The crops are taken from the original images, saved as High Quality JPEGs in Photoshop CS2 and presented here at 100%. Each number represents 100 lines per picture height (lpph), so a figure of 20 means a resolution of 2000 lpph.

This result is identical to the E-410, which isn’t surprising, since both cameras share the same sensor and image processor, and we also fitted each body with the same 14-42mm kit lens to avoid manufacturing variations. Fit the Olympus body with a higher quality lens and you’ll enjoy slightly higher resolution. As with the E-410, we measured a fractional improvement when using the Leica D 14-50mm zoom.

The big difference between the E-510 and E-410 results below though are their default image processing settings. Since we believe most people will use their cameras with their default image processing settings, that’s what we use for testing and comparison. As such, the E-510 and E-410 were tested here using their Natural and Vivid Picture Modes respectively.

Natural mode is clearly not as punchy as Vivid and appears to deliver softer results, but this is mostly down to sharpening and contrast levels. Upon close inspection, the E-410’s result doesn’t actually contain any extra detail, but if you prefer punchier output direct from the camera, you should set the E-510 to its Vivid mode. If you prefer to apply enhancements in software later, you may find the default Natural mode more appropriate.

The bottom line though is the E-510, like the E-410, is capable of resolving a great deal of detail with its kit ED 14-42mm lens – indeed it’s equivalent to the best 10 Megapixel DSLRs we’ve tested. Note the Olympus bodies do have a technical advantage here though as their 4:3 aspect ratio means they enjoy a slightly higher vertical resolution than models with a more traditional 3:2 aspect ratio. This test chart measures lines per picture height, so vertical resolution is key.