Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Support me by shopping at Amazon!
Olympus E-410 Gordon Laing, May 2007


Olympus E-410 results :
Outdoor / Resolution / Noise / Noise 2

Support this site by shopping via these links

 
 
 


 
Olympus E-410 vs Canon EOS 400D / XTi real-life noise

 

To compare noise levels under real-life conditions we shot this scene using the Olympus E-410 and Canon 400D / XTi at each of their ISO sensitivities and using their best quality JPEG settings. The samples were taken moments apart.

Each camera was fitted with their respective kit lenses: the Olympus ZD 14-42mm and Canon EF-S 18-55mm. The 400D / XTi captures a wider 3:2 frame, but the focal length of each lens was adjusted to deliver the same vertical field of view. As a result the E-410 crops have a slight resolution advantage vertically and therefore show correspondingly smaller areas.


The image above was taken with the Olympus E-410 at 24mm f8, with a sensitivity of 100 ISO; the original SHQ JPEG measured 6.52MB. The Canon 400D / XTi images were taken with matching exposures and its 100 ISO sample measured 3.48MB. The crops are taken from an area just below and to the left of the centre. The E-410 crops show a slightly smaller area because it has a slightly higher vertical resolution. The E-410 was also set to its default Noise Reduction settings, with the Noise Filter set to Standard.

Between 100 and 400 ISO, the Olympus E-410 delivers good, clean results with little or no noise or noise reduction artefacts. Like most DSLRs, the big drop in quality occurs at 800 ISO, where the E-410 exhibits much higher noise reduction and smearing of ultimate detail as a result. The 1600 ISO result looks quite fuzzy and has lost a lot of detail.

In contrast, the Canon 400D / XTi applies less noise reduction, so as a consequence keeps hold of its fine detail at higher sensitivities, if at the cost of visible noise speckles. We'd sooner have this approach though as at least the detail isn't lost forever.

Interestingly this default approach by the E-410 is quite different to its predecessor, which wasn't afraid to turn down the noise reduction to maintain detail. See our Olympus E-400 results for more details.

Luckily though the E-410 features four different Noise Filter settings, two of which deliver less aggressive noise reduction - and we have samples of them lower down this page.


Olympus E-410
Using ZD 14-42mm
 
Canon EOS 400D / Rebel XTi
Using EF-S 18-55mm
Olympus E-410 w/ 14-42mm at 100 ISO   Canon 400D / XTi w/ 18-55mm at 100 ISO
100 ISO
 
100 ISO
     
Olympus E-410 w/ 14-42mm at 200 ISO   Canon 400D / XTi w/ 18-55mm at 200 ISO
200 ISO
 
200 ISO
     
Olympus E-410 w/ 14-42mm at 400 ISO   Canon 400D / XTi w/ 18-55mm at 400 ISO
400 ISO
 
400 ISO
     
Olympus E-410 w/ 14-42mm at 800 ISO   Canon 400D / XTi w/ 18-55mm at 800 ISO
800 ISO
 
800 ISO
     
Olympus E-410 w/ 14-42mm at 1600 ISO   Canon 400D / XTi w/ 18-55mm at 1600 ISO
1600 ISO
 
1600 ISO
 

Olympus E-410 Noise Filter comparison

The Olympus E-410 offers four different Noise Filter settings: Off, Low, Standard and High. Standard is the default setting, so that's what we've used in the comparisons against the Canon EOS 400D / XTi above. To see how the E-410 handles the same subject matter with different Noise Filter settings though, we shot the same scene as above using each of them - and at each ISO - and presented 100% crops below.

As you'd expect, evidence of noise speckles are higher with the lower Noise Filter settings, and detail becomes more smeared-out at the higher Noise Filter settings. No surprise there, but we'd say Olympus has probably gone for a bit too much noise reduction for its default setting. There's lots more detail visible with the Noise Filter set to Low and little additional noise to worry about - this would be our preferred setting for JPEGs processed in-camera. That said, if we were reducing noise with software later, we'd argue the first vertical column of crops with the Noise Filter Off are actually the best starting point in terms of maximum detail captured.

Note: one final observation is the E-410 does not appear to double its actual sensitivity when the ISO value is doubled. Our exposure at 100 ISO for both the E-410 and Canon 400D / XTi samples was 1/250; therefore the exposures at 200, 400, 800 and 1600 ISO should have been 1/500, 1/1000, 1/2000 and 1/4000 respectively. These were indeed the exposures for the Canon, but instead the E-410 increased its exposures by slightly smaller steps: at 200, 400, 800 and 1600 ISO, it metered 1/400, 1/640, 1/1250 and 1/2500 respectively. So while the jump from 400 to 800 ISO and 800 to 1600 ISO did show a halving of the shutter speed, the differences between 100 and 200 ISO and 200 to 400 ISO are closer to 2/3EV. We don't see this as a fault in the E-410's metering, as the image brightness appears consistent across the ISO range, but just don't assume doubling the ISO will consistently halve your shutter speed.


Olympus E-410
Noise Filter: Off
 
Olympus E-410
Noise Filter: Low
 
Olympus E-410
Noise Filter: Standard
 
Olympus E-410
Noise Filter: High
             
Olympus E-410 at 100 ISO - NF off   Olympus E-410 at 100 ISO - NF low   Olympus E-410 at 100 ISO - NF standard   Olympus E-410 at 100 ISO - NF high
100 ISO
 
100 ISO
 
100 ISO
 
100 ISO
             
Olympus E-410 at 200 ISO - NF off   Olympus E-410 at 200 ISO - NF low   Olympus E-410 at 200 ISO - NF standard   Olympus E-410 at 200 ISO - NF high
200 ISO
 
200 ISO
 
200 ISO
 
200 ISO
             
Olympus E-410 at 400 ISO - NF off   Olympus E-410 at 400 ISO - NF low   Olympus E-410 at 400 ISO - NF standard   Olympus E-410 at 400 ISO - NF high
400 ISO
 
400 ISO
 
400 ISO
 
400 ISO
             
Olympus E-410 at 800 ISO - NF off   Olympus E-410 at 800 ISO - NF low   Olympus E-410 at 800 ISO - NF standard   Olympus E-410 at 800 ISO - NF high
800 ISO
 
800 ISO
 
800 ISO
 
800 ISO
             
Olympus E-410 at 1600 ISO - NF off   Olympus E-410 at 1600 ISO - NF low   Olympus E-410 at 1600 ISO - NF standard   Olympus E-410 at 1600 ISO - NF high
1600 ISO
 
1600 ISO
 
1600 ISO
 
1600 ISO

Olympus E-410 results

Outdoor / Resolution / Noise / Noise 2
If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs