Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
lens rental
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Gordon Laing, February 2007

Outdoor
/ Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting

 
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM geometry comparison (shortest focal length)


Canon 10-22mm wide angle geometry test
10-22mm EF-S at 10mm f8 (16mm equiv)
Distortion: 3.59% barrel


  To measure and compare the Canon 10-22mm's geometric distortion we photographed a test chart consisting of a grid pattern, using it and a number of rival lenses.

The lenses were tested at their widest focal lengths with an aperture of f8 using a Canon EOS-400D in Aperture Priority mode.

The images were analysed with Imatest using 5th Order line calculation and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution.
The image above was taken with the Canon EF-S 10-22mm at 10mm f8. Barrel distortion was measured at 3.59% which is remarkably low considering the extreme wide angle coverage at this focal length. It's roughly comparable to the distortion you'll experience with the EF-S 18-55mm when it's zoomed-out, and a significant improvement over the EF-S 17-85mm at 17mm. It's also worth comparing against the EF 17-40mm tested on a full frame body, which delivers coverage almost as wide (17mm actual versus 16mm equivalent). In our EF 17-40mm review, geometric distortion at 17mm on an EOS 5D was measured at 6.39% - considerably higher. An impressive result here for the EF-S 10-22mm.


Support this site by shopping below

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
Canon 17-85mm wide angle geometry test
Canon 18-55mm wide angle geometry test
Canon 17-55mm wide angle geometry test
17-85mm EF-S at 17mm f8
Distortion: 5.71% barrel
  18-55mm EF-S at 18mm f8
Distortion: 3.35% barrel
  17-55mm EF-S at 17mm f8
Distortion: 2.87% barrel



Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM geometry comparison (longest focal length)

Canon 10-22mm telephoto geometry test

10-22mm EF-S at 22mm f8 (35mm equiv)
Distortion: 0.24% barrel

 

To measure and compare the Canon 10-22mm's geometric distortion we photographed a test chart consisting of a grid pattern, using it and a number of rival lenses.

The lenses were tested at their longest focal lengths with an aperture of f8 using a Canon EOS-400D in Aperture Priority mode.

The images were analysed with Imatest using 5th Order line calculation and the full areas presented here at a reduced resolution.





The image above was taken with the Canon EF-S 10-22mm at 22mm f8. While most lenses exhibit pincushion distortion when zoomed-in, the EF-S 10-22mm showed barrelling. This however isn't that surprising considering the lens is still quite wide even when zoomed-in, and more importantly the actual degree of distortion at just 0.24% is very low. Judging from this and the above result, the EF-S 10-22mm is a good performer when it comes to geometric distortion, which will come as a relief to anyone shooting buildings indoors or out.

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
Canon 17-85mm telephoto geometry test
Canon 18-55mm telephoto geometry test
Canon 17-55mm telephoto geometry test
17-85mm EF-S at 85mm f8
Distortion: 0.967% pincushion
  18-55mm EF-S at 55mm f8
Distortion: 0.389% pincushion
  17-55mm EF-S at 55mm f8
Distortion: 1.09% pincushion

Canon EF-S 10-22mm results continued...

Outdoor / Resolution / Corner sharpness / Fringe and macro / Geometry / Vignetting
If you found this review useful, please support us by shopping below!
All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs