Support me when shopping at Amazon by clicking through to them here! The prices are the same, but they share some profit, and that's what pays for my work! Thanks, Gordon
Canon PowerShot A2300 Ken McMahon, May 2012
 
 

Canon PowerShot A2300 vs Canon PowerShot A3400 IS Noise

Support me by
shopping below



 
  PowerShot A2300 results
1 PowerShot A2300 Quality
3 PowerShot A2300 Noise
5 PowerShot A2300 Sample images

To compare noise levels under real-life conditions I shot this scene with the Canon PowerShot A2300 and PowerShot A3400 IS within a few moments of each other using their best 16 Megapixel resolution at each of their ISO sensitivity settings.

The cameras were set to Program auto exposure mode, the lenses were set to the same field of view and the ISO sensitivity was set manually.


The above shot was taken with the Canon PowerShot A2300. The lens was set to its maximum 5mm wide angle position which provides a similar field of view to the 5-25mm lens on the PowerShot A3400 IS. For these tests the camera was placed on a tripod. The A2300 doesn't have image stabilisation, but the A3400 IS does and for this test it was disabled. i-Contrast was left in the default off position on both cameras. In Program auto mode the A2300 chose an exposure of 1/5 at f2.8 at 100 ISO

As we saw in the outdoors test, even at the base 100 ISO sensitivity setting there's visible noise in the 100 percent crop from the PowerShot A2300. As a result the edges of the memorial frame already look a bit indistinct and there's a coarse granularity to the flat colour of the cream wall. There's also a distinct purple patchiness to parts of the image which varies from crop to crop.

At 200 ISO, there's a marginal increase in the noise levels, but at anything less that 100 percent view you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between 100 and 200 ISO. At 400 ISO, though, detail is beginning to break up and the horizontal highlight running along the top of the memorial above the text area is spreading beyond its bounds. This is still a good enough result to get by at less than 100 percent view though.

At 800 ISO things take a dramatic downturn. Both the noise and processing to reduce it have ratcheted up and the result is a corresponding worsening in image quality with all but the coarsest detail losing out in consequence. You don't have to be pixel peeping at 100 percent view to see a difference in quality between the 100 and 800 ISO images, though this and the 1600 ISO shot are fine for web viewing at small sizes, they're not suitable for everyday shooting and are best reserved for 'must have' low light shooting. The Low light scene mode produces slightly better results at automatically selected high ISO settings, but at a reduced 4 Megapixel resolution.

Compared with the PowerShot A3400 IS there's not a lot in it - as indeed you'd expect from cameras sporting the same sensor. The crops may look qualitatively a little different but the degree of noise and processing artefacts is about the same. As in the outdoor test the PowerShot A3400 IS crops are slightly sharper, which reveals better detail in the 100 and 200 ISO crops, but once you move up the ISO range it translates into an unpleasant harshness. You can't see any more detail in the 800 ISO crop from the A3400 IS than the A2300 one - the clumpiness is just harder edged.

Now head over to my PowerShot A2300 sample images to see some more real-life shots in a variety of conditions.


Canon PowerShot A2300
 
CanonPowerShot A3400 IS
100 ISO
100 ISO
200 ISO
200 ISO
400 ISO
400 ISO
800 ISO
800 ISO
     
1600 ISO
1600 ISO
     
     
Low light 1250 ISO
Low light 1000 ISO

Canon PowerShot A2300 results : Quality/ Noise



If you found this review useful, please support me by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2014 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs