Canon EF 24-105mm chromatic aberration and fringing, tested with EOS 5D
|
 |
|
To measure purple fringing caused
by lens chromatic aberrations and sensor blooming, we photographed a test
chart, left, with areas of very high contrast. We tested each lens at its
widest and longest focal lengths with the aperture wide open using a Canon
EOS-5D in Aperture Priority mode. The crops are taken from the upper left
corner of the chart and presented here at 100%.
All three lenses exhibited small degrees of fringing at wide angle, although
nothing to be concerned about. Zoomed-in to their longest focal lengths,
the EF 24-70 and EF 17-40mm delivered very clean results, leaving the EF 24-105 with
a small amount of fringing - again, little to be concerned about though. |
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM |
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM |
|
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM |
|
|
|
|
|
24-105mm at 24mm f4 |
|
24-70mm at 24mm f2.8 |
|
17-40mm at 17mm f4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24-105mm at 105mm f4 |
|
24-70mm at 70mm f2.8 |
|
17-40mm at 40mm f4 |
Canon EF 24-105mm macro, tested with EOS 5D
To measure macro performance we photographed a chart using settings which
delivered the maximum possible reproduction. The dark lines are 10mm apart.
Each lens was tested with the Canon EOS-5D at f8 in Aperture Priority mode.
Of the three lenses, the older EF 24-70mm delivered the maximum close-up reproduction.
That said, none of the three can really be described as impressive performers
when it comes to macro work. In its favour though, the EF 24-105mm lens delivered
a less geometrically distorted image than the EF 24-70mm when focused as close
as it was able. |
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM |
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM |
|
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM |
|
|
|
|
|
24-105mm at 105mm f8
Max area of 154x104mm |
|
24-70mm at 70mm f8
Max area of 130x90mm |
|
17-40mm at 40mm f8
Max area of 166x110mm |
|
