Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Olympus E-400 with Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 ED Gordon Laing, November 2006

Outdoor / Resolution / Noise / Noise 2 / Corner sharpness / Fringe & macro / Geometry / Vignetting

Outdoor scene - Olympus E-400 vs Canon EOS 400D / XTi vs Panasonic L1

Olympus E-400 with 14-42mm at 21mm f8




To compare real-life performance we shot the same scene with the Olympus E-400, Canon 400D / XTi and Panasonic L1 within a few moments of each other using their best quality JPEG settings and 100 ISO sensitivity.

Each camera was fitted with their respective kit lenses: the Olympus ZD 14-42mm, Canon EF-S 18-55mm and Leica 14-50mm. The 400D / XTi captured a wider 3:2 frame, but the focal length of each lens was adjusted to deliver the same vertical field of view.

The image above was taken with the Olympus E-400 at 21mm f8, with a sensitivity of 100 ISO; the original SHQ JPEG measured 7.06MB; the Canon 400D / XTi and Panasonic L1 images were taken with the same exposures and measured 4.57 and 4.80MB respectively.

The crops are taken from the upper left, center and lower right portions of the originals and presented here at 100%.



 
Olympus E-400
Using ZD 14-42mm
Canon 400D / XTi
Using EF-S 18-55mm
Panasonic L1
Using Leica 14-50mm
Olympus E-400 with 14-42mm lens crop 1   Canon EOS 400D with 18-55mm lens crop 1   Panasonic L1 with 14-50mm lens crop 1
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
         
Olympus E-400 with 14-42mm lens crop 2   Canon EOS 400D with 18-55mm lens crop 2   Panasonic L1 with 14-50mm lens crop 2
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
 
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
 
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
         
Olympus E-400 with 14-42mm lens crop 3   Canon EOS 400D with 18-55mm lens crop 3   Panasonic L1 with 14-50mm lens crop 3
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
 
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
 
1/250, f8, 100 ISO

Judging from the samples above, the Olympus E-400 is capable of recording roughly the same degree of detail as the Canon EOS 400D / XTi when both are using their respective kit lenses. The Olympus and Panasonic samples of the mountain also exhibit less colour fringing than the Canon kit lens, which is especially impressive when you consider the Canon captured a wider 3:2 image, so its particular crop was taken further from the extreme corners.

As seen in our other Canon 400D / XTi tests, its kit lens suffers with detail in the corners which is most visible on the trees in the final row of crops. Again the Olympus and Panasonic resolve greater foliage detail - and again despite being taken from an area closer to the edges of their frames. Overall, a good result for the Olympus E-400 and its kit lens. Under real-life conditions, it's clearly comparable with arguably it's biggest 10 Megapixel DSLR rival and in some optical respects beats it.

Support this site by shopping via these links

 

 

Olympus E-400 JPEG versus RAW comparison

To eliminate the effect of the E-400’s in-camera processing and compression, we set it to record a RAW file at the same time as an SHQ JPEG, again using the default Vivid Colour Mode. The JPEG and RAW files measured 7.06MB and 21MB respectively.

The RAW file was processed with Adobe Camera RAW using the default settings (and 'As Shot' White Balance), then transferred to Photoshop with 16-bit tonal depth, before converting to 8-bit then cropping and saving using the same JPEG settings as above.


Olympus E-400 JPEG versus RAW, using Zuiko Digital 14-42mm
Olympus E-400 - JPEG
Olympus E-400 - RAW
JPEG, 1/250, f8, 100 ISO
RAW conversion, 1/250, f8, 100 ISO

Using the Adobe Camera RAW defaults and 'As Shot' White Balance, the processed RAW file is considerably more saturated than the in-camera JPEG, something which is particularly apparent on the lake colour. Although we should say, the lake on the day more resembled the colour on the right. Even with the levels applied by ACR, there's arguably greater tonal detail in the RAW sample, especially in the trees, but still some annoying artefacts around the roofs on the far left side. Of course as always, different source material, not to mention different RAW converters may deliver different results.

One thing we should mention though is Olympus' continued (and much appreciated) strategy of offering a very low compression SHQ JPEG mode in addition to more typical compression ratios. This SHQ mode may deliver relatively hefty files, but virtually eliminates the effect of JPEG compression on images. It's a great option to have and we'd like to see similar low compression modes available on all digital cameras.



Olympus E-400 results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Noise / Noise 2 / Corner sharpness / Fringe & macro / Geometry / Vignetting


Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


USA readers



 
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs