The other three crops basically illustrate differences in image processing, base sensitivity and kit lens quality. The Nikon D90 crops are all slightly brighter and less punchy than the 450D / XSi, although the Chromatic Aberration correction once again helps the D90 in the final row, and the Canon kit lens is once again letting the side down in its lower right corner, as seen in the third row. |
Nikon D90 with Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR |
Canon EOS 450D / XSi
with Canon EF 18-55mm IS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
f8, 200 ISO |
f8, 100 ISO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
f8, 200 ISO |
f8, 100 ISO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
f8, 200 ISO |
f8, 100 ISO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
f8, 200 ISO |
f8, 100 ISO |
|
| We photographed the scene here in the D90's RAW plus Large Fine JPEG mode, allowing us to directly compare images created from exactly the same data. Below are crops taken from the original JPEG file alongside the RAW version, processed in Nikon's optional Capture NX 2.1 software using the default settings. The processed RAW file appears similar to the in-camera JPEG other than a boost of sharpening. This has enhanced the detail across the image, although some of the saturated rooftops in the central portion here look a little electronic if you're studying it closely. Capture NX 2.1 offers a broad range of adjustments though including the ability to select different Active D-Lighting options (so long as it was enabled to some degree in the camera to start with). A small degree of tweaking can yield what most would consider to be superior output to the default JPEG processing, so if you're willing to spend the time, we'd recommend shooting in RAW. As you'll see on the next page, it technically delivers a little more resolution too. So without further ado, let's look at the Nikon D90's resolution in a studio environment. |
Nikon D90 JPEG with Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR |
Nikon D90 RAW
with Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
f8, 200 ISO |
f8, 200 ISO |
| USA readers |
|