Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Olympus 'PEN' E-P1
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FS25
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony Cyber-shot W270/290
Canon PowerShot A2100IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Canon IXUS 980 / SD990IS
Nikon D3x
Panasonic Lumix GH1
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Fujifilm FinePix F60fd
Olympus Stylus µ 1050 SW
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Pentax Optio W60
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77
Canon PowerShot G10
Canon IXUS 870 / SD 880IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro DSLRs
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4~5.6 IS USM lens review Gordon Laing, December 2005

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting



Click here for the Canon EF-S 17-85mm video tour

Canon EF-S 17-85mm geometry, wide angle

To measure geometric distortion we photographed a custom test chart consisting of a grid pattern with perfectly straight lines. The lenses were tested at their widest focal length with an aperture of f8 using a Canon EOS-350D / Digital Rebel XT in Aperture Priority mode. The images were analysed with Imatest using 5th Order line calculation and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution.

The 17-85mm EF-S exhibits greater barrel distortion than its rivals at their widest focal length, including the budget 18-55mm EF-S model. The 17-40mm EF L performed best in this test.

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4~5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5~5.6
Canon EF 17-40mm f4.0L USM
Canon 17-85mm lens wide angle geometry test
Canon 18-55mm lens wide angle geometry test
Canon 17-40mm lens wide angle geometry test
17-85mm EF-S at 17mm f8
Distortion: 5.71% barrel
  18-55mm EF-S at 18mm f8
Distortion: 3.35% barrel
  17-40mm EF L at 17mm f8
Distortion: 2.9% barrel




Canon EF-S 17-85mm geometry, telephoto

To measure geometric distortion we photographed a custom test chart consisting of a grid pattern with perfectly straight lines. The lenses were tested at their longest focal length with an aperture of f8 using a Canon EOS-350D / Digital Rebel XT in Aperture Priority mode. The images were analysed with Imatest using 5th Order line calculation and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution.

The 17-85mm EF-S exhibits greater pincushion distortion than its rivals at their longest focal length, including the budget 18-55mm EF-S model. Again the 17-40mm EF L turned out the least distorted result.

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4~5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5~5.6
Canon EF 17-40mm f4.0L USM
Canon 17-85mm lens telephoto geometry test
Canon 18-55mm lens telephoto geometry test
Canon 17-40mm lens telephoto geometry test
17-85mm EF-S at 85mm f8
Distortion: 0.967% pincushion
  18-55mm EF-S at 55mm f8
Distortion: 0.389% pincushion
  17-40mm EF L at 40mm f8
Distortion: 0.187% pincushion


Canon 17-85mm results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting


Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores



USA readers



 
UK readers
Jessops discount voucher




All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home