Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Sony Cybershot DSC-W220
Canon PowerShot G11
Canon IXUS 95 / SD1200IS
Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Olympus 'PEN' E-P1
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FS25
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony Cyber-shot W270/290
Canon PowerShot A2100IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Canon IXUS 980 / SD990IS
Nikon D3x
Panasonic Lumix GH1
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro DSLRs
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Olympus Zuiko Digital 25mm 1:2.8 'pancake' Gordon Laing, June 2008

More Results : Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

Olympus ZD 25mm vs ZD 12-60mm outdoor resolution comparison with E-420

Support this site by price checking below




  To compare the real-life performance of the Olympus 25mm pancake lens we shot the same scene with it and the premium ZD 12-60mm kit lens within moments of each other using an Olympus E-420. The 12-60mm was adjusted to match the field of view of the 25mm, and both lenses were set to f8 in Aperture Priority mode.

The E-420 recording mode was set to Large Fine with its default settings for tone and noise reduction. The crops are taken from the originals and presented here at 100%.

The image left was taken with the Olympus 25mm pancake lens at f8 using the Olympus E-420 body; the original JPEG measured 4.74MB.

Here the Olympus 25m pancake delivers a good sharp result that's packed with detail - impressive for an optic that's physically so compact. Indeed there's essentially no difference between it and the 12-60mm when you're comparing the middle portions of each image, as seen in the second row of crops.

Move out towards the edges where many lenses become noticeably softer, and the 25mm pancake still holds it together pretty well. The main difference between it and the 12-60mm though concerns coloured fringing. Most obviously in the first row of crops, taken from the top left corner, there's some coloured fringing on the 25mm crop which isn't visible on the 12-60mm sample.

A little coloured fringing is also visible on the edges of objects and buildings in the third and fourth row of crops. Again this is absent on the 12-60mm, and allows its details to look better defined.

So the Zuiko Digital 12-60mm is optically superior in this respect, but it is of course a premium model that's bigger, heavier and more expensive. Apart from a little coloured fringing towards the corners, we'd say the 25mm pancake performs very well across the frame, and fulfils its purpose as an all-round compact prime lens with little optical compromise. Now let's see how it measures-up in terms of studio resolution.

Olympus Zuiko Digital 25mm
with Olympus E-420
 
Olympus Zuiko Digital 12-60mm
with Olympus E-420
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO

Olympus ZD 25mm results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home