Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Sigma DP1 Gordon Laing, June 2008

Sigma DP1results : Outdoor resolution / Studio resolution / Real life Noise

Support this site by shopping via these links

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Sigma DP1 resolution comparison

  To measure and compare the Sigma DP1's resolving power we photographed the Enhanced Digital Camera Resolution Chart with it and a number of rival cameras, each using their best quality JPEG and default image tone and sharpening settings. Each lens was tested at every aperture setting and the best result selected for this page.

The crops are taken from the original images, saved as High Quality JPEGs in Photoshop CS2 and presented here at 100%. Each number represents 100 lines per picture height (lpph), so a figure of 20 means a resolution of 2000 lpph.

Note: just before going to press with this review, Sigma released firmware revision 1.03 which added a new LOW 50 ISO option, so we reshot this test and have presented the results below - although in terms of resolved detail, it was no different to the 100 ISO shot.

The Sigma DP1's relatively low 4.69 Megapixel output is responsible for the larger than average area shown in the crops below, but there's still a respectable degree of detail in the image. You'll also notice that while there are patches where the converging lines become blurred, the DP1's Foveon X3 sensor avoids the moiré patterns associated with conventional Bayer pattern sensors as they approach their limiting resolution.

These blurred portions actually start as low as 1400 lpph, but are followed by patches of perfectly resolved detail. So we're giving the DP1 the benefit of the doubt and scoring it here at the last point you can resolve the lines as being separate: this gives the DP1 1750 lpph of horizontal and vertical resolution respectively.

This is unsurprisingly lower than the other cameras shown here as their higher pixel density allows them to achieve a higher spatial resolution. But when it comes to colour resolution and avoiding colour artefacts, the DP1's X3 sensor technology is superior. Either way though, not a bad result for a camera outputting 4.69 Megapixel images.

As explained on the previous page, the DP1 comes with RAW processing software which offers an interpolated mode with 13.9 Megapixels, so to see how this measures-up, scroll down to the bottom of the page. Alternatively if you can't wait to see how it's sensitivity performance compares, head straight over to our DP1 noise results page.


Sigma DP1
Canon EOS 450D / XSi
with EF-S 18-55mm IS
1750 lpph, 16.6mm at f5.6, 50 ISO
2200 lpph, EF-S 18-55mm IS at 35mm, f8, 100 ISO

Canon PowerShot G9
 
Panasonic Lumix FX500
2250 lpph, 7.4-44.4mm at 15mm, f4, 80 ISO
2100 lpph, 4.4-22mm at 10mm, f4.5, 100 ISO


Sigma DP1
Canon EOS 450D / XSi
with EF-S 18-55mm IS
1750 lpph, 16.6mm at f5.6, 50 ISO
2225 lpph, EF-S 18-55mm IS at 35mm, f8, 100 ISO

Canon PowerShot G9
 
Panasonic Lumix FX500
2250 lpph, 7.4-44.4mm at 15mm, f4, 80 ISO
2150 lpph, 4.4-22mm at 10mm, f4.5, 100 ISO


Sigma DP1 Studio resolution: JPEG versus RAW

We photographed the chart immediately afterwards using the DP1's RAW mode (annoyingly it doesn't offer a RAW plus JPEG option). The RAW file was then processed using Sigma's supplied Photo Pro software, using the default settings, although we exported the image using the Large 13.9 Megapixel option. This interpolates the image and allows us to really see how much detail is captured by the system.

The interpolated RAW image is certainly very smooth and ideal for outputting at larger print sizes, but it doesn't contain any greater detail than the JPEG. Once again, blurred patches occur from 1400 lpph onwards, followed by small windows where the lines are perfectly resolved. And as before, the highest resolution where the lines remain separate is at around 1750 lpph.

So we'd say while the 13.9 interpolated output from RAW files will avoid jaggies on large prints, it won't manage to eek out any additional detail over the JPEG original. Now let's see how performs at different sensitivities on our DP1 noise results page.


Sigma DP1 JPEG
Sigma DP1 RAW (13.9 Large output)
1750 lpph, 16.6mm at f5.6, 50 ISO
1750 lpph, 16.6mm at f5.6, 50 ISO

Sigma DP1 JPEG
Sigma DP1 RAW (13.9 Large output)
1750 lpph, 16.6mm at f5.6, 50 ISO
1750 lpph, 16.6mm at f5.6, 50 ISO


Sigma DP1 results continued...

Outdoor resolution / Studio resolution / Real life Noise


Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


USA readers

 
UK readers


All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs