Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Panasonic Lumix TZ10/ZS7
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon PowerShot A3100IS
Olympus 'PEN' E-P2
Nikon COOLPIX S570
Canon IXUS 200 / SD980IS
Canon IXUS 120 / SD940IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A550
Nikon COOLPIX L20
Canon PowerShot A1100IS
Canon PowerShot S90
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Panasonic Lumix GF1
Canon PowerShot G11
Canon IXUS 95 / SD1200IS
Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Nikon D5000
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Canon EOS 1000D / XS

All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Canon lenses
Nikkor lenses
Sony lenses
Budget DSLRs
Mid-range DSLRs
Semi-pro DSLRs
Point-and-shoot compacts
Superzoom / top compacts
Camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC lens review Gordon Laing, July 2006


 



 



 

Coverage, wide angle with Nikon D2X

All three lenses on test claim the same 18-200mm focal length, but it's always worth putting this to the test. To compare actual coverage we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other; the camera was mounted on a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their widest 18mm focal length.

At first glance the three lenses on test appear to deliver identical wide-angle coverage, but look closer and there's subtle differences. The Tamron 18-200mm actually delivered a fractionally wider view at 18mm than the others, followed closely by the Nikkor, and finally the Sigma.

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
Nikkor AF-S DX VR 18-200mm 3.5-5.6G IF-ED
Tamron AF18-200mm F3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD IF
Sigma 18-200mm lens at 18mm
Nikkor 18-200mm lens at 18mm
Tamron 18-200mm lens at 18mm
18-200mm at 18mm (27mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 18mm (27mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 18mm (27mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)


Coverage, telephoto with Nikon D2X

Next up came the telephoto-end of each lens. Again to compare actual coverage we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other; the camera was mounted on a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their longest 200mm focal length.

Here all three lenses performed similarly, although upon close examination, the Nikkor's field was fractionally tighter than the others. In practice though it's fair to say all three lenses deliver essentially the same field of views.

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
Nikkor AF-S DX VR 18-200mm 3.5-5.6G IF-ED
Tamron AF18-200mm F3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD IF
Sigma 18-200mm lens at 200mm
Nikkor 18-200mm lens at 200mm
Tamron 18-200mm lens at 200mm
18-200mm at 200mm (300mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 200mm (300mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 200mm (300mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)

Note: both the Sigma and Tamron lenses were fitted with zoom lock switches to prevent their barrels from extending beyond the 18mm focal length while in transit. That said neither barrels of the models on test could be described as loose, and it was possible to zoom-in to 200mm on both, point vertically upwards and not suffer from any creep back down. The Nikkor lens didn't have a lock, but could be pointed up or down without suffering from discernable creep.


 
Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores
     
USA readers

 
UK readers
Jessops discount voucher

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2010 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home