Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Fujifilm FinePix F60fd
Olympus Stylus µ 1050 SW
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Pentax Optio W60
Panasonic Lumix FZ28

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77
Canon PowerShot SX10 IS
Canon PowerShot A2000IS
Canon PowerShot G10
Canon IXUS 870 / SD 880IS
Sony Alpha A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Latest DSLRs
     



Canon
Olympus
Pentax
Nikon
Panasonic
Sony
     
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro / Lenses
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Olympus Zuiko Digital 12-60mm 1:2.8-4 Gordon Laing, September 2008

More Results : Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

Support this site by price checking below

Olympus 12-60mm lens

Olympus ZD 12-60mm vs 14-45mm outdoor resolution comparisons with E-3

  To compare the real-life performance of the Olympus 12-60mm lens we shot the same scene with it and the original Olympus 14-45mm kit lens within moments of each other using an Olympus E-3; the newer 14-42mm lens was not available for this test, but we have an additional comparison below against the 25mm pancake. Each lens in this first comparison was set to 20mm f8 using the E-3 in Aperture Priority mode.

The E-3 recording mode was set to Large Fine with its default settings for tone and noise reduction. The crops are taken from the originals and presented here at 100%.

The image left was taken with the Olympus E-3 using the 12-60mm at 20mm f8; the original JPEG measured 4.72MB.

The crops are taken from the upper left, middle, lower right and lower left portions of the image. Compare the second row of crops taken from the middle of each image and both lenses deliver essentially the same result. But as you explore the edges and corners of each image, the superiority of the 12-60mm becomes clear.

This is particularly apparent in the first and third row of crops, where the 14-45mm kit zoom exhibits noticeable softening. It's actually not that bad viewed in isolation, but compare it against the 12-60mm and it's obvious the premium Olympus zoom is delivering far better performance. It's impressively sharp across the entire frame.

This example may have been taken at 20mm, but the same applies with the 12-60mm whether it's zoomed-in or completely out. The entire image is consistently sharp right into the corners, and in this respect it's one of the best lenses we've tested. To see how it compares against a rival system, take a look at our Olympus E-3 review where you'll see results next to the Nikkor DX 17-55mm f2.8 mounted on a D300 body. But do also scroll down further on this page to see how the 12-60mm compares against the fixed focal length 25mm pancake, this time when both lenses are mounted on an E-420 body.

Olympus Zuiko Digital 12-60mm
with Olympus E-3
 
Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-45mm
with Olympus E-3
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO


Olympus ZD 12-60mm vs 25mm pancake outdoor resolution comparisons with E-420

Support this site by price checking below

Olympus 25mm pancake lens
Olympus E-410 with 7-14mm at 14mm f8   Our second real-life comparison is against a fixed focal length lens - the Olympus 25mm pancake. Once again we shot the same scene with both lenses within moments of each other, although this time using an Olympus E-420 body. The 12-60mm was adjusted to match the field of view of the 25mm, and both lenses were set to f8 in Aperture Priority mode.

The E-420 recording mode was set to Large Fine with its default settings for tone and noise reduction. The crops are taken from the originals and presented here at 100%.

The image left was taken with the Olympus 25mm pancake lens at f8 using the Olympus E-420 body; the original JPEG measured 4.74MB.

Here the Olympus 25m pancake delivers a good sharp result that's packed with detail - impressive for an optic that's physically so compact. Indeed there's essentially no difference between it and the 12-60mm when you're comparing the middle portions of each image, as seen in the second row of crops.

Move out towards the edges where many lenses become noticeably softer, and the 25mm pancake still holds it together pretty well. The main difference between it and the 12-60mm though concerns coloured fringing. Most obviously in the first row of crops, taken from the top left corner, there's some coloured fringing on the 25mm crop which isn't visible on the 12-60mm sample.

A little coloured fringing is also visible on the edges of objects and buildings in the third and fourth row of crops. Again this is absent on the 12-60mm, and allows its details to look better defined.

So the Zuiko Digital 12-60mm is optically superior in this respect, but it is of course a premium model that's bigger, heavier and more expensive. Now let's see how it performs in terms of studio resolution.

Olympus Zuiko Digital 12-60mm
with Olympus E-420
 
Olympus Zuiko Digital 25mm
with Olympus E-420
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO
f8, 100 ISO


Olympus ZD 12-60mm results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting


Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


 
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Home