|
Assuming it all arrives as expected I just got what I think is a cracking deal on a D70s (£329.99). I considered a D80 or a D50 and also Canon 350D/400D.
I couldn't justify the extra £200 for the D80 (I'd rather spend it on lenses and other bits), I didn't find a D50 much cheaper than I've paid for the D70s and I tried a friend's EOS 400D and wasn't that keen on the size/feel of the thing.
As I've only got a body, I've got to decide what lens(es) to get. I would rather spend a little more and get something worthwhile than essentially waste a couple of hundred on lenses that aren't up-to-scratch. I made that mistake when I bought lenses for my 35mm SLR 13 years ago and was always annoyed with how inadequate they were.
I've read the cameralabs review/comparison of the Sigma, Tamron and Nikon 18-200 lenses. This kind of thing appeals because I take pictures in a variety of situations (sport, landscape, wildlife). What I'm not sure of is whether the Nikon will, in my hands, be noticeably (£250) better than, say, the Sigma.
I'd also be interested to know whether getting the Nikkor DX 18-55 and 55-200 lenses would give me better quality pictures than the Sigma 18-200.
Thanks, Ed
|