Support Cameralabs by shopping at my partner stores or buying me a coffee!
Buy me a coffee!

Follow my RSS feed at Camera Labs RSS Feed
  Latest camera reviews

Lumix G80 / G85
Olympus OMD EM1 II
Sony RX10 Mark III
Sony RX100 Mark V
Nikon COOLPIX B700
Sony A6500
Lumix FZ2000 / FZ2500
Nikon COOLPIX B500
Lumix LX10 / LX15
Fujifilm XT2
Nikon D3400
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Ricoh GR II
Canon G7X Mark II
Canon SX720 HS
Canon EOS 80D
Olympus TG Tracker
Nikon D500 review
Canon EOS 1300D / T6
Lumix GX80 / GX85
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X70
Lumix TZ80 ZS60
Sony A6300
Canon PowerShot G5X
Lumix TZ100 ZS100
Sony A7s Mark II
Sony RX10 II
Lumix FZ330 / FZ300
Sony RX100 IV
Canon G9X
Fujifilm XT10
Nikon COOLPIX L840
Canon SX530 HS
Olympus OMD EM10 II
Canon SX410 IS
Panasonic Lumix GX8
Olympus TOUGH TG860
Sony A7r Mark II
Canon PowerShot D30
Olympus TOUGH TG4
Canon PowerShot G3X
Canon EOS 5Ds
Nikon COOLPIX S9900
Sony HX90V
Canon EOS T6s 760D
Panasonic Lumix G7
Panasonic Lumix SZ8
Canon EOS M3
Olympus EPL7
Samsung NX3000
Panasonic Lumix GM5
Nikon D5500
Panasonic Lumix GF7
Olympus OMD EM5 II
Nikon COOLPIX S9700
Canon SX710 HS
Panasonic TZ70 / ZS50
Sony Alpha A7 Mark II
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Fujifilm X100T
Nikon COOLPIX S3600
Sony Alpha A5100
Sigma DP1 Quattro
Sony Cyber-shot W830
Nikon COOLPIX L830
Nikon D750
Canon SX400 IS
Sony Cyber-shot H400
Panasonic Lumix LX100
Canon SX60 HS
Canon ELPH 340 IXUS 265
Canon G7X
Nikon COOLPIX P530
Canon SX520 HS
Canon G1 X Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Panasonic TZ60 / ZS40
Sony RX100 III review
Sony A3000 review
Canon EOS 1200D T5
Sony WX350
Nikon P600
Sony Alpha A5000
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V
Panasonic Lumix GH4
Panasonic TS5 FT5
Sony Alpha A6000
Canon SX700 HS
Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TOUGH TG2
Nikon AW1
Nikon D3300
Fujifilm XT1
Olympus STYLUS 1
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Olympus OMD EM1
Panasonic Lumix GM1
Nikon D610
Sony Alpha A7
Nikon D5300
Canon PowerShot A2500
Sony Alpha A7r
Canon ELPH 130 IXUS 140
Nikon COOLPIX P520
Nikon COOLPIX L820
Canon PowerShot S120
Panasonic Lumix GX7
Canon SX510 HS
Canon PowerShot G16
Fujifilm X20
Panasonic FZ70 / FZ72
Canon EOS 70D
Sony RX100 II
Canon ELPH 330 IXUS 255
Panasonic Lumix GF6
Fujifilm XM1
Olympus EP5
Panasonic Lumix LF1
Panasonic TZ35 / ZS25
Olympus XZ2
Sony HX300
Panasonic Lumix G6
Sony HX50V
Fujifilm X100S
Canon SX280 HS
Canon EOS SL1 / 100D
Panasonic TZ40 / ZS30
Nikon D7100
Fujifilm X-E1
Canon EOS 6D
Nikon D5200
Panasonic Lumix GH3
Canon PowerShot S110
Panasonic Lumix G5
Sony NEX-6
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Nikon COOLPIX P7700
Olympus E-PL5
Canon EOS M
Panasonic TS20 / FT20
Canon PowerShot G15
Nikon D600
Nikon COOLPIX L810
Canon PowerShot D20
Sony RX100
Panasonic Lumix LX7
Canon SX500 IS
Fujifilm HS30 EXR
Sony HX200V
Panasonic FZ60 / FZ62
Canon 520HS / 500HS
Canon 110HS / 125HS
Nikon D800
Canon EOS T4i / 650D
Canon PowerShot A3400
Panasonic ZS15 / TZ25
Olympus E-M5
Nikon D3200
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Canon PowerShot A2300
Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Nikon D7000
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D

All camera reviews
  Best Buys: our top models
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikon lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories

Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join my Camera forum and let everyone know!
  DSLR Tips

Free Shipping on ALL Products
Pentax K200D Gordon Laing, July 2008

Pentax K200D verdict

Pentax K200D

The Pentax K200D is certainly a unique proposition in the current entry-level DSLR market. While most rival manufacturers are packing in the gadgets on their latest models, Pentax has opted for a more traditional approach, eschewing fashionable features like Live View and instead focusing on controls, customisation and build quality.

Like many cameras these days, the K200D shares a number of technologies in common with a former model, but rather than enhancing an earlier budget option, Pentax has instead drawn on last year’s flagship, the K10D. The new K200D may not boast the K10D’s penta-prism viewfinder, dual control dials, nor match its continuous shooting capabilities, but it does employ the same sensor, same Shake Reduction and same PRIME image processor, along with the K10D’s Sensitivity Priority ‘Sv’ shooting mode and a number of its menu options. And in one small respect, the K200D is actually a little better: its screen measures 2.7in to the K10D’s 2.5in. Many will also prefer its use of four standard AA batteries over proprietary Lithium Ion packs.

Perhaps most impressive of all though is the K200D’s build quality. It may be priced at a similar level to models like the Nikon D60, Olympus E-520 and Sony Alpha A300, but is impressively weather-resistant with 60 environmental seals. That’s something you’d normally only find on pricier semi-pro models.

The K200D additionally sports an upper LCD information screen, support for both Pentax’s own PEF and Adobe’s DNG RAW formats, along with optional in-camera RAW processing and even a dedicated RAW button on the side, again inherited from the K10D.

So with semi-pro build quality and a number of features which were top of the Pentax range only last year, the K200D is off to a flying start. But it’s not all good news. As mentioned above, the K200D is missing out on some of the latest gadgetry which has become almost standard in the current DSLR market. Most obviously, there’s no Live View, which means it also misses out on things like face detection. The continuous shooting is disappointing, firing at a relatively modest 2.8fps for only four or five frames. The build quality may be excellent, but as a result the K200D is bigger and much heavier than most entry-level DSLRs. We also found the built-in Shake Reduction wasn’t as effective as rival systems.

Image quality is good, but like all Pentax DSLRs we’ve tested, there’s a tendency to underexpose. This may protect highlight detail, but in many situations you really do need to apply positive compensation. Interestingly, while the earlier K10D was criticised for its relatively muted default image processing, the K200D has arguably gone too far in the other direction: take it out on a Sunny day and the results can often look unreal, although in its favour, there’s plenty of opportunity to tweak the settings, and of course you may actually prefer this punchy approach.

So when considering the K200D, it’s very important to compare its features against the competition and to think carefully about which will mean the most to you in practice. So without further ado, here’s how it compares to three major rivals.

Compared to Canon EOS 450D / Rebel XSi

Canon EOS 450D / Rebel XSi
In terms of pricing, the closest Canon DSLR will actually be the EOS 1000D / Rebel XS, but since this model wasn’t released at the time of writing, we’ll compare the K200D against the higher-end EOS 450D / Rebel XSi.

The Canon 450D / XSi with a stabilised kit lens costs roughly 30% more than the Pentax K200D kit, so you’d understandably be expecting more features. How about two extra Megapixels, a bigger 3in screen, faster 3.5fps continuous shooting with a bigger buffer, Live View facilities with contrast-based AF, 14-bit image processing, a bigger viewfinder, and PC remote control software which includes a live on-screen preview.

Not bad, but the argument isn’t entirely in the 450D / XSi’s favour. The Pentax K200D boasts far superior weatherproof build quality (although is heavier), built-in Shake Reduction which works with any lens, a slightly more sophisticated 11-point AF system, an upper LCD information screen, a dedicated RAW button, support for Adobe’s open DNG format, and is powered by four AA batteries which are readily available almost anywhere in the World. And as you’ll see in our K200D results pages, the extra two Megapixels of the 450D / XSi also don’t make much difference when using the kit lenses.

If you’ve decided you really want or need Live View though, you should carefully consider whether you’d exploit the 450D / XSi’s extra features. If you would, then it’s worth spending the extra. Check out our Canon EOS 450D / XSi review for full details.

Compared to Olympus E-520

Olympus E-520
The Olympus E-520 costs roughly the same as the Pentax K200D in their standard kits, and both cameras have several things in common. Both share 10 Megapixel resolution (albeit with different aspect ratios), both have built-in anti-shake facilities which work with any lens you attach, and both have 2.7in screens.

In its favour, the E-520 features Live View with contrast-based AF and face detection, along with faster 3.5fps continuous shooting with a bigger buffer. Its anti-shake and anti-dust systems were more effective than the K200D in our tests and the body is noticeably smaller and lighter – there’s even an optional underwater housing.

The K200D’s advantages remain pretty much the same as before: far superior weatherproof build quality (although heavier), an upper LCD information screen, a dedicated RAW button, support for Adobe’s open DNG format, and standard AA batteries for power. The K200D’s optical viewfinder is also bigger than the E-520’s and it employs are much more sophisticated 11-point AF system to the relatively basic 3-points of the Olympus.

If you ultimately prefer the E-520’s feature-set though, it’s a tough model to beat, packing-in a great deal of technology for the money. See our Olympus E-520 review for more details.

Compared to Sony Alpha DSLR-A300

Sony Alpha DSLR A300
At the time of writing, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 was coming-in slightly cheaper than the K200D, and again both cameras sport 10 Megapixel resolution, built-in anti-shake facilities which work with any lens and 2.7in screens.

Where the Sony A300 really differs though is in terms of Live View. For starters it has Live View, but unlike the other models here, makes it really useful thanks to a vertically-tilting monitor, quick operation and uncompromised AF performance. It may not feature the technical accuracy of the Canon or Olympus Live View systems, but anyone coming from a point-and-shoot will prefer the speed and lack of fuss. The A300 is also powered by an Info Lithium battery which tells you exactly what percentage of charge is remaining.

In its favour, the K200D again features far superior weatherproof build quality (although is heavier), an upper LCD information screen, a dedicated RAW button, support for Adobe’s open DNG format, a slightly more sophisticated 11-point AF system, and is powered by four AA batteries which are readily available. The K200D’s optical viewfinder is also bigger than the A300’s.

Many will however be drawn to the A300’s approach to Live View with fuss-free operation and a tilting monitor for easy composition at unusual angles. It’s also a little cheaper and the kit lens a little longer. See our Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 review for more details.

Also consider...

There's only so much room we have here for comparisons, but also consider the beginner-friendly Nikon D60, the small and light Olympus E-420 and the new entry-level Canon EOS 1000D / XS.

Pentax K200D final verdict

Support this site by price checking below

Pentax K10D

The K200D’s strengths and weaknesses against the competition are pretty consistent from the comparisons above. For the same money or a little less you could buy a lighter DSLR with Live View facilities and either a flip-out screen or faster continuous shooting. Or you could ignore the gadgetry, go for the K200D and enjoy superior build quality with weatherproofing along with a few fairly unique features like a top info screen, RAW button and AA battery power.

While there are a number of aspects to weigh-up, the choice between the K200D and rival DSLRs really boils down to how much you value build quality and Live View. If you want a tough, weatherproof DSLR at a low price, then buy the K200D. If however you’d prefer a smaller, lighter DSLR with Live View capabilities, then go for one of its rivals.

While complementing the K200D on inheriting many aspects of the K10D, it’s also important to keep an eye open for bargain deals on this former flagship. It has the same sensor, same anti-shake and same image processor, but sports better controls, superior continuous shooting and a bigger, brighter penta-prism viewfinder. Sure, the screen’s a little smaller and it doesn’t have the AA batteries or scene presets, but with end-of-line K10D bodies coming-in at roughly the same price as a K200D kit, it’s a compelling option while stocks last. But back to the K200D.

As always it’s important to think carefully about what you really need from a camera while also being realistic whether a particular model will deliver it in practice. For instance, the K200D’s tough build and weatherproofing sounds ideal for a traveller’s DSLR which could resist moisture, dust and sand, while the use of AA batteries is certainly reassuring in remote locations. But like all DSLRs, full weather-proofing requires an equally-sealed lens, and the K200D’s heavier body weight may rule it out for those who want to travel light.

Equally its build and weatherproofing would give it the edge over rivals when photographing action in damp, dusty or sandy conditions, but the modest 2.8fps continuous shooting rate and small buffer reduce its suitability in this regard.

Pentax K200D

But the bottom line is we’re dealing with a budget DSLR here, and as such there will always be compromises. If you want weatherproofing and fast shooting, then you’ll need to spend more on a semi-pro model like the Canon EOS 40D.

So while the K200D may be missing out in some respects, it does boast by far the best build quality of any entry-level DSLR. Couple that with the upper screen and unique RAW options, along with plenty of control over processing and customisation, and you have a DSLR which really stands out from the crowd and one we can Highly Recommend. Ultimately if you want a tough DSLR with weather-proofing, but can’t stretch to a semi-pro model, then the K200D really is your only choice.

Good points

Tough and weatherproof body.
Built-in Shake Reduction.
Convenient AA battery power.
Broad degree of customisation.

Bad points
No Live View facilities.
Anti-shake not as effective as rivals.
Disappointing continuous shooting.
Tendency to underexpose.


(compared to 2008 budget DSLRs)

Build quality:
Image quality:


19 / 20
18 / 20
16 / 20
16 / 20
17 / 20


Support this site by checking prices above or shopping via our affiliate stores
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2017 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ Best Cameras / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs