Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 vs Nikon D5100 Real-life resolution (default settings)
I shot this scene in the G3's 4:3 aspect ratio which delivers the highest resolution. The Nikon D5100 was set to its native 3:2 aspect ratio and the lenses on both cameras adjusted to deliver the same vertical field of view. As such, I'm only comparing the vertical resolution of each camera here, and by only considering a 4:3 cropped area of the Nikon's wider 3:2 frame, it's effectively being treated as a 14 Megapixel camera. So the Nikon crops show a slightly larger area. But while this has now effectively become 16 vs 14 Megapixels, remember the Nikon is recording a wider image with a Megapixel of information on either side. On the previous page we saw how the Lumix G3's default JPEG processing looked relatively laid-back compared to the punchier Canon T3i / 600D, but the D5100 adopts a similarly restrained approach; indeed if anything it's slightly more laid back still. Again in the first row of crops, the Lumix G3 is looking softer, although again the crop form the D5100 is taken from further from the edge of its frame, so it's not surprising to see it looking sharper. What both cameras have in common though is automatic reduction of chromatic aberrations on JPEGs, so you won't see any nasty coloured fringing on either set of crops here. Shame Canon doesn't adopt the same strategy for its DSLRs to date. In terms of actual resolved detail, you're effectively looking at 16 vs 14 Megapixels and as you might expect, there's not a great deal in it. Pixel-peepers may notice a fractional benefit to the G3 in some of the finest details, but as far as I'm concerned, it's a draw in terms of real-life detail. Both cameras are recording plenty of it, so as I concluded on the previous page, it's a great result for the new sensor in the G3 to scale-up and match the best of the current APS-C DSLRs in detail. Before moving onto my G3 high ISO noise comparison, check out the difference shooting in RAW can make in the Lumix G3 RAW vs JPEG page.
|