Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below


or by shopping via our affiliate stores
- thanks!

RSS Feed Camera Labs RSS Feed




Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-520
Canon 1000D / XS preview

Sigma DP1
Panasonic Lumix FX500

Olympus E-420
Pentax K20D
Olympus E-3
Sony Alpha A300
Canon EOS 450D / XSi
Sony Alpha A350

Panasonic Lumix FX35

Panasonic Lumix TZ5

Nikon D60
Sony Alpha A200
Nikon D300
Sony Alpha A700
Canon EOS 40D

All reviews ....
   
 
  Latest cameras
     



Canon
Nikon
Panasonic
Sony
FujiFilm
Olympus
Pentax

     
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Semi-pro / Lenses
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Gordon Laing, August 2006 / updated July 2007

Outdoor
/ Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

Outdoor scene: Canon EF-S 18-55mm vs 17-85mm vs 17-55mm vs EF 17-40mm with Canon 400D / XTi

 

To compare real-life performance we shot the same scene with the Canon EF-S 18-55mm, EF-S 17-85mm, EF-S 17-55mm and EF 17-40mm lenses, all set to a focal length of 25mm and an aperture of f8. Each lens was mounted on a Canon EOS 400D / XTi set to 100 ISO and using its best quality JPEG settings. All images were taken within moments of each other.

The image left was taken with the Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 25mm f8, with a sensitivity of 100 ISO; the original Large Fine JPEG measured 4.17MB. The crops are taken from the upper left, centre and lower right portions of the originals and presented here for evaluation at 100%.


The high contrast areas in the upper row of crops have resulted in coloured fringing on all four lenses, although the EF-S 17-55mm also suffers from a higher degree of softness in the extreme corners. This situation greatly improves when you move in even just a little though.

Moving onto the middle row of crops from the center of the image and all four lenses perform similarly, although the EF-S 17-55mm appears to have slightly higher contrast than the other two EF-S models.

In the final row of crops taken from the bottom right corner of the image, the EF-S 17-55mm once again exhibits some softness, although not as much as the EF-S 17-85mm. Unsurprisingly the EF 17-40mm performs well here, although despite being corrected for full-frame bodies it's certainly not leaps ahead of the others - and the EF-S 18-55mm kit lens also turns out a good result. For a complete picture of how the lenses compare under other conditions and in other respects though, be sure to check our other results pages, linked below.


 

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Using Canon 400D / XTi
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6
Using Canon 400D / XTi
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8
Using Canon 400D / XTi
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4
Using Canon 400D / XTi
Canon EF-S 18-55mm - crop 1   Canon EF-S 17-85mm - crop 1   Canon EF-S 17-55mm - crop 1   Canon EF 17-40mm - crop 1
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
             
Canon EF-S 18-55mm - crop 2   Canon EF-S 17-85mm - crop 2   Canon EF-S 17-55mm - crop 2   Canon EF 17-40mm - crop 2
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
             
Canon EF-S 18-55mm - crop 3   Canon EF-S 17-85mm - crop 3   Canon EF-S 17-55mm - crop 3   Canon EF 17-40mm - crop 3
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO
1/250, f8, 100 ISO

Canon EF-S 17-55mm results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting


Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


USA readers



 
UK readers
Jessops discount voucher


All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2008 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Home