Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below


or by shopping via our affiliate stores
- thanks!

RSS Feed Camera Labs RSS Feed




Latest camera reviews

Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700

Pentax K200D
Olympus E-520
Panasonic Lumix FX500

Olympus E-420
Pentax K20D
Canon EOS 450D / XSi
Sony Alpha A350

Panasonic Lumix TZ5

Nikon D60
Sony Alpha A200
Nikon D300
Canon EOS 40D

All reviews ....
   
 
  Latest DSLRs
     



Canon
Olympus
Pentax
Nikon
Panasonic
Sony
     
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Semi-pro / Lenses
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Gordon Laing, August 2006 / updated July 2007

Outdoor
/ Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

Support this site by shopping via these links

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM wide-angle geometry comparison

Canon 17-55mm wide angle geometry test
17-55mm EF-S at 17mm f8
Distortion: 2.87% barrel

 


To measure and compare the Canon 17-55mm's geometric distortion we photographed a test chart consisting of a grid pattern, using it and a number of rival lenses.

The lenses were tested at their widest focal lengths with an aperture of f8 in Aperture Priority mode.

The images were analysed with Imatest using 5th Order line calculation and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution.




The image above was taken with the Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 17mm f8. Barrel distortion was measured at 2.87% which is well below the other EF-S lenses on test and roughly the same as the EF 17-40mm L - this is impressive considering the latter is designed for a full-frame body, so should perform impeccably on an EF-S body.


Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM
Canon 17-85mm wide angle geometry test
Canon 18-55mm wide angle geometry test
Canon 17-40mm wide angle geometry test
17-85mm EF-S at 17mm f8
Distortion: 5.71% barrel
  18-55mm EF-S at 18mm f8
Distortion: 3.35% barrel
  17-40mm EF L at 17mm f8
Distortion: 2.9% barrel



Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM telephoto geometry comparison

Canon 17-55mm telephoto geometry test

17-55mm EF-S at 55mm f8
Distortion: 1.09% pincushion

 

To measure and compare the Canon 17-55mm's geometric distortion we photographed a test chart consisting of a grid pattern, using it and a number of rival lenses.

The lenses were tested at their longest focal lengths with an aperture of f8 in Aperture Priority mode.

The images were analysed with Imatest using 5th Order line calculation and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution.





The image above was taken with the Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 55mm f8. Pincushion distortion was measured at 1.09% which is roughly similar to the EF-S 17-85mm lens, albeit not as good as the budget EF-S 18-55mm, nor, unsurprisingly, the EF 17-40mm.


Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM
Canon 17-85mm telephoto geometry test
Canon 18-55mm telephoto geometry test
Canon 17-40mm telephoto geometry test
17-85mm EF-S at 85mm f8
Distortion: 0.967% pincushion
  18-55mm EF-S at 55mm f8
Distortion: 0.389% pincushion
  17-40mm EF L at 40mm f8
Distortion: 0.187% pincushion

Canon EF-S 17-55mm results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting


Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


USA readers



 
UK readers
Jessops discount voucher


All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2008 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Home