Support Cameralabs by shopping at my partner stores or buying me a coffee!
Buy me a coffee!

Follow my RSS feed at Camera Labs RSS Feed
  Latest camera reviews

Lumix G80 / G85
Olympus OMD EM1 II
Sony RX10 Mark III
Sony RX100 Mark V
Nikon COOLPIX B700
Sony A6500
Lumix FZ2000 / FZ2500
Nikon COOLPIX B500
Lumix LX10 / LX15
Fujifilm XT2
Nikon D3400
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Ricoh GR II
Canon G7X Mark II
Canon SX720 HS
Canon EOS 80D
Olympus TG Tracker
Nikon D500 review
Canon EOS 1300D / T6
Lumix GX80 / GX85
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X70
Lumix TZ80 ZS60
Sony A6300
Canon PowerShot G5X
Lumix TZ100 ZS100
Sony A7s Mark II
Sony RX10 II
Lumix FZ330 / FZ300
Sony RX100 IV
Canon G9X
Fujifilm XT10
Nikon COOLPIX L840
Canon SX530 HS
Olympus OMD EM10 II
Canon SX410 IS
Panasonic Lumix GX8
Olympus TOUGH TG860
Sony A7r Mark II
Canon PowerShot D30
Olympus TOUGH TG4
Canon PowerShot G3X
Canon EOS 5Ds
Nikon COOLPIX S9900
Sony HX90V
Canon EOS T6s 760D
Panasonic Lumix G7
Panasonic Lumix SZ8
Canon EOS M3
Olympus EPL7
Samsung NX3000
Panasonic Lumix GM5
Nikon D5500
Panasonic Lumix GF7
Olympus OMD EM5 II
Nikon COOLPIX S9700
Canon SX710 HS
Panasonic TZ70 / ZS50
Sony Alpha A7 Mark II
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Fujifilm X100T
Nikon COOLPIX S3600
Sony Alpha A5100
Sigma DP1 Quattro
Sony Cyber-shot W830
Nikon COOLPIX L830
Nikon D750
Canon SX400 IS
Sony Cyber-shot H400
Panasonic Lumix LX100
Canon SX60 HS
Canon ELPH 340 IXUS 265
Canon G7X
Nikon COOLPIX P530
Canon SX520 HS
Canon G1 X Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Panasonic TZ60 / ZS40
Sony RX100 III review
Sony A3000 review
Canon EOS 1200D T5
Sony WX350
Nikon P600
Sony Alpha A5000
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V
Panasonic Lumix GH4
Panasonic TS5 FT5
Sony Alpha A6000
Canon SX700 HS
Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TOUGH TG2
Nikon AW1
Nikon D3300
Fujifilm XT1
Olympus STYLUS 1
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Olympus OMD EM1
Panasonic Lumix GM1
Nikon D610
Sony Alpha A7
Nikon D5300
Canon PowerShot A2500
Sony Alpha A7r
Canon ELPH 130 IXUS 140
Nikon COOLPIX P520
Nikon COOLPIX L820
Canon PowerShot S120
Panasonic Lumix GX7
Canon SX510 HS
Canon PowerShot G16
Fujifilm X20
Panasonic FZ70 / FZ72
Canon EOS 70D
Sony RX100 II
Canon ELPH 330 IXUS 255
Panasonic Lumix GF6
Fujifilm XM1
Olympus EP5
Panasonic Lumix LF1
Panasonic TZ35 / ZS25
Olympus XZ2
Sony HX300
Panasonic Lumix G6
Sony HX50V
Fujifilm X100S
Canon SX280 HS
Canon EOS SL1 / 100D
Panasonic TZ40 / ZS30
Nikon D7100
Fujifilm X-E1
Canon EOS 6D
Nikon D5200
Panasonic Lumix GH3
Canon PowerShot S110
Panasonic Lumix G5
Sony NEX-6
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Nikon COOLPIX P7700
Olympus E-PL5
Canon EOS M
Panasonic TS20 / FT20
Canon PowerShot G15
Nikon D600
Nikon COOLPIX L810
Canon PowerShot D20
Sony RX100
Panasonic Lumix LX7
Canon SX500 IS
Fujifilm HS30 EXR
Sony HX200V
Panasonic FZ60 / FZ62
Canon 520HS / 500HS
Canon 110HS / 125HS
Nikon D800
Canon EOS T4i / 650D
Canon PowerShot A3400
Panasonic ZS15 / TZ25
Olympus E-M5
Nikon D3200
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Canon PowerShot A2300
Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Nikon D7000
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D

All camera reviews
  Best Buys: our top models
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikon lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories

Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join my Camera forum and let everyone know!
  DSLR Tips

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W200 Gordon Laing, August 2007

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W200 Verdict

When Sony announced the 12.1 Megapixel Cyber-shot W200, it was hard not have a pre-conceived impression of what it would offer in practice. It’s probably fair to say most of us expected an otherwise great compact, let down by the overly ambitious resolution of its sensor. In reality though, we found the opposite was often the case.

Sony W200 front angle view Sony W200 rear angle view

The W200’s sensor really can resolve a great deal of detail, and while there’s inevitably a loss in quality at higher sensitivities, it’s nowhere near as bad as some models we’ve tested recently. Just take a look at our W200 Real-life Noise Results and you’ll see the Sony actually delivers fairly respectable performance, even at 400 ISO. Head over to our W200 Sample Images and you’ll also see 800 ISO is acceptable for smaller prints. We’d expected the worst from the sensor, but in reality it was actually pretty good.

Had Sony then coupled the sensor with the best features in today’s compacts, it would have had a winning product, but instead the W200 employs some surprisingly average choices in components and operation. First the lens which with a bog-standard 3x, 35-105mm range, offers nothing more exciting than compacts produced years ago. Everyone recognises the benefits of 28mm coverage, so let’s have it, or at least a slightly longer 4x range to justify the price.

Sony W200 LCD screen

Then there’s the operation and controls. It’s great to have manual control over exposures, focus, sharpness and contrast, but where’s the custom white balance and why only offer one JPEG setting? As for the menu system, some may like it, but we found it very confusing.

Probably the biggest insult though is the 115k pixel screen which simply looks very coarse compared to the more common 230k pixel screens found elsewhere. Sure, 115k is understandable on entry-level compacts, but surely a 12.1 Megapixel model deserves something better. So while the optical viewfinder is a nice addition, it doesn’t make up for the screen.

So what you have a compact with good looks, great build quality, and a sensor which performs much better than expected, but one that’s let down by a budget screen, often confusing controls and a pedestrian lens range. And it has to be said, the W200 ain’t exactly cheap. So how does it compare with the competition?

Compared to Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX100


More 12 Megapixel compacts have since announced, but at the time of writing, the only other model on the market was Panasonic’s Lumix DMC-FX100. We’ve not tested this model, so can’t comment on image quality, but it costs the same as the W200 and has several key advantages. The lens offers genuine 28mm wide angle coverage and its slightly longer 3.6x range means it zooms-in to virtually the same degree as the W200. The screen may not be a 230k model, but with 207k pixels, it looks much better than the W200’s 115k model.

Beyond this though it’s swings and roundabouts comparing features. The Sony has greater manual control, an optical viewfinder, musical slideshows and optional HDTV connectivity, while the Panasonic has widescreen movie capabilities and an arguably more intuitive menu system. For us though the wider lens and superior screen for the same money makes it a compelling alternative.

Compared to Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX30


The FX30 may ‘only’ have 7.2 Megapixels, but it was the last compact we tested at Cameralabs and the one we’ve used for many of the W200’s comparisons in this review – so how does it measure-up? Most obviously it’s 5 Megapixels behind the W200, and there’s certainly a noticeable difference in resolving power. The W200 also boasts superior performance at higher sensitivities which is impressive given its higher resolution, and there’s an optical viewfinder, manual control over exposures, along with a range of accessories which are probably unparalleled for any compact.

In the FX30s favour though, its lens offers 28mm coverage and a slightly longer 3.6x range, along with a 207k pixel screen which simply looks much better. Like most Panasonic compacts, it also boasts widescreen movies, an arguably more intuitive user interface – but most crucially of all, it comes in about 30% cheaper than the W200. See our Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX30 review for more details.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W200 final verdict

Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-W200 is certainly not a cheap compact. This is partly understandable given the 12.1 Megapixel sensor, but sadly it’s not reflected across the rest of the specifications. Sure the optical viewfinder, manual control and wide range of accessories are nice to have, but for many people they won’t make up for the entry-level screen and average zoom range.

Had Sony fitted a higher resolution screen and equipped the W200 with wider angle capabilities, the story would have been very different, but as it stands you have a camera where most of your money seems to be devoted to the sensor. To be fair, the sensor is actually surprisingly good, out-resolving every other compact we’ve tested while not overly compromising noise levels, but you’ll have to weigh up for yourself whether it makes up for otherwise average features.

Don’t get us wrong – the Sony W200 is a good-looking and well-built compact capable of generating some very impressive results, but ultimately we feel it’s let down by its relatively high price and otherwise average specifications. For the money - and its position in Sony's range - it’s hard to forgive a pedestrian 35-105mm range and 115k screen. Had these been improved, or the price lowered, the W200 would have been easy to recommend. But unless you absolutely want a compact with 12.1 Megapixel resolution and the Sony badge, there’s alternatives which offer a more compelling overall package. To see the W200's highlights, check our W200 video tour.

Good points
Very high resolution images.
Optical viewfinder.
Manual control over exposure.
Huge range of accessories.

Bad points
Softness and fringing in corners.
Pedestrian 35-105mm lens range.
Screen looks relatively coarse at 115k pixels.
Convoluted menu system and controls.

(relative to 2007 compacts)

Build quality:
Image quality:


18 / 20
16 / 20
14 / 20
15 / 20
14 / 20


If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2017 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ Best Cameras / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs