|
Panasonic Lumix FZ45 / FZ40 |
Panasonic Lumix FZ100 |
Canon PowerShot SX30 IS |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
| We photographed the scene pictured above using the FZ45 / FZ40's RAW plus Large Fine JPEG mode, allowing us to directly compare images created from exactly the same data. Below are 100% crops taken from the original JPEG file alongside the RAW version, processed with the supplied Silkypix Developer Studio 3.1 SE; by default, the Unsharp Mask is set to zero in SilkyPIX, which unsurprisingly delivers a very soft result, so here we've increased the amount to 100 in order to accentuate fine details. We've also included crops taken from the FZ100's RAW file, processed with the same settings for comparison. Note in the first row of crops, the distant building was in shade when we took our FZ45 / FZ40 sample, but the other areas of the composition weren't affected.
At first glance the in-camera JPEG and processed RAW results from the FZ45 / FZ40 look quite similar with the default settings, but look closely and you'll spot greater noise speckles on the latter, especially in flat areas of colour like the blue sky. Clearly the FZ45 / FZ40 is applying greater noise reduction to its in-camera JPEGs by default than the standard settings of Silkypix. Which is better is entirely personal: some may like all speckles to be smoothed-out by noise reduction, even at the cost of ultimate detail, while others will prefer a more hands-off approach which leaves some noise behind in an attempt to preserve detail. Of course the important question is whether there is actually any more detail visible on the RAW version, and the answer is very little in this case. But the valuable thing is having access to a wide variety of settings to tweak, along a higher dynamic range to play with, so those who want to get the best from their FZ45 / FZ40 should definitely shoot in RAW and experiment with different settings for the desired result. Moving onto the FZ100 crops, it's clear they're also showing more noise speckles than the in-camera JPEG (seen above); it's certainly revealing to see the FZ100 RAW file suffering from more noise than the FZ45 / FZ40 at the same ISO sensitivity. But while the FZ100 RAW crops below are noisier than those from the FZ45 / FZ40 alongside it, they're arguably preferable to the overly-smeared results from in-camera JPEGs above. Clearly the FZ100's CMOS sensor is noisier than the CCD in the FZ45 / FZ40, and Panasonic has attempted to mask this with overly-aggressive noise reduction. But for our money, turning down the noise reduction, whether on in-camera JPEGs or by processing RAW files, produces a better result. Yes there's much more visible noise, but also lots more detail. We'll take a closer look at the FZ100's image quality in our separate review of that camera. Now let's look at how the camera performs at longer focal lengths in our mid-range resolution and telephoto resolution test pages before seeing how it compares at higher sensitivities in our High ISO Noise results. |
Panasonic Lumix FZ45 / FZ40 (JPEG) |
Panasonic Lumix FZ45 / FZ40 (RAW) |
Panasonic Lumix FZ100 (RAW) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 80 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 80 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 80 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 80 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |