 2013 alongside the more affordable A7, they are the World’s smallest and lightest full-frame mirrorless system cameras; note Leica has long offered its M series with full-frame sensors and interchangeable lenses, but they’re larger, heavier and manual focus only. Sony also has its own full-frame RX1 and RX1r compacts, but while they’re mirrorless, they don’t have interchangeable lenses.

The A7r and A7 are externally almost identical, with the only major difference being the sensor within: the more affordable A7 is equipped with a 24.3 Megapixel full-frame sensor with embedded phase-detect AF, while the more expensive A7r sports a 36.4 Megapixel full-frame sensor with the low pass filter removed (for potentially crisper results) but no phase-detect AF points. The full-frame sensors on both models are considerably larger than the APS-C and Micro Four Thirds sensors found in most mirrorless system cameras, allowing shallower depth of field effects at the same apertures and potentially superior noise and dynamic range performance. Like the NEX models though, there’s no built-in stabilisation, with the cameras instead relying on optically stabilised lenses to iron-out any wobbles.

Beyond their sensors, both models are virtually identical. The compact bodies look not dissimilar to the Olympus OMD models and offer a choice of a large XGA OLED viewfinder (roughly the same image size as the OMD EM1) or 3in tilting (non-touch) screen for composition, dust and moisture resistance, Wifi and NFC, the chance to download apps to expand the functionality, 1080p video at 24p / 25p, 60i / 50i or 60p / 50p, and up to 4k TV output over HDMI or Wifi. Bracketing is limited to three or five frames at up to 3EV or 2/3EV repsectively (but could be upgraded via a downloadable app), the maximum shutter is 1/8000, there’s microphone and headphone jacks, and focus peaking. With the promise of D800e quality in a considerably smaller and lighter package, the Alpha A7r has justifiably got a lot of people very excited, but can it live up to expectations? Find out in my Alpha A7r review where I’ll share in-depth comaprisons with the A7, Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800e!

Sony Alpha A7r review

Sony Alpha A7 / A7r overview video

At the official Sony press launch, I got my hands on an Alpha A7 and A7r and made this video to guide you through the new features! This video was filmed as a preview, but hopefully remains useful as a guide to the basics before you delve into my full review below and over the following pages!

Sony Alpha A7 / A7r preview

Sony Alpha A7r build quality and handling

The Sony Alpha A7r is styled like a mini DSLR with a combination of curves and flat angular surfaces which at first glance may look a little severe to some, but over time I became quite fond of the style.

Measuring 127x94x48.2mm and weighing 465g with battery and card, it’s surprisingly small and light especially when you consider the full-frame sensor within. Indeed it’s actually roughly the same size and weight as the Olympus OMD EM1 (130x94x63mm / 496g), although the EM1 is a little thicker thanks to a slightly a chunkier grip. Another revealing comparison is against the Olympus OMD EM5 which measures 121x90x42mm and weighs 425g with battery. Do remember though all Olympus bodies include built-in stabilisation which works with any lens you attach, whereas the Sony A7r does not. Here’s how it looks next to the older Olympus OMD EM5.

Sony A7r and Olympus OMD EM5

Place it next to a higher-end DSLR and the difference is dramatic. I hired Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800e bodies from in the US primarily for image quality comparisons with the A7r and A7, but was shocked to compare their size and weight against the new Alphas. The 5D3 measures 152x116x76mm and weighs 950g with battery, making it 3.1cm wider, 2.6cm taller and 3.4cm thicker, not to mention double the weight without a lens. Meanwhile the Nikon D800e measures 145x122x81mm and weighs-in at 1Kg with battery, making it 2.4cm wider, 3.2cm taller and around twice the thickness and weight. These two traditional DSLRs literally dwarf the A7r and A7 – you can get an impression of this in the comparisons below where I’ve pictured the A7r against the D800e.

Sony A7r and Nikon D800e from the front

Of course Sony’s no stranger to producing small bodies and the most important measurement is what you end up with when you mount a lens. As I’ll discuss later, there’s not a huge amount of native FE lenses to measure-up, but the two Zeiss primes which are most likely to end up on the A7r are well-proportioned with the body. The 35mm f2.8 adds little to the thickness and brings the weight to 773g. The 35mm is a particularly good match for the A7r. I really enjoyed shooting with this combination and loved how it could easily fit into my small camera bag – indeed I could be very happy with it and the 55mm as a light and classy twin lens kit, although the pair add the best part of two grand (USD) to the system price. Also remember the A7r does not have built-in stabilisation and neither do either of these prime lenses, so that’s a key advantage of the Olympus bodies to weigh-up. But the fact you can compare the size and weight of the A7r and A7 to higher-end Micro Four Thirds bodies when fitted with certain primes remains amazing. Place them next to a Canon or Nikon DSLR of this class with a similar lens and the difference is literally huge.

The A7r’s grip may be fairly small, but if you’re coming from another mirrorless camera you’ll find it just fine. I most commonly shoot with the slightly smaller Olympus OMD EM5, so found the grip on the A7r actually gave me more to hold onto. But again these are very compact bodies compared to traditional DSLRs, especially if you’re coming from a semi-pro model. If you’re down-sizing from something like a Canon EOS 5D Mark III or Nikon D800e you may prefer to fit the A7r with its optional battery grip which certainly gives you much more to hold onto, while still remaining smaller overall than the DSLRs.

At this point I should however note there’s pros and cons to having a small camera body. I love the portability of the A7r, but there’s no denying the sheer heft of a larger body can be easier to hold steady when shooting and can’t help but make you think more about your stance and technique.

Sony A7r and Nikon D800e from above

Once again I was shocked to remind myself just how big and heavy the 5D3 and D800 are, especially compared to the A7r, but again their size does encourage serious handling. Conversely I found when shooting with the A7r it was easy to fall into a more casual style, and while you can get away with that on smaller formats with stabilisation, there’s much less margin for error when shooting unstabilised with full-frame. Many of my more casual handheld snaps with the A7r were lacking sharpness either due to slightly missing the focus or wobbling a little from camera-shake, and I know under the same conditions I’d have nailed the shot with, say, an Olympus EM5 or EM1. The combination of a very high resolution sensor and unstabilised primes with a shallow depth of field means you should shoot carefully for the best results. The A7r body may look like an OMD EM5, but inside you’ve got something akin to the Nikon D800e and from my experience with that camera I only ever got the full 36 Megapixel goodness from it when shooting on a tripod. Of course you may be steadier or have better technique, I just wanted to point out this is not a casual camera.

The Alpha A7r may be small and light, but it feels very well built and confident in your hands. The shell is built from magnesium alloy and the entire camera is weather-proofed. To what degree neither Sony nor I can say, but I did use it with the (also weather-sealed) Zeiss 55mm f1.8 out in a steady shower with no ill effects.


Interestingly while the Alpha A7r and the A7 look and feel virtually identical, there are minor differences in their construction. The A7 shell for example isn’t entirely made from magnesium alloy, instead employing an enhanced plastic front panel to reduce the cost a little; strangely this actually makes the A7 a tad heavier too. Look really closely and you may also notice the mode and exposure compensation dials on the top of the A7r are furnished from solid aluminium with a slightly different texture compared to aluminium plating on the A7. But to be honest I couldn’t tell any difference between the way they felt once they were in my hands. I did several blind tests, and at no point could I or anyone else I asked tell the difference between the cameras by look or touch alone.

Both cameras share the same control system which works very well. Separate finger and thumb dials fall easily to hand, and there’s an additional rear wheel which means you can adjust the shutter, aperture and ISO quickly and easily. Suffice it to say you can also customize the dials and some of the buttons too. There’s also a separate exposure compensation dial which again gives you quick and easy access.

Also personal – but I’m sure to be appreciated by everyone – is the new menu system, finally laying the bizarre approach of the NEX models to rest. In their place is a tabbed non-scrolling set of pages not dissimilar to Canon’s menu system which is so much better than what Sony previously offered. It’s easy to overlook this on reviews which concentrate on the specifications, but in use the new user interface makes a massive difference to the handling experience.

So far so good, but when shooting with the A7r I found myself regularly cursing Sony for not equipping it or the A7 with touch-screens. If you’ve never used a touch screen, you may wonder what the fuss is about, but when it comes to selecting a focusing point they can’t be beaten. As it stands if you want to manually position a focusing area on the A7r, you’ll need to press the Function button and choose the focus area option (or configure a custom button to take you straight there), then use the controls to reposition it as desired. Almost inevitably I’d often find myself off by a small amount and having to go through the process again just to adjust it a little, or recomposing the shot so the subject fell below the fixed area. Very frustrating when you’re used to just tapping once and getting the desired result on models like the Panasonic and Olympus bodies.

I should also mention the tilting screen which may be great if you shoot from behind the camera in the landscape orientation, but is of little use if you either shoot in the portrait orientation or take self portraits or film pieces to camera. If the screen was fully articulated, you’d be able to compose with comfort in the portrait shape and film pieces to camera which makes video blogging so much easier. To be fair none of Canon or Nikon’s full-frame cameras even have tilting screens, so it is at least a step ahead of them, but Sony fans will remember full articulation has been seen before on the SLT models.

The Alpha A7r is powered by an NP-FW50 which Sony reckons is good for around 270 images under CIPA standards. In my tests I generally found a single charge got me through a fairly heavy day, although if you’re shooting really heavily or including a lot of video, then you’ll want to carry a spare.

The A7r’s battery can be charged as normal using an optional mains-powered unit, but in what’s probably a first for a camera of its class, you can also charge the battery in-camera over a USB connection. This is something I’ve seen on plenty of smaller cameras, but not on any interchangeable lens models I can think of, let alone full-frame ones. I think it’s a brilliant feature and one I certainly exploited during my tests. After one long day of shooting I got a fully depleted battery up to 82% by connecting it to a vehicle’s USB port during a two hour drive and continued shooting when I reached my destination. It’s quite liberating being able to recharge – or at least topup – a battery over USB with a laptop or car charger adapter without the need for extra accessories. It’s a key benefit of the A7r over its rivals right now.


The A7r does not have a built-in flash, but it does have a standard hotshoe including Sony’s Multi Interface Shoe contacts to support the company’s range of accessories. The A7r is also equipped with USB and Micro HDMI ports, along with 3.5mm microphone input and headphone jacks. The A7r also sports built-in Wifi with NFC, which allows wireless transfer of images and supports the company’s selection of optional apps to expand its capabilities, more of which later. The HDMI port can be configured to output a 4k signal for compatible TVs, allowing you to view your photos at a higher resolution, but note video is still captured and played back at a maximum of 1080p. The HDMI output can also be configured to deliver a clean feed without any graphics, and in a particuarly neat move for anyone using an external recorder, the HDMI feed remains clean and unscaled even if you’re using magnified assistance on the camera’s screen; impressively the HDMI output also includes audio. Interestingly the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, while ultimately delivering video that’s bereft of moire, mirrors the HDMI output with any screen-based assistance and does not include audio on the feed either, forcing anyone with an external recorder to take a seperate audio feed. These all prove that Sony is thinking carefully about the needs of video professionals, although note my friends who are experts in these fields have commented they have not yet been able to record a 1080p feed over HDMI, only 1080i. That said, the inetrnal AVCHD encoding for 1080p looks pretty good for most requirements.

There’s an optional RM-VPR1 cable release which is also compatible with a variety of other Sony models, although you can also remote trigger the camera over Wifi using a smartphone since the Smart Remote app is permanently embedded in the A7 and A7r.

Finally there’s a single memory card slot in the right grip side, that’s compatible with SD cards (class 4 or faster) and Sony’s Memory Stick Duo. Yes, two slots would have been nice for redundancy or backup, but I guess in a camera of this size, every cubic millimeter counts.

Sony Alpha A7r viewfinder and screen

The Sony Alpha A7r is a 100% Live View camera with the choice of a screen or electronic viewfinder for composition. The viewfinder is one of the best electronic models I’ve had to pleasure of using. It employs an OLED panel with XGA resolution (1024×768 or 2.359 million dots) and a large 0.71x magnification. This places it roughly on par with the Olympus OMD EM1 in size and resolution, although the native 4:3 aspect ratio of the Olympus means its images fill the panel and appear taller.

In use the Sony viewfinder didn’t suffer from any tearing or rainbow artefacts – something I’m very sensitive to – and the image was always large, bright and very detailed. I had the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800e alongside me while testing the A7r and can tell you their optical viewfinders were pretty much exactly the same size, so if you’re considering a switch you won’t lose anything in image size or coverage.

Of course there’s pros and cons to electronic viewfinders. On the downside they can’t help but become noisier or slower to refresh in very dim conditions, and the time taken to display an electronic image means they often lag in a continuous shooting environment. This makes them less desirable for very low light and fast action shots. But it’s not all one sided. The advantage of electronic composition is the ability to overlay guides, offer magnified focusing assistance and peaking, preview changes in white balance or effects, not to mention filming movies and playing back video or photos. It’s an entirely personal choice, but for me the benefits of electronic viewfinders now outweigh optical ones for my work, and again the A7r and A7 are equipped with one of the best around.


If you prefer you can compose with the 3in / 921k dot screen. As mentioned earlier the screen can tilt to face directly upwards or down at an angle making overhead or waist-height shooting more convenient. But annoyingly it’s not fully articulated, preventing the same benefits to shooters in the portrait shape. Lack of full articulation also means you can’t fold the screen back on itself for protection or towards the subject for self-portraits or filming pieces to camera.

As you’ve probably gathered by now I’m a big fan of fully articulated screens, and it frustrates me when a camera is only equipped with a tilting screen, although I should note neither the Canon EOS 5D Mark III nor Nikon D800e even have tilting screens. I was also disappointed Sony didn’t make the screen touch-sensitive either as I find this such a quick and easy way to manually position AF areas. For me this is a key advantage of other systems.


Pressing the DISP button cycles through a selection of up to five different information views, each super-imposed onto the live image: you can have up to three different views of the shooting information from detailed to none at all, along with a live histogram or a dual axis leveling gauge, although not at the same time. The DISP button menu lets you choose which of the five views you’d like enabled, and very neatly you can separately configure them for the screen and viewfinder – there’s no restrictions. The main screen also offers an extra view which replaces the live image with a page full of shooting information including both a live histogram and a leveling gauge, all on the same page – this has to be the most useful and detailed single shooting information screen I’ve seen.

While focusing in Live View with both Sonys and the two DSLRs, I also noticed the A7 / A7r image when magnified was cleaner and more detailed than the Nikon D800(e), albeit not as clean as the Canon EOS 5D Mark III. So if you’re coming from the Nikon you’ll find it easier to focus in live view when magnified, but Canon owners may notice a small drop in the magnifed live image quality.

Sony Alpha A7r lens mount

The Alpha A7r is equipped with an E-mount that’s compatible with existing E-mount lenses for NEX cameras along with a new range of FE lenses that are designed for full-frame use. The camera does not feature built-in stabilisation, so to iron-out any wobbles you’ll need optically-stabilised lenses.

Sony launched the A7r and A7 with five native FE lenses, all of which are weather-sealed and feature internal focusing for quick and quiet operation: a 28-70mm f3.5-5.6 stabilised and kit zoom, a Carl Zeiss 24-70mm f4 stabilised zoom, the Carl Zeiss 35mm f2.8 and 55mm f1.8 primes, and the 70-200mm f4 G telephoto zoom with stabilisation.

The two primes are fairly compact, as are the two general-purpose zooms – indeed the use of five aspherical elements and a shorter flange distance allow the Zeiss 24-70mm f4 to be smaller than Canon’s 24-70mm f4.

Note at the time of launch, the 28-70mm was only available in a kit with the cheaper A7, while the 24-70mm, 55mm and 70-200mm weren’t expected in significant volume until early 2014. This means the only native lens available for the A7r at launch could be the Zeiss 35mm f2.8, but luckily this is a compact and high quality lens that’s great for general-purpose use, albeit not exactly bright or cheap at around $800 USD. Sony promises up to ten new native FE lenses in 2014 including an f4 ultra wide Zeiss zoom, a fast Zeiss prime and a G-series macro.

Five native lenses is a fairly modest start, especially as a number of them aren’t available at launch, but the key benefit of the A7r and A7 are their ability to use lenses from other systems.


For starters, there’s Sony’s own E-mount lens catalogue for their NEX system. These mount on the A7r and A7 without the need for an adapter, although of course are only corrected for a smaller APS-C frame. If you mount one on the A7r, the camera defaults to a crop mode, delivering the same field-of-view as an APS-C camera with a 1.5x coverage reduction and a maximum resolution of 15 Megapixels. So if you’re upgrading from a NEX 6, you can use all your existing lenses and capture images with essentially the same resolution, although owners of the NEX 7 will have to accept a big reduction on image size with their older E-mount lenses.

In a welcome move though, you can turn off the crop mode and have the A7r capture the entire 36 Megapixel full frame area when using older E-mount lenses – there’ll be significant vignetting and softening in the corners, but the usable frame could extend beyond the APS-C area, especially if you’re into making square crops. Here’s what you’d get if you fit the Zeiss 24mm f1.8 E-mount lens to the A7r in a portrait taken by my friend DL Cade of PetaPixel – thanks for letting me use the photo!


1/60, f5, 2000 ISO, Sony Zeiss 24mm f1.8 for NEX

Photo credit: DL Cade / PetaPixel

Another popular NEX lens is the Sony 10-18mm f4 ultra wide zoom. I mounted it on the A7 and took a series of handheld photos at 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18mm. You can download the original files by clicking each picture below.

Sony 10-18mm f4 for NEX mounted on A7 body
Sony 10-18mm at 10mm f8   Sony 10-18mm at 12mm f8   Sony 10-18mm at 14mm f8
    Sony 10-18mm at 16mm f8   Sony 10-18mm at 18mm f8

At 10mm there’s significant vignetting as you’d expect, but the usable area extends well beyond the border of the APSC frame. You can make a square crop using the full height of the frame and only just dip into the first, fainter, vignette towards the edge of the imaging circle. Yes, the image gets quite soft towards the edge of the circle, but for smaller reproductions or subjects where you’re not concentrating on detail at the edges it is surprisingly usable. Note some of the softness on the left side on all the samples here is due to the depth of field, so for a fairer evaluation be sure to check the right side too.

Zoom the lens into just 12mm and the periphery of the imaging circle has virtually disappeared with just the faintest vignetting in the corners visible. Again the detail softens towards the corners, but it’s not that bad; I’ve certainly seen some so-called full-frame lenses perform similarly.

Between 13 and 15mm any evidence of the outer imaging circle edge disappears with no vignetting to comment on. There’s still softness in the extreme edges and corners, but again I’d say the usable area extends way beyond the APSC frame.

At 16mm there’s the faintest evidence of vignetting, heralding the return of the imaging circle’s edge, and by 18mm it’s become quite dark in the extreme corners once more, although not by as much as at 10mm. But I’d say the lens at 18mm performs best of all at the extreme edges, further extending the usable area.

I’d say this is an excellent result for the Sony 10-18mm lens. Mount it on a full-frame body and you’ll be capturing enormously wide fields of view, which actually manage to avoid vignetting between 13 and 15mm, and which show only minimal evidence of corner darkening at 12 and 16mm. At the extreme ends of the focal range, especially the wide-end, the imaging circle’s edge becomes quite visible, but there’s still enough clearance for a square crop.

Of course don’t expect miracles: the detail becomes progressively softer beyond the APSC area, but so long as you’re not pixel-peeping at 100% the results are surprisingly good. If you view or print at smaller sizes, or of course shoot compositions that don’t require pin-sharp detail in the corners, then it can be a fun option while we wait for the planned Zeiss ultra wide f4 zoom.

Meanwhile you could alternatively mount one of the ultra wide zooms from a third party via an adapter, such as the Canon EF 17-40mm f4L, EF 16-35mm f2.8L, Nikkor 14-24mm f2.8, or of course Sony’s own 16-35mm f2.8 A-mount lens. I have examples of the last two coming up in just a moment! But before that here’s a different view of the Sony 10-18mm at 10mm on an A7. You can view the same subject at 12mm, 14mm, 16mm and 18mm.


1/60, f4, 400 ISO, Sony 10-18mm f4 at 10mm

Sony Alpha A7 with Sony 10-18mm sample image at 10mm f4
Click image to access original at Flickr

You can also mount any of Sony’s existing A-mount lenses via one of two adapters. The simpler LA-EA3 supports leisurely contrast-based AF only on both the A7r and the A7, while the pricier LA-EA4 includes the semi-transparent mirror technology of Sony’s SLT cameras, effectively equipping both the A7r and A7 with a small array of phase-detect AF points when using these lenses. This AF system over-rides the existing on-chip PDAF system of the A7.

These adapters open up a broader lens catalogue including a number of high quality options that are corrected for full-frame use, and the more sophisticated LA-EA4 effectively lets you use them on the A7r with phase-detect AF as well. I tried the A7r with a selection of A-mount lenses via the LA-EA4 and found it focused fairly swiftly and confidently for single AF acquisition, but I enjoyed less luck using the 70-400mm f4-5.6 G SSM telephoto zoom with Continuous AF, attempting to track hand-gliders take off and land. I admit to being a bit disappointed by my lack of success here as continuous AF should be one of the strong points of the SLT AF system.

That said, the LA-EA4 may have been a pre-production adapter and there’s also the possibility of a calibration error with the mirror in the adapter and this particular sample of the lens. Sony’s anticipated the latter and equipped both the A7r and A7 with AF micro-adjustment options, allowing you to eliminate calibration errors, although I didn’t get the chance to put these to the test during my initial time with the cameras. I hope to retest the combination of the A7r and LA-EA4 with Alpha lenses, as if it can be configured to work well, then it could eliminate one of the camera’s weaknesses: relatively slow AF that’s ineffective in a continuous environment.


8.22MB, Aperture Priority, 1/320, f8, 100 ISO, Sony 16-35mm f2.8 ZA SSM at 16mm

Sony Alpha A7r with Sony 16-35mm f2.8 sample image
Click image to access original at Flickr

I should however note that while the simpler LA-EA3 passes all the light through (since it doens’t have the LA-EA4’s semi-transparent mirror), it should only be considered by those with a great deal of patience for autofocusing. I tried it with Sony’s 16-35mm f2.8 ZA SSM and 70-200mm f2.8 SSM lenses on both the A7r and A7 and found the contrast-based AF system searched back and forth for between four and seven seconds before it finally locked-on. So if you want snappier AF with Alpha lenses, you’ll definitely want to go for the LA-EA4 instead, and accept the light loss of the SLT mirror path.

Sony A7r with Nikkor 14-24mm

But the unique combination of a full-frame sensor in a mirrorless body give the A7r and A7 many more options outside of Sony’s own lens catalogues. The short flange to sensor distance has of course been exploited by many mirrorless cameras to date to adapt lenses from multiple systems but most have cropped the image due to their smaller format sensors.

Now with a full-frame sensor the A7r and A7 can use Canon, Nikon, Leica, Contax and just about any other lens without a crop, allowing them to deliver their intended coverage. Of course you’ll need an adapter and their capabilities vary, but I had a chance to try out a variety of adapters for Nikon, Canon and Leica lenses.

Starting with Nikkor lenses, I tried the Novoflex adapter which may be completely manual but surprisingly quick in use.

I tried it with the Nikkor 14-24mm f2.8 ultra wide lens and used a combination of magnified live view and focus peaking for assistance. Meanwhile a lever allows the adapter to adjust the aperture blindly, although if you keep your eye on the camera’s metering you can estimate each stop as a 1EV difference. Here’s a photo I took with the combination.


9.7MB, Manual, 2 secs, approx f8, 80 ISO, Nikkor 14-24mm at 14mm

Sony Alpha A7r with Nikkor 14-24mm sample image
Click image to access original at Flickr



6.5MB, Aperture Priority, 1/100, f4, 800 ISO, Canon EF 24-105mm at 105mm

Sony Alpha A7r with Canon EF 24-105mm sample image
Click image to access original at Flickr

Moving onto Canon lenses, I used the Metabones Smart Adapter III – this version is necessary to support full-frame coverage as earlier adapters are only suitable for cropped sensors. The Smart Adapter III is the complete opposite to the Novoflex, offering pretty much fully automatic operation with Canon EF lenses as if you were using a Canon DSLR.

You can electronically control the aperture using the camera in any exposure mode, along with exploiting autofocus and image stabilisation; all the EXIF information from the lens is also passed to the camera and stored in the images.

I took the photo opposite handheld using the 24-105mm at 105mm and the optical stabilisation allowed me to easily hold it steady at 1/100 even though the position wasn’t particuarly comfortable and I was wobbling. I have several other samples from the 24-105mm in my A7r sample images gallery and impressively the optical resolution is sufficient for the more demanding 36 Megapixels of the A7r.

Like the LA-EA3 adapter for Alpha lenses, the Smart Adapter will only let the A7r and A7 autofocus using a contrast based system, but in my tests with the EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM, it generally locked-on in three to four seconds.

This not only makes it comfortably quicker than using Alpha lenses via Sony’s own LA-EA3 adapter, but only a tad slower than focusing in Live View on Canon’s DSLRs. As such if you’re used to composing and focusing in Live View using a Canon DSLR, say for landscape or architectural shooting, you’ll find the transition to a Sony A7r or A7 very easy with the Smart Adapter III. Obviously the Canon AF is still faster when composing through the viewfinder, but again many more considered photographers compose and focus in Live View and don’t mind waiting a couple of seconds for a lock.

Next up I tried the A7 and A7r with two Leica Summicron lenses, the 35mm f2 and the 50mm f2, via a Metabones M mount adapter. Unsurprisingly you’ll be shooting lenses like these completely manually for focus and exposure, but the experience is actually surprisingly quick and enjoyable. Thanks to magnified views when composing, it’s easy to nail the focus even with the apertures wide open, and an effective technique involves getting the focus close then simply rocking a little back and forth until the subject comes into sharp focus. I borrowed the Leica lenses and adapters from Hireacamera, which is a fantastic UK-based rental firm; if you’re based in the US, I’d recommend BorrowLenses – both are great for trying out new or exotic gear before buying.


6.22MB, Manual, 1/1250, f2, 100 ISO, Leica Summicron 50mm f2

Sony Alpha A7r with Leica Summicron 50mm f2 sample image
Portrait by Guy Thatcher from UK rental firm, Hireacamera. Click image to access original at Flickr

I think there’s a lot of Leica owners who adore their lenses, but perhaps are wondering what to do in terms of a body upgrade. If they’re the types who enjoy and exploit newer technologies, the Sony bodies represent an interesting option for their existing lens collections, especially the A7r which lets them capture high resolution 36 Megapixel images. I would however point out that neither of the Sony shutters could be described a quiet or discreet, so if you’re a Leica street shooter, you may still prefer your existing body. That said, I reckon the Summicrons look pretty cool mounted on a Sony body, as shown below – what do you think? I also have a selection of shots taken with the Leica lenses on my sample images page. I’ve also provided some shots for comparison between various 35mm options, and those considering the native Zeiss 35mm f2.8 may be interested to discover it out-performed the mighty (and considerably more expensive) Summicron 35mm f2 in the corners and edges on my test composition when both were set to f8. Not bad considering the Zeiss is cheaper and of course supports autofocus on the Sony bodies.

Sony Alpha A7r with Leica Summicron 35mm f2   Sony Alpha A7r with Leica Summicron 50mm f2
Portraits by Guy Thatcher from UK rental firm, Hireacamera

So while the native FE lens catalogue at launch is limited, there are loads of opportunities to fit the A7r and A7 with legacy and third party lenses via a wealth of adapters, and again its lack of sensor crop gives them a unique advantage in the market. Imagine if Sony had also managed to include built-in IS in the A7r and A7, allowing them to not only enjoy uncropped access to such lenses, but with stabilisation too. We can but hope for future generations.

Note if you intend to use the A7r or A7 with specific third party lenses via an adapter, I’d strongly recommend trying to find someone online who’s already tested them for compatibility or issues. I can tell you about the specific combinations above, but if you’re wondering about other options – partiuclarly if they’re very wide or bright primes – you should search to see if anyone else has used them.

Sony Alpha A7r focusing

The Sony Alpha A7r employs a 100% contrast-based autofocusing system. This is one of the major differences between it and the cheaper A7 which additionally offers embedded phase-detect AF points for subjects in a central frame, falling back to a contrast-based system for the border around it. Interestingly the 100% contrast-based system of the A7r makes it fairly unusual in the current mirrorless world as most cameras apart from Micro Four Thirds models (the Olympus EM1 excluded) offer a hybrid system with phase-detect AF assistance.

The A7r splits most of the frame into 25 areas which can be automatically selected in the Multi Point mode. Zone and Center-weighted options are also available, as is the opportunity to manually place an AF area almost anywhere on-screen using the rocker controls; this Flexible Spot mode also allows you to resize the AF area as Small, medium or Large. The AF system works down to 0EV light levels.

As a full-time Live View system, the A7r can support technologies like face detection, which Sony now complements with optional eye detection. Like Olympus bodies before it, this allows the camera to first frame a face before then locking-onto the closest eye. The implementation is a little different between them though, and despite their recent investment in Olympus, Sony engineers assured me this was their own developed technology. So on the A7r the eye isn’t selected automatically – instead you’ll need to press and hold the button in the middle of the rear wheel to fire-up the system, after which a small AF area is placed over the nearest eye on the primary detected face. I found the Olympus system quicker as when enabled it simply locks onto the eye without additional button presses, but I still appreciate the its presence on the A7r as it makes casual portrait shots much easier.

There’s the choice of Single Shot AF, Continuous AF, Direct Manual Focus, or Manual Focus modes, and magnified assistance at 7.2x and 14.4x, the latter roughly offering a 1:1 view on-screen. The A7r also offers focus peaking with three level settings and the choice of white, red or yellow fringing to indicate sharp focus. It is possible to use focus peaking while filming video.


I initially tried the Alpha A7r with the Zeiss 35mm f2.8 and Zeiss 55mm f1.8 lenses. In Single Shot AF under good light, the A7r fitted with either lens took about half a second to lock-onto the subject and in dimmer conditions around one second. Sometimes under dimmer conditions or with a smaller focusing area size there was visible hunting, not always resulting in a successful lock. For example in the composition I used for my low light high ISO tests, the A7r consistently failed to lock perfectly onto the subject, forcing me to shoot in manual focus.

In Continuous AF mode the A7r also struggled to stay locked on a moving subject. I tried at first with moving vehicles, then simply with a friend walking purposefully towards me over a distance of about 10-2m, but in either case the A7r delivered less than a 30% success rate.

For comparison I performed the same tests with the Alpha A7. If the subject were outside the phase-detect AF area, the performance was essentially the same as the A7r. If the subject were within the phase detect area though, the A7 felt faster and more confident in good light, but again in dimmer conditions took as long as a second to confirm focus.

In a Continuous AF environment the A7 unsurprisingly performed better so long as the subject was within the phase-detect AF area. Under those conditions the hit rate increased over the A7r, but it was still far from the kind of success you’d expect from shooting with the optical viewfinder on a DSLR. And once again if the subject fell in the border outside the phase-detect area, the A7’s performance was effectively the same as the A7r.

I had high hopes for the AF with A-mount lenses fitted via the LA-EA4 as this effectively bypasses the camera’s own AF system in favour of the adapter’s built-in SLT system – this uses a semi-transparent mirror to drive a traditional phase-detect AF system and should therefore allow the A7r and A7 to focus as well as Sony’s SLT cameras.

As discussed in the lens section above though, I didn’t enjoy a great deal of success shooting with the Sony 70-400mm SSM G lens on the A7r via the LA-EA4 adapter in Continuous AF mode. Most of my shots of moving subjects were slightly out of focus, although this could have been down to a pre-production adapter or a calibration error with the lens and adapter. Sony offers AF Microadjustment just for this purpose and once I have the camera back for testing at a later date I’d like to try these tests again.

But in my tests so far I’d say autofocus is the most disappointing aspect of the A7r. It’s a little quicker than, say, most older Canon or Nikon DSLRs in Live View, but compared to the EOS 70D or most mirrorless cameras, it feels slow and lacking in confidence. I had an Olympus OMD EM5 with me while testing the A7r and A7 and in Single AF mode it would lock onto subjects almost instantly, and also operated more confidently in lower light too. The latest Panasonic mirrorless cameras are even better still in low light, confidently focusing in much dimmer conditions down to -3EV. Now to be fair, they have smaller sensors with lower resolutions and lenses with larger inherent depth-of-fields which all make focusing much easier than a 36 Megapixel full-framer – but when you’re taking photos of a subject in less than perfect conditions you don’t really care about the format, only the response and result.

I should also mention that most mirrorless cameras have failed to impress me so far when it comes to continuous AF. Some do it better than others, but the fact is none offer anywhere near the speed and confidence of the phase-detect AF systems in the optical viewfinders of traditional DSLRs. So while the A7 is definitely better than the A7r in terms of speed and continuous AF, at least in the area covered by the PDAF points, I’d say neither camera is suited to action photography where the subject is moving towards or away from you. They’re not sports cameras, and the A7r’s AF system in my tests only ever felt truly happy given a static subject in good light with loads of detail to lock onto.

On a more positive note there’s lots of assistance if you prefer to shoot in manual focus, or are using third party lenses via an adapter. You can magnify the view by 7.2 or 14.4x, the latter delivering around a 1:1 / 100% view on-screen. In side-by-side tests with the A7r / A7, Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800e, I found the Canon still delivered the cleanest, most detailed image in magnified Live View, but the Sonys weren’t too far behind and all of then were much more usable than the noisy and low detail of the magnified Live View image on the Nikon D800e.

There’s also focus peaking at a choice of three levels and in three colours. In my tests I had lots of opportunity to try out focus peaking, both with native FE mount lenses and third party options via adapters, but I found a coloured fringe didn’t always correspond to a pin-sharp subject. Indeed I frequently had to make minor adjustments to the focus to completely nail the result, despite peaking assuring me all was well. This particularly applies if you’re viewing the whole image on-screen and not a magnified view.

I wonder whether focus peaking is something that works best on the more forgiving resolution of video? Maybe the precision demanded by 36 Megapixel full-frame and a very shallow depth of field is a step too far for it. Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate its inclusion on the A7r, but while it proved useful in my tests it was more a guide than a 100% reliable technique. Again this is based on my tests so far and further evaluation may reveal better results – watch this space.

Sony Alpha A7r shooting modes

The Sony Alpha A7r’s mode dial offers the usual PASM shooting modes, along with AUTO (actually two Autos via an on-screen option), SCN (accessing nine presets via an on-screen menu), Sweep Panorama, two custom memory presets and the Movie mode. You can start filming video in any shooting mode, but by first turning the dial to the Movie position you can frame in the selected video format (such as 16:9 for HD) and also adjust more settings.

The camera has access to shutter speeds between 1/8000 and 30 seconds with a Bulb option. The flash sync is 1/160, compared to 1/250 on the A7. Fairly basic bracketing is available with three frames at increments between 1/3 and 3EV or five frames in increments of 1/3 to 2/3EV. The A7r is also compatible with Sony’s optional downloadable apps which can extend its capabilities. At the time of writing Sony reckoned only Smart Remote Control (already embedded in the camera) and Direct Upload (for posting direct to social networks) were compatible, but I’d expect the others to be updated where necessary including the Bracket Pro app. As far as I understand this doesn’t offer any deeper exposure bracketing yet, but the fact you can install apps to expand the capabilities of the camera is very cool, especially now the API is open for third party developers.

At this point I’d like to mention the sound of the shutter – something I rarely discuss in reviews, but something that lots of folk have been asking about. The Alpha A7r’s shutter isn’t particularly loud, but it is an unusually long drawn-out sound compared to other models, including the Alpha A7. Unlike the A7r, the A7 actually employs an electronic first-curtain, so while the shutter volume is similar to the A7r, the sound is shorter in two parts like a ‘ther-clik’. In contrast the A7r shutter is mechanical on both curtains so can’t help being longer. Sadly neither camera has a silent 100% electronic shutter option. I know electronic shutters can have issues with rolling shutter artefacts, but unless the effect is horrendous I still like to have the option for situations like weddings or in galleries.

I had the Canon 5D Mark III and Nikon D800e on hand while testing the A7 and A7r, so had a chance to compare their respective shutter sounds. Both of these traditional DSLRs were actually a bit louder, with the Canon also sounding sharper and the Nikon a little lower pitched. But crucially they were both much faster sounds, which gave them the impression of being faster, more responsive cameras, almost hungry for the shot, whereas the Sonys, especially the A7r, sounded much more leisurely almost like they were lolloping along.

Now this is entirely personal and you may disagree or even laugh at my description above, but while testing the A7 and A7r with a group of photographers, most of us commented on their shutter sounds, so if you’re sensitive about this you’ll definitely want to check them out first.

I’ll continue discussing the other shooting modes and effects in part two of this review coming soon! Time now to discuss other aspects of the camera.

Sony Alpha A7r movie mode

The Sony Alpha A7r is equipped with very capable movie recording facilities. It can record Full HD 1080 video at 60p / 50p, 60i / 50i or 24p / 25p, there’s full manual control over exposures, it can continuously autofocus while filming, there’s active focus peaking while recording, adjustable audio level meters, jacks for an external microphone and headphones, uncompressed (and clean) HDMI output, and of course as a full-time Live View system you can compose, film and playback using the screen or electronic the viewfinder.


Set the A7r to 60p / 50p (depending on region) and it’ll encode at a high rate of 28Mbit/s. Set it to 60i / 50i (depending on region) and you have the choice of encoding at 24 or 17Mbit/s. Set it to 24p / 25p (depending on region) and you can choose between 24 and 17Mbit/s. Unlike Canon and Nikon’s DSLRs, the frame rates are regionally-dependent, so PAL regions won’t have access to 60p, 60i or 24p, while NTSC regions won’t have access to 50p, 50i or 25p – I do hope Sony addresses this in a firmware update. All of the modes above are encoded using AVCHD, but you can alternatively choose MP4 at either 1440×1080 at 12Mbit/s (stretched for playback into 1080p) or VGA at 3Mbit/s. The maximum recording time is approximately 29 minutes, but a 2GB file limit for MP4 means you’ll need to be shooting in AVCHD for longer clips.

The HDMI output can also be configured to deliver a clean feed without any graphics, and in a particuarly neat move for anyone using an external recorder, the HDMI feed remains clean and unscaled even if you’re using magnified assistance on the camera’s screen; impressively the HDMI output also includes audio. Interestingly the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, while ultimately delivering video that’s bereft of moire, mirrors the HDMI output with any screen-based assistance and does not include audio on the feed either, forcing anyone with an external recorder to take a seperate audio feed. These all prove that Sony is thinking carefully about the needs of video professionals, although note my friends who are experts in these fields have commented they have not yet been able to record a 1080p feed over HDMI, only 1080i. That said, the inetrnal AVCHD encoding for 1080p looks pretty good for most requirements.

I’m working on further tests for video on the A7r for an update to this review soon, along with preparing many more samples but right now I wanted to share a small selection of clips which give you an idea of the quality and features in practice. In my tests so far I’m finding the A7r delivers fairly clean results, albeit with some visible moire at times. Many speculated the A7 would be better at video than the A7r, but in my tests below it’s roughly the same in terms of noise and detail, although at times moire is actually more visible on the A7 video than the A7r; conversely the A7 does enjoy an advantage in a continuous AF environment thanks to its embedded phase detect AF points. The Canon EOS 5D Mark III remains the quality leader with cleaner and crisper video, suffering from zero moire in all of my samples. Meanwhile the Nikon D800e is the worst of the four, suffering from similar levels of moire as the two Sonys, but with worse noise and lower detail.

Sony Alpha A7r sample video at 60p: outdoors with 35mm f2.8
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
This clip shows the A7r’s video under ideal conditions with bright light and fixed focus. I used the Zeiss 35mm f2.8 lens at f8, and set the video quality to 1080 / 60p

Sony Alpha A7r sample video at 60p: continuous AF (pulling) with 55mm f1.8
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
This clip demonstrates the continuous focusing capabilities of the Alpha A7r. I fitted it with the Zeiss 55mm f1.8 and opened the aperture fully. I then set the focus to continuous and pointed it between a nearby tree and the forest beyond, waiting for the focus to catch up with each adjustment; apologies for the wobbly footage as this was handheld without stabilisation. Normally continuous AF proves to be a challenge for 100% contrast based AF systems, but while the A7r can hardly be described as swift or quick off the block in this regard, it does at least refocus on the desired areas smoothly, quietly and with minimal hunting. I’d say this is a fair result. I should however note that the A7 under the same conditions was noticeably more confident with quicker response and less hunting, so long as the subject fell within its phase-detect AF area.

Sony Alpha A7r sample video at 50p: manual focus pulling with Leica Summicron 35mm f2
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
In this clip I mounted a Leica Summicron 35mm f2, set the aperture to f2, then manually pulled-focus between the foreground and background, using a magnified view for assistance.

Sony Alpha A7r sample video at 24p: low light at 1600 ISO
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
To test the low light video capabilities of the A7r I filmed a series of clips in dim conditions between 800 and 25600 ISO using the Zeiss 35mm lens and a tripod. For comparison I filmed the same scene with the same lens with the A7 moments later, followed by the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800, the latter pair fitted with 35mm f1.4 lenses from each company. In each case the lenses were stopped to f2.8 unless otherwise stated and all clips were filmed in 1080 / 24p. The clip here was filmed at 1600 ISO, but I also have versions at 800 ISO, 3200 ISO, 6400 ISO, 12800 ISO and 25600 ISO.

Sony Alpha A7 sample video at 24p: low light at 1600 ISO
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
Here’s my version of the low light scene filmed with the Alpha A7. Some speculated it would deliver superior quality to the A7r, but judging from these clips I’d say there’s little to nothing in it. Both share similar noise levels, similar degrees of detail and also similar amounts of moire suggesting that one isn’t superior at scaling than the other. The clip here was filmed at 1600 ISO, but I also have versions at 800 ISO, 3200 ISO, 6400 ISO, 12800 ISO and 25600 ISO.

Canon EOS 5D Mark III sample video at 24p: low light at 1600 ISO
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
Here’s my version of the same scene filmed with the Canon EOS 5D Mark III. This is the camera to beat for video and, well, the Alpha A7r doesn’t. The EOS 5D Mark III is consistently cleaner, crisper, and thanks to its exact down-sampling suffers from no moire either. So while the A7r and indeed the A7 outperform its still photo quality, the 5D3 remains the video camera to of choice, especially coupled with its silent control options; if only Canon would equip it with a fully-articulated touchscreen too. The clip here was filmed at 1600 ISO, but I also have versions at 800 ISO, 3200 ISO, 6400 ISO, 12800 ISO and 25600 ISO.

Nikon D800e sample video at 24p: low light at 1600 ISO
Download the original file (Registered members of Vimeo only)
Here’s how the Nikon D800e handles the same scene, and as expected it performs worse than the Canon EOS 5D Mark III in terms of noise, detail and moire. How about against the two Sonys? I’d say all three suffer from moire to roughly the same extent, but the Sony A7r and A7 enjoy a little more detail and lower noise. So of the foursome the D800e is the least good for HD video. The clip here was filmed at 1600 ISO, but I also have versions at 800 ISO, 3200 ISO, 6400 ISO, 12800 ISO and 25600 ISO.

Sony Alpha A7r continuous shooting

The Sony Alpha A7r offers two continuous shooting options, continuous at 1.5fps and Speed Priority at 4fps. The Alpha A7 shoots at 2.5fps or 5fps in the same modes. To put them to the test I fitted each with a freshly-formatted Sony 32GB UHS-1 card and set them to 1/500 in Shutter Priority with a 400 ISO sensitivity. In each case I used Speed Priority and their maximum respective resolutions, 36 Megapixels for the A7r and 24 Megapixels for the A7.

Set to Large Fine JPEG, the A7r fired-off 23 frames in 5.54 seconds, corresponding to a speed of 4.15fps, after which it reduced to around 2fps. Set to RAW only the A7r captured 17 frames in 4.13 seconds, corresponding to a speed of 4.11fps. And finally when set to RAW+JPEG Fine it captured 15 frames in 3.49 seconds, corresponding to a rate of 4.29fps. So in each case the A7r essentially met or slightly exceeded its maximum quoted speed of 4fps regardless of the image format, although for bursts limited to 15-23 frames.

Set to Large Fine JPEG, the A7 fired-off 94 frames in 18.69 seconds, corresponding to a speed of 5.02fps, and seemed happy to keep shooting until I ran out of memory. Set to RAW only the A7 captured 30 frames in 5.89 seconds, corresponding to a speed of 5.09fps. And finally when set to RAW+JPEG Fine it captured 25 frames in 4.78 seconds, corresponding to a rate of 5.23fps. So in each case the A7 essentially met or slightly exceeded its maximum quoted speed of 5fps regardless of the image format and thanks to its smaller image size could shoot for longer bursts, especially for JPEG only.

Compare these speeds to the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800(e) which in my tests delivered just over 6fps and just over 4fps respectively, the latter set to capture the full image size. So in terms of continuous shooting the A7r roughly matches the D800(e) while the A7 is only slightly out-performed by the EOS 5D Mark III by about 1fps which doesn’t make a huge difference in practice. Of course none of these cameras are designed for sports or action and all of the manufacturers offer faster models if that’s your thing. It’s also worth noting the Olympus OMD EM1 offers 10fps without AF or 6.5fps with AF, although of course it’s shifting much smaller 16 Megapixel files.

Sony Alpha A7r Wifi and NFC

The Sony Alpha A7r is equipped with Wifi, allowing it to transfer images wirelessly to smartphones, tablets, computers or compatible TVs. You can also use Wifi to remote control the camera with your smartphone or tablet, and unique to Sony so far, download and install optional apps to extend its capabilities.


The A7r is also equipped with NFC, or Near Field Communications, allowing the initial Wifi negotiation to be simplified to a single tap with compatible handsets like the Samsung Galaxy S3 and S4, the Google NEXUS 4, 7 and 10, or Sony’s latest phones.

While testing the A7r I regularly used the Wifi to transfer images to my Galaxy S4, and then send them on for sharing. It was also nice to be able to take photos of other people and use the Wifi to get the images on their own phones straightaway – I found myself doing this more than I expected. I haven’t had a chance to try copying images to a computer or TV over Wifi with the A7r yet, but believe it requires both the camera and the device to be connected to the same wireless access point. If you want a peer-to-peer connection directly between the camera and a device it’ll have to be an iOS or Android device.

The A7r also follows the NEX 5R, 5T and 6 to support downloadable apps to extend its capabilities. Sony offers a number of apps on its Play Memories service, some free, some costing a few dollars, and recently opened the API to allow third party development. At the time of writing, there were 17 apps available on the Play Memories Camera Apps page, but only three were compatible with the A7r: Smart Remote Control (which lets you control the camera with your smartphone), Direct Upload (for sharing images direct to certain social networks) and Flickr-add on (for uploading images direct to Flickr); all three of these are free of charge and the Smart Remote Control already comes pre-installed in the camera.

I’m hoping the remaining apps, which include more advanced bracketing and timelapse facilities, can be made compatible soon as the A7r is lacking in some of these capabilities compared to rival cameras. Either way the ability to extend the feature-set in this way is very welcome and remains unique in the market.

I’ll expand this section when I get a chance to try out more of the apps on the camera.

Sony Alpha A7r sensor

There’s a lot that’s remarkable about the Sony A7r, but its headline feature is without a doubt squeezing a high-resolution full-frame sensor into a compact mirrorless body. The sensor is also one of the main differences between the A7r and the cheaper A7.


The Alpha A7r is equipped with a 35.9x24mm full-frame sensor with 36.8 Megapixels, delivering images with a maximum resolution of 7360×4912 pixels. The Alpha A7 is equipped with a full-frame sensor measuring 35.8×23.9mm with 24.7 Megapixels, delivering images with a maximum resolution of 6000×4000 pixels. When output at 300dpi, the A7r and A7 can make prints measuring 24.5×16.4in and 20×13.3in respectively. Both cameras offer a sensitivity range of 100-25600 ISO, expandable at the low end to include 50, 64 and 80 ISO options.

The A7r’s resolution matches that of the Nikon D800(e) exactly, while the A7 slightly out-resolves the Canon EOS 5D Mark III at least on numbers. The 5D3 offers 22.3 Megapixel files measuring 5760×3840 pixels which can be reproduced at 19.2×12.8in. So there’s not much between the A7 and 5D Mark III in pixel count.

Have we seen the A7r and A7 sensors before, perhaps in the D800e and Alpha A99 respectively? No, say the Sony engineers I quizzed, the A7r and A7 both employ brand new sensors.

There’s more differences between the A7r and A7 beyond just resolution though. The A7r dispenses with the optical low pass filter for potentially crisper results (albeit with potential moire you’d need to manage yourself), while the A7 sports embedded phase-detect AF points in a central frame to aid focusing, especially in a continuous environment.

Both the A7r and A7 sensors employ offset microlenses towards the corners to help compensate for the angle of light coming from wide lenses mounted at such a shallow flange distance, but in an additional difference the A7r also employs gapless microlenses, whereas the A7 does not.

Sony also notes both cameras employ adaptive sharpening to compensate for diffraction and more faithful reproduction especially on edges thanks to the new BIONZ X image processor.


That’s a boatload of technology and differences I’ve provided you with, but the as always the proof of the pudding is in the eating, so without further ado, let’s check out some results. I’ve compared the quality, detail and noise of the A7r against the A7 and to see if they can really hold their own against their biggest full-frame rivals, I’ve also provided full comparative results against the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800e. I think you’ll be impressed.

Check out my Sony A7r vs A7 quality, Sony A7r vs A7 noise, Sony A7r vs Canon 5D Mark III noise, Sony A7r vs Nikon D800e noise, my Sony A7r sample images, or skip straight to my verdict!

Buy Gordon a coffee to support cameralabs!

Like my reviews? Buy me a coffee!

Follow Gordon Laing

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2022 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Website design by Coolgrey