Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 






Follow my RSS feed at Camera Labs RSS Feed
 
  Latest camera reviews

Fujifilm X100T
Nikon COOLPIX S3600
Sony Alpha A5100
Sigma DP1 Quattro
Sony Cyber-shot W830
Nikon COOLPIX L830
Nikon D750
Canon SX400 IS
Sony Cyber-shot H400
Panasonic Lumix LX100
Canon SX60 HS
Canon ELPH 340 IXUS 265
Canon G7X
Nikon COOLPIX P530
Canon SX520 HS
Canon G1 X Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Panasonic TZ60 / ZS40
Sony RX100 III review
Sony A3000 review
Canon EOS 1200D T5
Sony WX350
Nikon P600
Sony Alpha A5000
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V
Panasonic Lumix GH4
Panasonic TS5 FT5
Sony Alpha A6000
Canon SX700 HS
Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TOUGH TG2
Nikon AW1
Nikon D3300
Fujifilm XT1
Olympus STYLUS 1
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Olympus OMD EM1
Panasonic Lumix GM1
Nikon D610
Sony Alpha A7
Nikon D5300
Canon PowerShot A2500
Sony Alpha A7r
Canon ELPH 130 IXUS 140
Nikon COOLPIX P520
Nikon COOLPIX L820
Canon PowerShot S120
Panasonic Lumix GX7
Canon SX510 HS
Canon PowerShot G16
Fujifilm X20
Panasonic FZ70 / FZ72
Canon EOS 70D
Sony RX100 II
Canon ELPH 330 IXUS 255
Panasonic Lumix GF6
Fujifilm XM1
Olympus EP5
Panasonic Lumix LF1
Panasonic TZ35 / ZS25
Olympus XZ2
Sony HX300
Panasonic Lumix G6
Sony HX50V
Fujifilm X100S
Canon SX280 HS
Canon EOS SL1 / 100D
Panasonic TZ40 / ZS30
Nikon D7100
Nikon COOLPIX A
Fujifilm X-E1
Canon EOS 6D
Nikon D5200
Panasonic Lumix GH3
Canon PowerShot S110
Panasonic Lumix G5
Sony NEX-6
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Nikon COOLPIX P7700
Olympus E-PL5
Canon EOS M
Panasonic TS20 / FT20
Canon PowerShot G15
Nikon D600
Nikon COOLPIX L810
Canon PowerShot D20
Sony RX100
Panasonic Lumix LX7
Canon SX500 IS
Fujifilm HS30 EXR
Sony HX200V
Panasonic FZ60 / FZ62
Canon 520HS / 500HS
Canon 110HS / 125HS
Nikon D800
Canon EOS T4i / 650D
Canon PowerShot A3400
Panasonic ZS15 / TZ25
Olympus E-M5
Nikon D3200
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Canon PowerShot A2300
Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Nikon D7000
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D

All camera reviews
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikon lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join my Camera forum and let everyone know!
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
lens rental
Nikkor AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Gordon Laing, April 2009
   
 

Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR verdict

The Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR is another quality general-purpose zoom for owners of DX-format Nikon bodies. It delivers a useful 24-128mm equivalent range covering most day-to-day situations, while including effective Vibration Reduction to counteract camera shake.

The lens feels solid and confident in use, with a metal mounting and rubber sealing taking it beyond kit models. Focusing is fairly quick and quiet and there’s a window showing distance markings.

In our tests, the Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR performed well, delivering good results across its optical range with minimal issues towards the extremes. There’s a small amount of softening in the corners, but it’s not bad by any means, and coloured fringing is kept low; what little there is also cleans-up nicely in Nikon’s Capture NX software or in JPEGs from bodies with in-camera correction like the D90.








Like most wide-angle lenses, there’s noticeable barrel distortion when zoomed-out, but it’s no worse than the majority of Nikkor general-purpose DX zooms, and remember it’s also zooming wider. Distortion when zoomed-in was kept lower than most DX zooms. Vignetting and light fall-off performance was also respectable with minimal darkening in the corners, especially when zoomed-in. All these tests were performed with RAW files converted without lens corrections to see exactly what was going on behind the scenes – for the full report, check out our results pages.

So far so good. The DX 16-85mm VR performs well physically and optically, while delivering a useful range with effective stabilisation. In fact there’s little to fault it on beyond the inevitable desire for the tougher build, brighter apertures and quicker focusing of much more expensive professional models. As such the Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR is easy to recommend as a general-purpose lens for owners of DX-format Nikon bodies, but there’s one major problem – or in fact several to be precise.

The big issue facing the DX 16-85mm VR is the actual Nikkor lens catalogue itself: Nikon now offers an unusually wide range of general-purpose lenses for its DX-format bodies, including several highly respectable kit lenses. As such a new general-purpose lens like this needs to stand out from the crowd, and while the DX 16-85mm VR is undoubtedly very good, there may not be sufficiently compelling reasons to either upgrade to it from a kit lens or choose it over an alternative model. So before wrapping-up, how does it compare?

Compared to Nikkor DX 18-55mm VR

 
 
 
 

We’ll start with the Nikkor DX 18-55mm VR, the kit lens supplied with Nikon’s entry-level DSLRs like the D60. Nikon’s done a great job with this model which delivers surprisingly good quality and features for the money. It’s a budget lens, but offers decent quality along with SWM focusing and Vibration Reduction.

In its favour, the DX 16-85mm VR zooms both wider and longer, while boasting a metal lens mount with rubber sealing, the choice of Normal or Active VR, a focus distance window and an end element which doesn’t rotate while focusing.

These are all good reasons to go for the DX 16-85mm VR if you’re thinking of upgrading from the DX 18-55mm VR kit lens, but if you’re happy with 27mm coverage at the wide-end, the DX 18-200mm VR super-zoom may ultimately be a more compelling upgrade, or you could simply complement the kit lens with the excellent DX 55-200mm VR telephoto zoom. See our Nikkor DX 18-55mm VR and Nikkor DX 55-200mm VR reviews for more details.

Compared to Nikkor DX 18-70mm

 
 
 
The DX 18-70mm earned a reputation as the general-purpose lens for discerning Nikon owners who didn’t want to stretch to models like the DX 17-55mm f2.8. With decent optics, a metal lens mount, focus distance window and non-rotating front section at an affordable price it was a great choice and an ideal partner for the 70-300mm telephoto zoom. The DX 16-85mm VR is arguably the successor to this lens, aimed at those who want a step-up from a kit lens, but who are happy to also carry a longer telephoto zoom where necessary.

The DX 16-85mm VR features most of what’s good about the DX 18-70mm, but additionally features a wider and longer range along with Vibration Reduction, although the focal ratio when zoomed-in is a little darker. The enhancements remain worthy though, but there’s still the matter of it costing roughly twice the price. Existing owners of the DX 18-70mm could justify an upgrade if they really want 24mm coverage and VR, but if you can live without them and are still after a quality twin lens kit, the DX 18-70mm could be a bargain while stocks last. We compared its build and optical quality in our Nikkor general-purpose lens group test.

Compared to Nikkor DX 18-135mm

 
 
 
The DX 18-135mm was launched with the Nikon D80 body as its standard kit zoom, and it continues to boast one of the longest ranges of any kit lens. It may not zoom as wide as the DX 16-85mm VR, but it does zoom considerably closer – in fact over half as close again – giving it much greater flexibility in the telephoto stakes. It doesn’t however sport VR, which can be a problem at those longer focal lengths.

In its favour, the DX 16-85mm VR zooms wider and features VR, while additionally sporting a metal lens mount with rubber sealing and a focus distance window. It’s a classier lens, but the shorter focal length is a hard one to swallow if you’re looking to upgrade from the DX 18-135mm.

It also costs around half the price of the DX 16-85mm VR, making it a possibility for DX-format owners who want a budget general-purpose lens with a decent range. We compared its build and optical quality in our Nikkor general-purpose lens group test.

Compared to Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR

 
 
 
The Nikkor DX 18-105mm VR was launched with the Nikon D90 as its standard kit lens, and while it loses 30mm at the telephoto end to the DX 18-135mm (above), it now crucially offers VR to combat camera-shake. That’s a trade most people would be happy to make, and it still has a longer focal length than the DX 16-85mm VR.

In its favour, the DX 16-85mm VR zooms wider, while additionally sporting a metal lens mount with rubber sealing and a focus distance window. In our tests it also performed slightly better optically, although it certainly wasn’t the difference between night and day.

Again if you already own the DX 18-105mm VR and are looking to upgrade, you’ll lose out a little at the telephoto end when switching to the DX 16-85mm VR, so the question is how much do you want that 24mm equivalent coverage? As for those who own neither, the DX 18-105mm VR offers a decent range with stabilisation at around half the price of the DX 16-85mm VR, so is another good choice for those on a budget who don’t need 24mm coverage. See the design and results pages in this review for more details.

Compared to Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR

 
 
 
The Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR is one of the most popular lenses for owners of Nikon DX-format bodies, and for very good reason: it delivers a highly compelling combination of a long zoom range, Vibration Reduction and good optical and build quality. This single lens could fulfil most of your requirements without the inconvenience of carrying multiple lenses and the risk of dust when you change them. Like the DX 16-85mm VR, it additionally features a metal lens mount and focus distance window, but of course the big difference is having a maximum focal length that’s two and a third times longer.

In its favour the DX 16-85mm VR zooms wider and is both smaller and lighter; it also enjoys slightly better optical quality, but again it's not the difference of night and day. Depending on where you shop, the DX 16-85mm VR may also be available a little cheaper, but again not by a huge margin. So minor differences in quality, price, size and weight aside, it really boils down to whether zooming out to 24mm is more important to you than zooming-into 200mm. Most would happily accept the slightly less wide 27mm coverage of the DX 18-200mm VR and revel in its considerably longer reach for roughly the same money.

But of course that’s assuming you’re after a single lens solution – some may prefer a shorter range lens to complement a telephoto zoom like the 70-300mm or 80-400mm, for which the DX 16-85mm VR would be ideal. But there’s no denying the draw of the Nikkor super-zoom which continues to make it the most popular choice for DX body owners looking for a new general-purpose lens – see our Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR review for more details.


Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR final verdict

As we said at the start of this page, the Nikkor DX 16-85mm VR is a quality general-purpose lens which delivers a useful range with decent optical and build quality, along with Vibration Reduction to combat camera-shake. In other lens catalogues, it would be a no-brainer for anyone looking to upgrade a kit lens or equip a new body with a quality option from day-one. But not all lens catalogues share Nikon’s wide array of general-purpose options for DX-bodies.

There are two main problems facing the DX 16-85mm VR: first is the simple fact Nikon’s current kit lenses are already pretty good so there’s less urgency to upgrade them, and secondly there’s the highly compelling DX 18-200mm VR available for only a little extra.

Tackling the first point, there’s little in the way of features offered by the DX 16-85mm VR that’s not already available on the current kit lenses. They already feature VR and SWM focusing and share the same f3.5-5.6 focal ratio, and while the build and optical quality are a step-up on the DX 16-85mm VR, it’s certainly not the difference of night and day, especially when compared against the DX 18-105mm VR. Sure there’s bigger differences when comparing the DX 18-55mm VR which has a rotating front section for instance, but how many owners of this or the DX 18-105mm VR really curse the absence of a metal lens mount or a focus distance window? More crucially if you own the DX 18-105mm VR or the earlier DX 18-135mm, it’s a bitter-sweet experience upgrading to a general-purpose lens which doesn’t zoom as close.

Moving onto the second point, the Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR is a tough rival costing only a little more, but boasting a much longer optical zoom range. If the DX 16-85mm VR were cheaper or significantly better, it would be a different story, but it’s uncomfortably priced at a similar point, and most would find an extra 115mm on the telephoto end more useful than an extra 2mm at the wide end.

So it ultimately boils down to how much you want or need 24mm equivalent coverage at the wide-end of your general-purpose lens. While it may only be 3mm wider in equivalent coverage to the wealth of Nikkor DX lenses which start at 18mm, it really does make a big difference. You can capture comfortably larger fields-of-view and enjoy perspective effects which aren’t as dramatic at even slightly longer focal lengths. As mentioned above, the range is also an ideal match for a twin-lens kit which includes either the 70-300mm or 80-400mm models.

The counter-argument though is you could always enjoy 24mm coverage as part of an ultra-wide zoom range instead, or really go for broke with the 10.5mm fisheye. There’s certainly no lack of options for owners of DX-format bodies and you can view and compare the whole range in our Nikkor lens catalogue.

The bottom line is if you’re looking for a quality general-purpose DX-format lens which zooms-out to an equivalent of 24mm, then the DX 16-85mm VR is the model to go for and easily comes Recommended. It misses out on our Highly Recommended award though due to a lack of really compelling advantages beyond existing models and the fact you can buy the DX 18-200mm VR for only a little extra. As such our advice is to think very carefully about what you really need from your general-purpose lens and how it might fit into a kit now and in the future. Feel free to discuss your options in the Nikon section of the Cameralabs forum.




Good points

Flexible range with 24mm wide-angle.
Effective Vibration Reduction.
Relatively quick and quiet SWM focusing.
Metal lens mount with rubber sealing.

Bad points
Telephoto shorter than some kit zooms.
Barrel shadow at 16mm with popup flash.
DX 18-200mm VR available at similar price.
Reports of undesirable bokeh around 50mm.




Scores

(relative to DX kit lenses)
 

Build quality:
Optical quality:
Specification:
Value:

Overall:

21 / 25
21 / 25
21 / 25
19 / 25

82%


If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2014 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs