Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Support me by shopping at Amazon!
Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR II Gordon Laing, June 2010

Results : Sharpness 18mm / Sharpness 55mm / Sharpness 85mm / Sharpness 135mm / Sharpness 200mm / Geometry / Vignetting


Real-life sharpness at 85mm - Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR vs DX 18-105mm VR vs DX 18-200mm VR II

 
Support this site by shopping below

To compare sharpness at a short-telephoto focal length of 85mm, we shot this scene with the Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR, DX 18-105mm VR and DX 18-200mm VR II, using a Nikon D90 body at all apertures.

The D90 was set to RAW to avoid in-camera JPEG corrections; all files were processed in Nikon's Capture NX 2.2.3 with lens corrections disabled and the default sharpness of 3. VR was disabled on each lens, and magnified assistance in Live View used to confirm the focusing.

The image above was taken with the Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II mounted on a Nikon D90 body. The lens was set to 85mm f8, and the D90 to 200 ISO. In the samples below, the exposures were identical with each lens and the crops taken from the areas marked with the red squares for presentation here at 100%.

With all the lenses zoomed-into a short telephoto length of 85mm, there's a surprise result in the corners. The DX 18-105mm VR kit lens delivers a comfortably sharper result than either the DX 18-20mm VR II or the pricier DX 16-85mm VR. We re-tested each lens and rechecked the results, ensuring each lens was focused on the same point and each RAW file converted with the same parameters, but found the same result, at least with our samples of each model.

That said, the DX 18-200mm VR II doesn't perform too badly here: it manages to avoid any fringing and is only a little soft in the corners, but it can't help but look inferior next to those great results from the DX 18-105mm VR.

In the meantime, the DX 16-85mm VR suffers from a similar degree of corner softness to the super-zoom at this point, but manages to look noticeably worse thanks to coloured fringing. Remove the latter with correction in-camera or using software later and it looks much better.

Scroll down to the results from the centre and we see a similar story to the previous focal length: as such the three lenses look fairly similar at first glance, but look closely and you'll notice slightly superior definition from the DX 18-105mm VR compared to the DX 18-200mm VR II and fractionally more still from the DX 16-85mm VR.

Now scroll down beyond the two results tables to see whether the DX 55-200mm VR can redeem itself at this slightly longer focal length, or if you're not interested in this lens, head straight over to our Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II 135mm results.



Corner sharpness with all lenses at 85mm

Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR
Corner sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR
Corner sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II
Corner sharpness at 85mm
   
f5.3 not available
f5.3 not available
f5.3, 200 ISO
         
   
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
         
   
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO



Centre sharpness with all lenses at 85mm

Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR
Centre sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR
Centre sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II
Centre sharpness at 85mm
   
f5.3 not available
f5.3 not available
f5.3, 200 ISO
         
   
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
         
   
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO


Now let's add the DX 55-200mm VR into the mix to see how it compares...


Real-life sharpness at 85mm - Nikkor DX 55-200mm VR vs DX 18-105mm VR vs DX 18-200mm VR II

 
Support this site by shopping below

To compare sharpness at a short-telephoto focal length of 85mm, we shot this scene with the Nikkor DX 55-200mm VR, DX 18-105mm VR and DX 18-200mm VR II, using a Nikon D90 body at all apertures.

The D90 was set to RAW to avoid in-camera JPEG corrections; all files were processed in Nikon's Capture NX 2.2.3 with lens corrections disabled and the default sharpness of 3. VR was disabled on each lens, and magnified assistance in Live View used to confirm the focusing.

The image above was taken with the Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II mounted on a Nikon D90 body. The lens was set to 85mm f8, and the D90 to 200 ISO. In the samples below, the exposures were identical with each lens and the crops taken from the areas marked with the red squares for presentation here at 100%.

The first table compares crops taken from the corner of each image at different aperture settings and the second table compares crops taken from the centres of the same images.

At 85mm, the DX 55-200mm VR delivers a better corner result than it did at 55mm, but it's still not quite as well-corrected as the DX 18-200mm VR II super-zoom. The gap narrows by f8, but at larger apertures the super-zoom enjoys an edge. Again both results are made to look poor next to the DX 18-105mm VR at this particular focal length.

Now let's see how both the telephoto zoom and super-zoom compare when zoomed-in further in our Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II 135mm results.




Corner sharpness with all lenses at 85mm

Nikkor DX 55-200mm VR
Corner sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR
Corner sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II
Corner sharpness at 85mm
   
f4.2, 200 ISO
f5.3 not available
f5.3, 200 ISO
         
   
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
         
   
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO



Centre sharpness with all lenses at 85mm

Nikkor DX 55-200mm VR
Centre sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR
Centre sharpness at 85mm
Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II
Centre sharpness at 85mm
   
f4.2, 200 ISO
f5.3 not available
f5.3, 200 ISO
         
   
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
f5.6, 200 ISO
         
   
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO
f8, 200 ISO

Now let's see how the DX 18-200mm VR II measures-up when zoomed-into a mid-telephoto focal length of 135mm.



Results : Sharpness 18mm / Sharpness 55mm / Sharpness 85mm / Sharpness 135mm / Sharpness 200mm / Geometry / Vignetting



If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs