Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW Gordon Laing, December 2008

Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise


Support this site by price checking below

Canon PowerShot SD880 / Ixus 870 IS
Canon PowerShot SD880 / Ixus 870 IS
Olympus 1050 SW vs Pentax W60 vs Canon 870IS / SD 880IS High ISO Noise


To compare noise levels under real-life conditions we shot this scene with the Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW, Pentax W60 and Canon IXUS 870IS / SD 880IS within a few moments of each other using each of their ISO settings.

The lenses on each camera were adjusted to deliver the same field of view. Where coarse increments prevented an exact match using the zoom alone, the camera's position was moved slightly back or forth to compensate.


The image above was taken with the Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW at a sensitivity of 80 ISO, with the lens zoomed-out to its widest equivalent of 38mm; the exposure was 1/2 a second at f3.5 and the original 10M Fine JPEG file measured 4.16MB. The crops are taken from an area just to the right of the centre and presented at 100%.

Note: the Pentax crops below are suffering from a lack of contrast compared to the other models on test here, resulting in a softer, muddy effect. We noticed this on some other W60 images, containing strongly lit elements in otherwise dim conditions, such as the bright backlit windows here on the right. There may also be stray light or fingerprint issues with the protective lens covering. Either way, this is our standard low-light environment, and all cameras are tested under the same conditions. As such, while the W60 is clearly suffering here in some respect, the fact is the other cameras coped better with the composition and lighting.

Moving onto the crops, at its lowest sensitivity of 80 ISO, the Olympus 1050 SW delivers a clean, detailed result, although it's lacking the contrast and sharpness of the Canon's punchier processing - and arguably superior lens. At 100 ISO, the noise reduction strategies of each camera is becoming more apparent, with Olympus successfully eliminating any textures, albeit with a lack of crispness on items like the flower pot. Pentax is adopting a more hands-off approach to noise reduction, which may result in more visible speckles, but attempts to retain fine detail.

At 200 ISO, all three cameras are showing a loss in detail, with the 1050 SW beginning to exhibit subtle noise textures, while at 400 ISO the noise levels are becoming quite obvious, especially on the W60. At 800 ISO there’s a dramatic turn for the worse from all three models, with each now clearly showing their different strategies for handling the noise. This really is as far as you’d want to use any of them, and even then at reduced sizes only.

At 1600 ISO all three are delivering images that are only really usable for web thumbnails, and sensibly that's as far as the Olympus 1050 SW goes, leaving its rivals to mess around with 3200 ISO, and in the case of the Pentax W60, even a 6400 ISO mode. Now head over to our Olympus µ 1050SW / Stylus 1050SW Gallery to see some more real-life shots in a variety of conditions.

 


Olympus µ 1050SW / Stylus 1050SW
Pentax Optio W60
Canon IXUS 870IS / SD 880IS
   
80 ISO
50 ISO
80 ISO
         
   
100 ISO
100 ISO
100 ISO
         
   
200 ISO
200 ISO
200 ISO
         
   
400 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
         
   
800 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
         
   
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
         
This sensitivity not available    
3200 ISO not available
3200 ISO
3200 ISO (at 2 Megapixels)
         
This sensitivity not available     This sensitivity not available
6400 ISO not available
6400 ISO
6400 ISO not available


Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise



All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs