Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9

Quality

Sony Cyber-shot TX9 vs Nikon COOLPIX S80 vs Panasonic Lumix FX700 High ISO Noise

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise

Support this site by
shopping below

 

To compare noise levels under real-life conditions we shot this scene with the Sony Cyber-shot TX9, the Nikon COOLPIX S80 and the Panasonic Lumix FX700 within a few moments of each other using their best quality JPEG settings at each of their ISO sensitivity settings.

All three cameras were set to Program Auto exposure mode and the lenses were set to approximate the same field of view and ISO was manually set.

The above shot was taken with the the Sony Cyber-shot TX9 in Program mode with the lens at a wide angle setting of 6.3mm (35mm equivalent). The ISO sensitivity was set to 125 ISO and the exposure was half a second at f3.5. The crops are taken from the area marked with the red square and presented below at 100%.

The first thing to say about the Cyber-shot TX9’s low light performance is that it’s quite difficult to make out much detail in the shadow regions of the images from which our crops are taken. The Cyber-shot TX9 hasn’t under-exposed the image – the histogram is in the middle with no shadow clipping – and, although half a stop more exposure would have produced a better result without highlight clipping, the Cybershot’s exposure is good enough. None of which changes the fact that there isn’t a lot of detail in the shadows.

There’s plenty of detail in the stone column on the right though, at least at the 125 ISO setting. At 200 ISO you can already begin to see the softness creeping in but, while there’s a marginal difference between these two lower ISO sensitivity settings you’d be hard pressed to spot it other than if you were looking closely at 100%.

At 400 ISO there’s a step change with the edge of the column starting to break up and a very noticeable drop in the amount of detail in the stonework. 400 ISO is probably the maximum sensitivity setting you’d want to use for ‘good quality’ shots, anything beyond that is going to be a victim of quite intrusive noise. At the 1600 and 3200 ISO setting the noise is so overwhelming that, unless the subject is very close to your heart, you’re not going to be too interested in the results.

Compared with the Nikon COOLPIX S80, the most obvious difference is that the S80 has done a much better job of retaining tonal detail in the shadows – even though the exposure was very similar. On that basis alone and regardless of noise you’d have to hand it to the COOLPIX S80. As with the outdoor test, the COOLPIX noise crops appear to show better detail, but also look over-processed. In spite of that, we think the COOLPIX S80 has the edge, with better control of noise and retention of image detail all the way up the scale. And it goes a long way up, with 3200 and 6400 ISO settings, albeit at reduced resolutions.

Like the Cyber-shot TX9 the Lumix FX700 has failed to retain tonal detail in the shadows, despite selecting a very similar exposure to the the other two cameras. The Lumix FX700 results are also quite cold in terms of colour balance. Right from the off at 100 ISO the Lumix FX700 crops are lacking in detail and look very processed and for that reason we’d put the Lumix FZ700 in third place behind the Nikon COOLPIX S80 and sony Cyber-shot TX9.

To an extent, these higher ISO settings are only really of academic interest, Sony has included them because it can, rather than because they’re particularly useful. For good results in low light you’re nearly always better off using the Anti Motion Blur or Hand-held Twilight scene modes. These take a rapid sequence of six shots and produce a composite image. For comparison purposes we’ve included below crops taken at the same time in the same conditions using both of these scene modes alongside the 400 ISO program Auto mode crop. It’s disappointing to note that neither of these composite modes has managed to get any more shadow detail than the Program auto mode in this particular composition, but both the examples below exhibit lower noise levels than their equivalents taken in Program at the same sensitivity.

Sony Cyber-shot TX9
Program mode
Sony Cyber-shot TX9
Anti Motion Blur
Sony Cyber-shot TX9
Hand-held Twilight
f3.5, 0.5s 400 ISO
 
f3.5, 1/40s 3200 ISO
 
f3.5, 1/8s 500 ISO

Now head over to our Sony Cyber-shot TX9 gallery to see some more real-life shots in a variety of conditions.

Sony Cyber-shot TX9
 
Nikon COOLPIX S80
 
Panasonic Lumix FX700
80 ISO Not available
80 ISO
80 ISO Not available
125 ISO
100 ISO
100 ISO
200 ISO
200 ISO
200 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
3200 ISO
3200 ISO (3M)
3200 ISO (High Sens scene mode)
6400 ISO Not available
6400 ISO (3M)
6400 ISO Not available


Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise

Sony Cyber-shot TX9 vs Nikon COOLPIX S80 vs Panasonic Lumix FX700 Real-life resolution

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise

 
Support this site by shopping below

 

To compare real-life performance when zoomed-out, we shot this scene with the Sony Cyber-shot TX9, the Nikon COOLPIX S80 and the Panasonic Lumix FX700 within a few moments of each other using their best quality JPEG settings.

The lenses on each camera were set to approximately the same field of view and all three were set to Program mode with the ISO sensitivity manually set to the lowest available setting.

The above image was taken with the Sony Cyber-shot TX9 in Program Auto mode. The lens was zoomed to 6.3mm (35mm equivalent) and the metering selected an exposure of 1/200th of a second at f4.5 with the sensitivity at 125 ISO. The original 4000 × 3000 pixel image had a file size of 4.92MB. The crops are taken from the areas marked with red rectangles and are presented here at 100%.

Our test scene usually poses something of an exposure challenge for compact sensors, but on this particular day with bright, but overcast weather conditions the scene lacks its usual wide dynamic range. The Cyber-shot TX9 has nonetheless got the exposure spot on with the histogram forming a neat hump in the middle of the x axis, tapering at either end with no clipping of highlight or shadow detail. The colour balance is good and, despite the flat lighting conditions, colours are vibrant and natural-looking.

Looking at the detail crops, the results overall from the Cyber-shot TX9 look very promising. There’s a slight overall softness, but the degree is slight and fine detail is well resolved. Arguably, the edges could be a little sharper, but one problem the TX9 doesn’t suffer from is over processing – these crops are very natuaral looking with no graininess, edge halos or other evidence of heavy handed image processing.

The results are fairly consistent across the frame with image detail at the edges looking as good as in the centre. There’s the faintest hint of color fringing around the window frame in the third crop and this is something you’d need to watch out for, particularly with backlit subjects, but most of the time you’d be unlikely to spot it unless you were looking out for it.

The Cyber-shot TX9 crops make an interesting comparison alongside those from the Nikon COOLPIX S80. The COOLPIX S80 crops are more contrasty and at first glance look sharper than those from the Cyber-shot TX9. Closer inspection however, reveals a clumpy, granular look to the COOLPIX crops – they look more processed and less natural than those from the Cyber-shot TX9. The COOLPIX S80 edge crop, the third one down, also looks markedly softer than the others.

The crops from the Panasonic Lumix FX700 don’t fare very well by comparison with the Sony Cyber-shot TX9. Like the COOLPIX S80, they have a clumpy, granular look, only on the Lumix FX700 crops it’s much more noticeable. In fact, in places image detail has disappeared altogether – the crosses on the chapel roof in the first crop are very indistinct and the lighthouse in the second crop has disappeared altogether.

Now let’s see how they compare at higher sensitivities in our High ISO Noise results.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9
 
Nikon COOLPIX S80
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700
f4.5, 125 ISO
f3.6, 80 ISO
f4, 100 ISO
f4.5, 125 ISO
f3.6, 80 ISO
f4, 100 ISO
f4.5, 125 ISO
f3.6, 80 ISO
f4, 100 ISO
f4.5, 125 ISO
f3.6, 80 ISO
f4, 100 ISO


Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise

Buy Gordon a coffee to support cameralabs!

Like my reviews? Buy me a coffee!

Follow Gordon Laing

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2022 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Website design by Coolgrey