Nikon D60 versus Canon EOS 400D / XTi real-life noise
Note: as on our first results page, the Canon EOS 400D / XTi underexposed this scene compared to the D60, so again here we've applied +2/3 EV exposure compensation to better match the Nikon results. The differences in colour and tone below are down to each camera's default image processing styles, with the D60 boosting many parameters for punchier (albeit sometimes unreal-looking) photos. Like the D40x before it, the D60 exhibits respectable results across its sensitivity range. Judging from the crops below, there's only a very slight drop in quality and detail at 400 ISO and another at 800 ISO. At 1600 ISO, noise is unsurprisingly creeping in, although there's still more fine detail than the Canon 400D / XTi at the same sensitivity. Finally, the 3200 ISO sample has quite noticeable noise, but it's still quite usable reproduced at smaller sizes.
|
Nikon D60 (NR off - default)
|
Nikon D60 (NR on) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
400 ISO
|
400 ISO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
800 ISO
|
800 ISO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
1600 ISO
|
1600 ISO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Hi1 (3200 ISO)
|
Hi1 (3200 ISO) |
|
| USA readers |
|