The image above was taken with the Canon PowerShot G9 at 10mm f4 and with a sensitivity of 80 ISO; the original JPEG measured 5.93MB. The original image used for the EOS 400D / XTi crops was taken at 25mm f8 with a sensitivity of 100 ISO and measured 4.21MB. The apertures selected were the sharpest for each lens. The crops are taken from the upper left, centre and lower right portions of the originals and presented here at 100%.

At first glance the G9's crops viewed at 100% appear sharper than the 400D / XTi samples, but much of this is due to the textured effect of finely grained noise. The 400D / XTi crops at 100 ISO are virtually bereft of noise and therefore look much smoother. That said, the middle crop of the buildings does show a genuine advantage to the G9 - the 400D / XTi crop may have lower noise and a smoother appearance, but there's no denying the G9 has captured slightly more detail.

Examining the first row of crops from the mountain ridge does show the G9's optics suffering a little in the corners compared to the 400D / XTi, although to be fair, the G9's crop represents its extreme corner, whereas the 400D / XTi crop is taken slightly in from the edge of its wider frame. Jumping to the third crop taken from the golf course shows a similar effect from the G9, becoming softer in the corners, although this time the 400D / XTi is far from perfect too.

Ultimately, while the G9 can become soft in its extreme corners and there's visible noise even at low ISOs, it is capable of recording an impressive degree of detail. Shooting in RAW also gives you greater latitude for tweaking and applying more sophisticated noise reduction if desired. And speaking of RAW, scroll down to the bottom of this page to see how it compares to a JPEG file generated in-camera.