|
Fujifilm Finepix HS20 EXR |
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V |
Canon PowerShot SX30 IS |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 100 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 80 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
f4, 80 ISO |
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR: JPEG versus RAW
The crop on the left is from the JPEG image produced in the camera. To produce the other two crops we opened the RAF (RAW) file in the Raw File Converter utility supplied on CD with the FinePix HS20 EXR which is based on Silkypix. The RAW image was 'developed' and saved as an 8 bit TIFF and the crop was saved using the same Photoshop JPEG High preset as for all our other image quality crops. The centre crop was developed using the Silkypix default settings and, if nothing else, shows what an excellent job the FinePix HS20 EXR's processing does to produce good quality JPEG images with the maximum amount of detail and sharpness possible. Using the default settings, the processed image produced by Silkypix is comparitively poor with much less detail. The crop on the right was produced by easing off the noise reduction and increasing the sharpness settings to try and squeeze a little more detail from the image, but the attempt proved unsuccessful, the third crop isn't actually all that different from the second one produced using the Silkypix defaults. That isn't to say you couldn't get a better result from the Finepix HS20 EXR RAW files, perhaps with more time or different software, but from these results it looks like it's going to take considerable effort to improve on the camera-produced JPEGs. |
Fujifilm Finepix HS20 EXR: in-camera JPEG |
Fujifilm Finepix HS20 EXR: RAW with SilkyPix |
Fujifilm Finepix HS20 EXR: RAW with enhancements |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 100 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |