|
Canon PowerShot G11 with built-in lens |
Olympus E-P1 with Lumix G 20mm f1.7 |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 with Lumix G 20mm f1.7 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 100 ISO
|
f4, 100 ISO |
| We photographed the scene pictured above using the G11's RAW plus Large Fine JPEG mode, allowing us to directly compare images created from exactly the same data.
Below are crops taken from the original JPEG file alongside the RAW version, processed in Canon's Digital Photo Professional software. The default settings produced a softer result than the in-camera JPEG, so we've boosted the sharpness to 7 to see what detail can be brought-out. The boost in sharpening has certainly brought out a little extra detail on the converted RAW file, albeit with some minor sharpening artefacts as a result. Looking at the entire image, we’d say the converted RAW file certainly has the edge over the in-camera JPEG, and some minor adjustments in DPP could get the balance just right. RAW recording is one of the important features of the G11, but while it actually makes little difference with some compacts, there’s a visible benefit to using it here. Now let's look at how the camera performs across its sensitivity range in our Canon PowerShot G11 High ISO Noise results. |
Canon PowerShot G11: JPEG |
Canon PowerShot G11: RAW
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
f4, 80 ISO |
f4, 80 ISO |
If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!