Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Olympus 'PEN' E-P1
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FS25
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony Cyber-shot W270/290
Canon PowerShot A2100IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Canon IXUS 980 / SD990IS
Nikon D3x
Panasonic Lumix GH1
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Fujifilm FinePix F60fd
Olympus Stylus µ 1050 SW
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Pentax Optio W60
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77
Canon PowerShot G10
Canon IXUS 870 / SD 880IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro DSLRs
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW Gordon Laing, December 2008

Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise


Support this site by price checking below

Canon PowerShot SD880 / Ixus 870 IS
Canon PowerShot SD880 / Ixus 870 IS
Olympus 1050 SW vs Pentax W60 vs Canon 870IS / SD 880IS High ISO Noise


To compare noise levels under real-life conditions we shot this scene with the Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW, Pentax W60 and Canon IXUS 870IS / SD 880IS within a few moments of each other using each of their ISO settings.

The lenses on each camera were adjusted to deliver the same field of view. Where coarse increments prevented an exact match using the zoom alone, the camera's position was moved slightly back or forth to compensate.


The image above was taken with the Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW at a sensitivity of 80 ISO, with the lens zoomed-out to its widest equivalent of 38mm; the exposure was 1/2 a second at f3.5 and the original 10M Fine JPEG file measured 4.16MB. The crops are taken from an area just to the right of the centre and presented at 100%.

Note: the Pentax crops below are suffering from a lack of contrast compared to the other models on test here, resulting in a softer, muddy effect. We noticed this on some other W60 images, containing strongly lit elements in otherwise dim conditions, such as the bright backlit windows here on the right. There may also be stray light or fingerprint issues with the protective lens covering. Either way, this is our standard low-light environment, and all cameras are tested under the same conditions. As such, while the W60 is clearly suffering here in some respect, the fact is the other cameras coped better with the composition and lighting.

Moving onto the crops, at its lowest sensitivity of 80 ISO, the Olympus 1050 SW delivers a clean, detailed result, although it's lacking the contrast and sharpness of the Canon's punchier processing - and arguably superior lens. At 100 ISO, the noise reduction strategies of each camera is becoming more apparent, with Olympus successfully eliminating any textures, albeit with a lack of crispness on items like the flower pot. Pentax is adopting a more hands-off approach to noise reduction, which may result in more visible speckles, but attempts to retain fine detail.

At 200 ISO, all three cameras are showing a loss in detail, with the 1050 SW beginning to exhibit subtle noise textures, while at 400 ISO the noise levels are becoming quite obvious, especially on the W60. At 800 ISO there’s a dramatic turn for the worse from all three models, with each now clearly showing their different strategies for handling the noise. This really is as far as you’d want to use any of them, and even then at reduced sizes only.

At 1600 ISO all three are delivering images that are only really usable for web thumbnails, and sensibly that's as far as the Olympus 1050 SW goes, leaving its rivals to mess around with 3200 ISO, and in the case of the Pentax W60, even a 6400 ISO mode. Now head over to our Olympus µ 1050SW / Stylus 1050SW Gallery to see some more real-life shots in a variety of conditions.

 


Olympus µ 1050SW / Stylus 1050SW
Pentax Optio W60
Canon IXUS 870IS / SD 880IS
   
80 ISO
50 ISO
80 ISO
         
   
100 ISO
100 ISO
100 ISO
         
   
200 ISO
200 ISO
200 ISO
         
   
400 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
         
   
800 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
         
   
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
         
This sensitivity not available    
3200 ISO not available
3200 ISO
3200 ISO (at 2 Megapixels)
         
This sensitivity not available     This sensitivity not available
6400 ISO not available
6400 ISO
6400 ISO not available


Olympus µ 1050 SW / Stylus 1050 SW results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise



All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home