Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:19 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:49 pm 
first i would like to way that i really admire the work that editors from this site give themslef to deliver us quality, trust worthy reviews.


But i was surprised when today cheking again the pentax k20d review and its build quality had the score of 17, wich is pretty low whn compared with cameras like sony a200 and the canon rebels that had the same rating...

maybe im misconcepting the term "build quality" but for me is the quality of the camera body, its durability, argonomics, thoughness and resistence.

But i must be wrong because its compared to the one of the Sony Alphas wich are plastic cheap and the rebels, wich are pretty smal, way to light and plastic aswell...(olympus in the other hand has a small but good tough body)

In the other hand the pentax bodys, wich are weather proof, really tough, confortable in the hand, you could throw it against a wall... worthy of a pro model...

i wish someone could explain it to me

=)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:57 pm 
The answer is simple. All the scores are relative, as stated by Gordon in the reviews. The K20d is compared against mid-range cameras, not the entry-level ones you listed.

Hope that clears things up. 8)

Mark


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:04 pm 
so, your saying that the cameras get rated depending on the class and not overall?

So when a entry level has 18 in IQ, means that its IQ is less than a mid range camera rated 17?

i tend to put everything in the same bag, no matter which class it belongs


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:42 pm 
I don't want to speak for Gordon, nor do I know the ins-and-outs of his testing but that is what he has explained in the past. I'll let him give you a more accurate answer.

Mark


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Hi MiGue£, Mark's right.

When you read the scores, check what it is 'compared' or 'relative' to - and also check the year, as it may be relative to 2008 or 2007 models and so on.

Ultimately these numbers are just there as a brief indicator - please read the entire review, especially the verdict page to get the whole story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:33 pm 
ok, thank you for the clearing =)

Good work


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:37 pm 
I have one question & I don't want to start a new topic just for it.
In the K10D verdict page,the image quality is 15/20 compared to mid-range models. I know the Pentax makes lower quality jpegs than most cameras,but is the score refering to the quality of RAW files as well?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
These scores take a lot of factors into consideration. The K10D was penalised for its default JPEG processing and the camera's habit of underexposing.

Again, please don't put too much weight on the scores though - they're just a brief snapshot. Read the whole review and check out the sample images and results pages for the whole story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:20 pm 
Thank you Gordon!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:00 pm 
might be deviating away from the main topic, but i have found the image stabilization quite useful during a recent trip to the smithsonian museum. all pictures taken handheld. i'm not sure how many stops advantage that is , but they came out good for someone who has shaky hands.

taken 1/20 f/5.6 50mm
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/2741419845_5e6bc61063.jpg?v=0

taken 1/8 f/5.6 50mm
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3231/2741420411_039204397a.jpg?v=0

taken 1/4 f/5.6 38mm
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3069/2741420249_2bfe475429.jpg?v=0

and for rei_vilo
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3281/2741420755_ed4bce5e31.jpg?v=0

help appreciated also, i tried to link the images directly using [img]link[/img] but it did't work for me. thanks in advance.

alfredo


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:06 pm 
Is this what you wanted?

taken 1/20 f/5.6 50mm
Image

taken 1/8 f/5.6 50mm
Image

taken 1/4 f/5.6 38mm
Image

and for rei_vilo
Image


Ben
_________________
When in doubt..... Press the shutter.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:10 pm 
exactly. mind going through the steps with me? might be helpful for anyone else trying to get the hang of this.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:24 pm 
You're not the only one having trouble.

Check out these threads. Some nice piccies too. :)

http://www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7088

http://www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7283

http://www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7032

Ben
_________________
When in doubt..... Press the shutter.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group