Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Sony Cybershot DSC-W220
Canon PowerShot G11
Canon IXUS 95 / SD1200IS
Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Olympus 'PEN' E-P1
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FS25
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony Cyber-shot W270/290
Canon PowerShot A2100IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Canon IXUS 980 / SD990IS
Nikon D3x
Panasonic Lumix GH1
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro DSLRs
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Sony Vario-Sonnar T* DT 16-80mm f3.5-4.5 ZA Gordon Laing, August 2007

More results : Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

Support this site by shopping via these links

 
 
 



 
Sony DT 16-80mm vs Sony DT 18-70mm wide-angle uniformity comparison

To compare the vignetting and light fall-off of the Sony DT 16-80mm against the DT 18-70mm at their shortest focal lengths, we photographed a white target with a highly diffused filter; each lens was focused to infinity with its aperture wide open. The images were then analysed with Imatest and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution. Bigger percentages are better.

Light falls off to 53.4% of the maximum when it reaches the corners of the Sony DT 16-80mm when it's zoomed-out to 16mm. This is measurably worse than the 63.3% of the kit lens when it's zoomed-out. So you may notice slight darkening in the corners of some wide angle shots taken with the DT 16-80mm, although again to be fair it's roughly the same as Canon's EF-S 17-85mm while boasting wider coverage.

Sony DT 16-80mm
Using Sony Alpha A100
Sony DT 18-70mm
Using Sony Alpha A100
Sony 16-80mm at 16mm f3.5
Sony 18-70mm at 18mm f3.5
16-80mm at 16mm f3.5
Mean corner fall-off: 53.4 %
18-70mm at 18mm f3.5
Mean corner fall-off: 63.3%


Sony DT 16-80mm vs Sony DT 18-70mm telephoto uniformity comparison

To compare the vignetting and light fall-off of the Sony DT 16-80mm against the DT 18-70mm at their longest focal lengths, we photographed a white target with a highly diffused filter; each lens was focused to infinity with its aperture wide open. The images were then analysed with Imatest and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution. Bigger percentages are better.

With the DT 16-80mm zoomed-into its longest focal length, the light falls-off to 71.8% of the maximum in the corners. The kit lens beats it comfortably in this respect, although the DT 16-80mm has a longer range and a brighter maximum aperture when zoomed-in; you're also unlikely to notice any light fall-off with it in practice when zoomed-in. Now for some real-life results, let's head on over to our Sony DT 16-80mm sample images.


Sony DT 16-80mm
Using Sony Alpha A100
Sony DT 18-70mm
Using Sony Alpha A100
Sony 16-80mm at 80mm f4.5
Sony 18-70mm at 70mm f5.6
16-80mm at 80mm f4.5
Mean corner fall-off: 71.8 %
18-70mm at 70mm f5.6
Mean corner fall-off: 87.7%

Sony DT 16-80mm lens results

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting



Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


USA readers



 

UK readers
Jessops discount voucher




All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home