Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 






Follow my RSS feed at Camera Labs RSS Feed
 
  Latest camera reviews

Sigma DP1 Quattro
Sony Cyber-shot W830
Nikon COOLPIX L830
Nikon D750
Canon SX400 IS
Sony Cyber-shot H400
Panasonic Lumix LX100
Canon SX60 HS
Canon ELPH 340 IXUS 265
Canon G7X
Nikon COOLPIX P530
Canon SX520 HS
Canon G1 X Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Panasonic TZ60 / ZS40
Sony RX100 III review
Sony A3000 review
Canon EOS 1200D T5
Sony WX350
Nikon P600
Sony Alpha A5000
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V
Panasonic Lumix GH4
Panasonic TS5 FT5
Sony Alpha A6000
Canon SX700 HS
Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TOUGH TG2
Nikon AW1
Nikon D3300
Fujifilm XT1
Olympus STYLUS 1
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Olympus OMD EM1
Panasonic Lumix GM1
Nikon D610
Sony Alpha A7
Nikon D5300
Canon PowerShot A2500
Sony Alpha A7r
Canon ELPH 130 IXUS 140
Nikon COOLPIX P520
Nikon COOLPIX L820
Canon PowerShot S120
Panasonic Lumix GX7
Canon SX510 HS
Canon PowerShot G16
Fujifilm X20
Panasonic FZ70 / FZ72
Canon EOS 70D
Sony RX100 II
Canon ELPH 330 IXUS 255
Panasonic Lumix GF6
Fujifilm XM1
Olympus EP5
Panasonic Lumix LF1
Panasonic TZ35 / ZS25
Olympus XZ2
Sony HX300
Panasonic Lumix G6
Sony HX50V
Fujifilm X100S
Canon SX280 HS
Canon EOS SL1 / 100D
Panasonic TZ40 / ZS30
Nikon D7100
Nikon COOLPIX A
Fujifilm X-E1
Canon EOS 6D
Nikon D5200
Panasonic Lumix GH3
Canon PowerShot S110
Panasonic Lumix G5
Sony NEX-6
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Nikon COOLPIX P7700
Olympus E-PL5
Canon EOS M
Panasonic TS20 / FT20
Canon PowerShot G15
Nikon D600
Nikon COOLPIX L810
Canon PowerShot D20
Sony RX100
Panasonic Lumix LX7
Canon SX500 IS
Fujifilm HS30 EXR
Sony HX200V
Panasonic FZ60 / FZ62
Canon 520HS / 500HS
Canon 110HS / 125HS
Nikon D800
Canon EOS T4i / 650D
Canon PowerShot A3400
Panasonic ZS15 / TZ25
Olympus E-M5
Nikon D3200
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Canon PowerShot A2300
Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Nikon D7000
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D

All camera reviews
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikon lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join my Camera forum and let everyone know!
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Support me when shopping at Amazon by clicking through to them here! The prices are the same, but they share some profit, and that's what pays for my work! Thanks, Gordon
Canon PowerShot G9 Gordon Laing, October 2007

Canon PowerShot G9 results :
Outdoor resolution / Studio resolution / Real life Noise

Support this site by price checking below

Canon 400D / Rebel XTi - front view
Canon PowerShot G9 vs Canon EOS 400D / Rebel XTi real-life noise

To compare noise levels under real-life conditions we shot this scene with the Canon PowerShot G9 and Canon EOS 400D / XTi within a few moments using each of their ISO settings. The EOS 400D / XTi was fitted with the EF-S 18-55mm kit lens.

The PowerShot G9 image was shot in its native 4:3 aspect ratio, and the zoom of the EOS 400D / XTi adjusted to deliver the same vertical coverage. Since the 400D / XTi crops below are taken from the same 4:3 area as the G9, it's effectively being treated here as an 8.9 Megapixel 4:3 camera.

The image above was taken with the Canon PowerShot G9 at 10mm f4 and at 80 ISO; the original measured 5.15MB. The crops are taken from an area just below and to the left of the centre.

Comparing the crops below, it's clear the PowerShot G9 can capture a large amount of real-life detail at its lowest ISO settings. The fencing and foliage areas in particular reveal finer details on the low ISO G9 crops than on the corresponding one from the EOS 400D / XTi - although as noted above, we're only effectively using 8.9 of the 400D / XTi's 10 Megapixels when comparing 4:3 frames, so the G9's 12.1 Megapixels should be capturing more.

It's also clear the G9's low ISO crops look sharper, but much of this is due to the optical effect of background noise compared to the smoother results of the 400D / XTi; certainly you can increase the sharpening on the 400D /XTi crops for a punchier result if desired.

It doesn't take long though before the G9's noise levels become obtrusive - they're already visible at 100 ISO, but begin to have a detrimental effect at 200 ISO and above. Theres big drops in quality at 400 and 800 ISO, although they'd still be acceptable at smaller print sizes - remember these are 12.1 Megapixel images so any artefacts would appear quite small when printed. At 1600 ISO the quality becomes much worse though and this should only be selected for emergency use.

Ultimately in terms of noise the PowerShot G9 performs similarly to its predecessor (see our PowerShot G7 noise results), which isn't bad considering the increase in resolution. We're also pleased to see noise reduction has been kept in check and is relatively modest compared to many models - a fair degree of detail is still present at mid to higher ISOs, allowing you to successfully apply third party noise reduction later if desired. The ability to shoot in RAW gives you even greater flexibility.

That said, still don't expect miracles at 400 ISO and above. Like all non-DSLRs, try to use the G9 at 200 ISO or ideally lower still for the best results. For more real-life examples across its sensitivity range, check out our Canon PowerShot G9 Gallery, but first scroll to the bottom of this page to see how the G9 handles highlight details compared to the 400D / XTi.

Canon PowerShot G9
 
Canon EOS 400D / XTi with EF-S 18-55mm
Canon PowerShot G9 at 80 ISO    
80 ISO
 
80 ISO not available
     
Canon PowerShot G9 at 100 ISO   Canon EOS 400D / XTi at 100 ISO
100 ISO
 
100 ISO
     
Canon PowerShot G9 at 200 ISO   Canon EOS 400D / XTi at 200 ISO
200 ISO
 
200 ISO
     
Canon PowerShot G9 at 400 ISO   Canon EOS 400D / XTi at 400 ISO
400 ISO
 
400 ISO
     
Canon PowerShot G9 at 800 ISO   Canon EOS 400D / XTi at 800 ISO
800 ISO
 
800 ISO
     
Canon PowerShot G9 at 1600 ISO   Canon EOS 400D / XTi at 1600 ISO
1600 ISO
 
1600 ISO
     
Canon PowerShot G9 at 3200 ISO (2MP scaled up)    
3200 ISO (2 Megapixels, scaled-up here)
 
3200 ISO not available


Canon PowerShot G9 vs Canon EOS 400D / Rebel XTi highlights and dynamic range

Just before wrapping up here, we'd like to show you an additional pair of crops taken from the snowy mountain-top area of each 100 ISO sample. As you can see from the crops above, while the white balance is slightly different, the exposures were closely matched for the area with the buildings used for our real-life noise crops. But if you compare the bright highlight areas of each sample, considerable differences become apparent.

It's clear from the crops below the G9 has saturated many highlight areas losing tonal detail, whereas the 400D / XTi has retained considerably greater tonal detail. This is due to many factors including image processing and the contrast of the lens, but the biggest influence here is the difference in sensor area. The area of a DSLR sensor is considerably greater than that in a point and shoot camera like the G9, and this allows it to not only enjoy lower noise, but also a higher tonal dynamic range.

Reducing the exposure on the G9 could retrieve highlight detail, but at the cost of darker shadow areas. The only way it could match or exceed the tonal detail of a DSLR is by combining multiple exposures with HDR software. It's important to note this is not an exclusive criticism of the G9 by any means - it applies to all non-DSLRs. But it's equally important to understand the benefits of a DSLR if you're weighing up the two.

For more real-life examples across its sensitivity range, check out our Canon PowerShot G9 Gallery.


Canon PowerShot G9
 
Canon EOS 400D / XTi with EF-S 18-55mm
Canon PowerShot G9 at 100 ISO   Canon EOS 400D / XTi at 100 ISO
100 ISO
 
100 ISO



Canon PowerShot G9 results

Outdoor resolution / Studio resolution / Real life Noise
If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2014 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs