Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
lens rental
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4~5.6 IS USM lens review Gordon Laing, December 2005

Canon EF-S 17-85mm design and build quality

The Canon EF-S 17-85mm is pictured below along-side the Canon 17-40mm L and the Canon EF-S 18-55mm lenses in their shortest positions. Here the three lenses from left to right measure 78x92mm, 83.5x96.8mm and 68.5x66mm (diameter x length) respectively. Clearly while the 17-40mm is the biggest of the three, the 17-85mm is not far behind it and both lenses dwarf the budget 18-55mm.




from left: Canon 17-85mm EF-S, Canon 17-40mm L and Canon 18-55mm EF-S - zoomed out

When zoomed-in to their longest focal lengths, the 17-85mm and 18-55mm lenses extend by 26 and 9mm respectively, while the 17-40mm adjusts its optics internally and doesn't extend at all. The difference between the three lenses when zoomed-in can be seen below.


from left: Canon 17-85mm EF-S, Canon 17-40mm L and Canon 18-55mm EF-S - zoomed in

The two larger lenses are considerably heavier than the budget model. They both weigh-in at 475g (1lb), compared to the almost imperceptible weight of the 18-55mm at just 190g (6.7oz). The filter threads from left to right measure 67, 77 and 58mm respectively.

In terms of build quality the 17-85mm is definitely superior to the 18-55mm, although not quite up to the standard of the 17-40mm L; the latter is also the only one of the three to boast dust and drip-proof construction, although this level of environmental sealing was not offered by any EF-S compatible body at the time of writing.

Both the 17-85mm and 17-40mm feature USM motors for fast and quiet focusing. The 18-55mm is louder and slower in comparison. The 17-85mm and 17-40mm also employ internal focusing, making both lenses polariser-friendly. The 18-55mm lens employs a rotating front element, which makes the use of polarisers frustrating.

A lens hood is optionally available for the EF-S 17-85mm lens. Canon only supplies lens hoods as standard with its L-series lenses. To see how the EF-S 17-85mm measures-up alongside the EF-S 17-55mm, see our Canon EOS 400D / Rebel XTi lens group test.

If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs