Support me by shopping at B&H!
Fujifilm X20 Ken McMahon, October 2013
 
 

Fujifilm X20 vs Sony RX100 II vs Nikon COOLPIX A Noise RAW

Support me by
shopping below



 
  Fujifilm X20 results
1 Fujifilm X20 Quality JPEG
2 Fujifilm X20 Quality RAW
3 Fujifilm X20 Noise JPEG
4 Fujifilm X20 Noise RAW
5 Fujifilm X20 Sample images

To compare RAW noise levels under real-life conditions, I shot this scene with the Fujifilm X20, the Sony RX100 II, and the Nikon COOLPIX A within a few moments of each other using their RAW modes at each of their ISO sensitivity settings.

The Fujifilm X20 and Sony RX100 II were set to their maximum 28mm equivalent wide angle field of view to match the 28mm equivalent fixed lens on the Nikon COOLPIX A.

The cameras were set to Aperture Priority exposure mode with the ISO sensitivity set manually.



The above shot was taken with the Fujifim X20 in Aperture priority mode. The camera was mounted on a tripod and tonal enhancement features were left on their default settings. As usual, the crops are taken from the areas marked by the red rectangle.

I processed the files in Adobe Camera RAW using identical settings: Sharpening at 70 / 0.5 / 36 / 10, Luminance and Colour Noise Reduction both set to zero, and the Process to 2012 with the Adobe Standard profile. These settings were chosen to reveal the differences in sensor quality and isolate them from in-camera processing. The high degree of sharpening with a small radius enhances the finest details without causing undesirable artefacts, while the zero noise reduction unveils what's really going on behind the scenes - as such the visible noise levels at higher ISOs will be much greater than you're used to seeing in many of my comparisons, but again it's an approach that's designed to show the actual detail that's being recorded before you start work on processing and cleaning it up if desired.

These RAW results pretty much bear out what we saw with the JPEGs and there are no real surprises. They also confirm what you'd expect to see based purely on the physical size of the sensors. The Nikon COOLPIX A has the lowest noise levels, followed by the Sony RX100 II and then then the Fujifilm X20. One other important difference is that COOLPIX A offers RAW shooting throughout its sensitivity range, as does the Sony RX100 II, albeit with a lower top setting of 12800 ISO (for 25600 ISO you need to switch to Multi Frame Noise Reduction mode). The Fujifilm X20, however, only goes up to 3200 ISO. Do remember the caveats noted on the previous page concerning maximum apertures where a brighter lens can allow lower ISOs under the same lighting and the same shutter speed. This allows the X20 to use lower ISOs than its rivals, especially when zoomed-in, but again any advantage in its light gathering can be over-turned by the benefit of a bigger sensor.

Now head over to my Fujifilm X20 sample images to see some more real-life shots in a variety of conditions.


Fujifilm X20 RAW
 
Sony RX100 II RAW
 
Nikon COOLPIX A RAW

100 ISO

100 ISO
100 ISO
160 ISO N/A
160 ISO
160 ISO N/A
         
200 ISO
200 ISO
200 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
3200 ISO
3200 ISO
3200 ISO
6400 ISO Not Available
6400 ISO
6400 ISO
12800 ISO Not Available
12800 ISO
12800 ISO
25600 ISO Not Available
25600 ISO Not Available
25600 ISO


Fujifilm X20
results : Quality / RAW quality / Noise / RAW Noise


If you found this review useful, please support me by shopping below!
 
 
Photographing the 4th Dimension: time
eBook by Jim M Goldstein
Price: $20 USD (PDF download)
More details!

A great-looking and highly informative eBook for anyone interested in long exposure photography. Whether you're into painting with light, capturing star-trails or creating timelapse video, author Jim M Goldstein has the answers. One of my favourite eBooks to date and one you'll want in your collection even if it's just to browse the great images.
     
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2014 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs