Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Sony Cybershot DSC-W220
Canon PowerShot G11
Canon IXUS 95 / SD1200IS
Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Olympus 'PEN' E-P1
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FS25
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony Cyber-shot W270/290
Canon PowerShot A2100IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Canon IXUS 980 / SD990IS
Nikon D3x
Panasonic Lumix GH1
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro DSLRs
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC lens review Gordon Laing, July 2006


 



 



 

Coverage, wide angle with Nikon D2X

All three lenses on test claim the same 18-200mm focal length, but it's always worth putting this to the test. To compare actual coverage we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other; the camera was mounted on a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their widest 18mm focal length.

At first glance the three lenses on test appear to deliver identical wide-angle coverage, but look closer and there's subtle differences. The Tamron 18-200mm actually delivered a fractionally wider view at 18mm than the others, followed closely by the Nikkor, and finally the Sigma.

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
Nikkor AF-S DX VR 18-200mm 3.5-5.6G IF-ED
Tamron AF18-200mm F3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD IF
Sigma 18-200mm lens at 18mm
Nikkor 18-200mm lens at 18mm
Tamron 18-200mm lens at 18mm
18-200mm at 18mm (27mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 18mm (27mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 18mm (27mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)


Coverage, telephoto with Nikon D2X

Next up came the telephoto-end of each lens. Again to compare actual coverage we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other; the camera was mounted on a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their longest 200mm focal length.

Here all three lenses performed similarly, although upon close examination, the Nikkor's field was fractionally tighter than the others. In practice though it's fair to say all three lenses deliver essentially the same field of views.

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
Nikkor AF-S DX VR 18-200mm 3.5-5.6G IF-ED
Tamron AF18-200mm F3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD IF
Sigma 18-200mm lens at 200mm
Nikkor 18-200mm lens at 200mm
Tamron 18-200mm lens at 200mm
18-200mm at 200mm (300mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 200mm (300mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)   18-200mm at 200mm (300mm equivalent using Nikon D2X)

Note: both the Sigma and Tamron lenses were fitted with zoom lock switches to prevent their barrels from extending beyond the 18mm focal length while in transit. That said neither barrels of the models on test could be described as loose, and it was possible to zoom-in to 200mm on both, point vertically upwards and not suffer from any creep back down. The Nikkor lens didn't have a lock, but could be pointed up or down without suffering from discernable creep.


 
Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores
     
USA readers

 
UK readers
Jessops discount voucher

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home