Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 






Follow my RSS feed at Camera Labs RSS Feed
 
  Latest camera reviews

Canon SX520 HS
Canon G1 X Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Panasonic TZ60 / ZS40
Sony RX100 III review
Sony A3000 review
Canon EOS 1200D T5
Sony WX350
Nikon P600
Sony Alpha A5000
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V
Panasonic Lumix GH4
Panasonic TS5 FT5
Sony Alpha A6000
Canon SX700 HS
Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TOUGH TG2
Nikon AW1
Nikon D3300
Fujifilm XT1
Olympus STYLUS 1
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Olympus OMD EM1
Panasonic Lumix GM1
Nikon D610
Sony Alpha A7
Nikon D5300
Canon PowerShot A2500
Sony Alpha A7r
Canon ELPH 130 IXUS 140
Nikon COOLPIX P520
Nikon COOLPIX L820
Canon PowerShot S120
Panasonic Lumix GX7
Canon SX510 HS
Canon PowerShot G16
Fujifilm X20
Panasonic FZ70 / FZ72
Canon EOS 70D
Sony RX100 II
Canon ELPH 330 IXUS 255
Panasonic Lumix GF6
Fujifilm XM1
Olympus EP5
Panasonic Lumix LF1
Panasonic TZ35 / ZS25
Olympus XZ2
Sony HX300
Panasonic Lumix G6
Sony HX50V
Fujifilm X100S
Canon SX280 HS
Canon EOS SL1 / 100D
Panasonic TZ40 / ZS30
Nikon D7100
Nikon COOLPIX A
Fujifilm X-E1
Canon EOS 6D
Nikon D5200
Panasonic Lumix GH3
Canon PowerShot S110
Panasonic Lumix G5
Sony NEX-6
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Nikon COOLPIX P7700
Olympus E-PL5
Canon EOS M
Panasonic TS20 / FT20
Canon PowerShot G15
Nikon D600
Nikon COOLPIX L810
Canon PowerShot D20
Sony RX100
Panasonic Lumix LX7
Canon SX500 IS
Fujifilm HS30 EXR
Sony HX200V
Panasonic FZ60 / FZ62
Canon 520HS / 500HS
Canon 110HS / 125HS
Nikon D800
Canon EOS T4i / 650D
Canon PowerShot A3400
Panasonic ZS15 / TZ25
Olympus E-M5
Nikon D3200
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Canon PowerShot A2300
Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Nikon D7000
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D

All camera reviews
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikon lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join my Camera forum and let everyone know!
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Support me by shopping at Amazon!
Canon IXUS 130 / PowerShot SD1400 IS Gordon Laing, May 2010

Canon IXUS 130 / PowerShot SD1400 IS results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise


Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 High ISO Noise (default Program settings)

 
Support this site by shopping below


 
To compare noise levels under real-life conditions we shot this scene with the Canon IXUS 130 / PowerShot SD1400 IS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 within a few moments of each other using their best-quality JPEG settings and at each of their ISO settings.

The lenses were adjusted to deliver as close a field-of-view as possible; the best match was with the Sony a fraction wider, hence the slighter larger area in its crops. Each camera was set to Program to see how they performed with default settings, although DRO was disabled this time on the Sony as it can introduce noise.


The image above was taken with the Canon IXUS 130 / PowerShot SD1400 IS in Program mode at 80 ISO with an exposure of 0.5 seconds and the lens set to 7mm f3.5; the original file measured 2.86MB. The crops below are taken from the area marked with the red rectangle and presented here at 100%.

At their lowest sensitivities of 80 ISO, both cameras deliver detailed and fairly clean results. Look closely and pixel-peepers will notice the usual fine textures common across all compacts these days, even at their lowest ISO settings, but most people would be perfectly happy with the results in this first row of crops. As seen on the previous page, the Sony Cyber-shot W350 is applying greater sharpening and contrast, even with the Dynamic Range Optimiser disabled for this low light test. This doesn't make it better – it's just a different approach to image processing and the choice between it and the Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS at this point is entirely personal.

At 100 ISO the Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS delivers essentially the same result as it did at 80 ISO. Sure the textures have become fractionally greater, but that's getting into serious pixel-peeping. In contrast though, the Sony Cyber-shot W350's image quality has taken quite a hit in the small jump from 80 to 100 ISO. Noise levels have noticeably increased, the image looks softer overall and fine details are already being lost. Again there's a fair amount of pixel-peeping going on here, and most wouldn't notice any negative impact on prints, but when examining at 100%, it's clear the Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS enjoys a visible advantage at 100 ISO.

At 200 ISO there's a drop in quality on both models, but this time it's the Canon which suffers from a bigger drop compared to its previous setting – the IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS looks noticeably less crisp than it did at 100 ISO. But the Canon result at 200 ISO remains preferable to that from the Sony which is becoming increasingly plagued by noise and processing artefacts.

With the sensitivity set to 400 ISO, both cameras are becoming steadily fuzzier and losing more subtle details, especially in terms of tone – for example, the markings on the organ pipes are much less defined than at lower sensitivities. We'd still say the Canon enjoys and edge here, but it's smaller than before with both cameras being quite close in overall quality at this point.

At 800 ISO, the Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS has begun to really suffer with a loss of fine detail and an overall softness to the image. In turn, the Sony W350 has become quite patchy, but while its stronger contrast and sharpness by default makes the artefacts more obvious, we prefer its output at this point to the Canon.

Likewise at 1600 ISO where the Sony W350's punchier-looking image processing gives it the impression of a superior result. Look closely though and you'll see both cameras are roughly neck-in-neck on actual detail, but we personally prefer the Sony result. This is personal though and you may prefer the Canon.

The IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS tops-out at 1600 ISO, but offers a Low Light scene preset which significantly drops the resolution in an attempt to reduce visible noise. It works too when viewed at 100%, but of course when printed or viewed the same size, the artefacts on the normal 1600 ISO version will appear smaller and less obvious.

The Sony W350 bravely offers a 3200 ISO option at its full resolution, and while it's unsurprisingly very noisy at this point, it may be acceptable for emergency situations.

So an interesting result here with no clear winner overall. Both cameras start looking roughly the same at 80 ISO, but the Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS enjoys a noticeable lead at 100 and 200 ISO, and a small edge at 400 ISO. At 800 ISO and above though, the Sony W350 comes back with results we personally preferred to the Canon; this is however a personal preference and you may think the Canon still looks better. If you think you'll be shooting at 400 ISO or lower, then the Canon IXUS 130 / SD1400 IS will be the preferred choice, but if you regularly shoot in low light at 800 ISO and above, you may prefer the Sony W350.

Check out our Sample Images Gallery for more examples across the Canon's sensitivity range, or if you've already seen enough, head on over to our verdict!


Canon IXUS 130 / PowerShot SD1400 IS
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
80 ISO
80 ISO
     
100 ISO
100 ISO
     
200 ISO
200 ISO
     
400 ISO
400 ISO
     
800 ISO
800 ISO
     
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
     
Low Light preset (here at 1600 ISO)
3200 ISO

Canon IXUS 130 / PowerShot SD1400 IS results : Real-life resolution / High ISO Noise



If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2014 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs