Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:09 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: My first cropped moon
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:35 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
You can call me dumb, but I just couldn't find a way to shoot the moon. It always appear overexposed, no matter the speed or aperture my lens had, it always came overexposed.

Then, few days ago and by mistake, I underexposed one shot to the moon and voila!

Damn I'm dumb... :oops:

Image

_________________

Carlos - Caracas Venezuela
EOS 40D
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD/50mm f1.8II

my flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:09 pm
Posts: 96
what lens did you use? did you enlarge the moon digitally?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:35 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
I used the 80-200mm @ 200mm f5.6 ISO 100 Speed: 1/20

This is 100% crop of the original photo.

Cheers

_________________

Carlos - Caracas Venezuela
EOS 40D
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD/50mm f1.8II

my flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 599
Location: Netherlands
Nice!

_________________
flickr
Canon 5D + 17-40 F4L + 50 F1.4 + 70-200 F2.8L
Velbon Sherpa 200R


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:09 pm
Posts: 96
Great deal for a 200mm :) great shot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:24 pm
Posts: 179
Location: Beavercreek Ohio, USA
Nice shot

_________________
Canon XTi
Canon EF 50mm
Canon EFS 18-55mm
Canon EF 75-300
Canon Speedlite 430EX Flash
Manfrotto 190XPROB Tripod
Manfrotto 804RC2 Head


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:35 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Thanks all...

Considering it was an accident it turned out to be a decent shot.

Could anyone with a 300mm+ lens please tell me if you can see real improvement in IQ and size when shooting the moon?

Maybe a 70-300mm will work better for this kind of photo?

I don't want to get into astrophotography, but from time to time I want to take photos of the moon with decent quality and size.

Cheers

_________________

Carlos - Caracas Venezuela
EOS 40D
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD/50mm f1.8II

my flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:46 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9952
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Camut, you'd be surprised how bright the Moon is. You could probably have used 1/60 for that shot at 100 ISO f5.6...

As for the lens, the 300mm will give you a Moon that's 50% bigger.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:16 am
Posts: 165
Location: South Africa
very nice shot Camut!

_________________
Canon EOS 400D, Canon EOS 30V, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, Speedlite 430EX, Kenko & Cokin filters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:35 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Gordon Laing wrote:
Camut, you'd be surprised how bright the Moon is.


Gordon, you bet I know now. I shot 40 or 50 photos before this one. One thing that intrigues me a lot is why the camera can't make the right readings on exposure by itself.

Can someone explain this?

Cheers

_________________

Carlos - Caracas Venezuela
EOS 40D
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD/50mm f1.8II

my flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:01 am
Posts: 41
Location: Bulgaria
Camut wrote:
Gordon Laing wrote:
Camut, you'd be surprised how bright the Moon is.


Gordon, you bet I know now. I shot 40 or 50 photos before this one. One thing that intrigues me a lot is why the camera can't make the right readings on exposure by itself.

Can someone explain this?

Cheers


Because the camera isn't as smart as we are :D
Here is a picture taken with my compact at fully manual settings

Image


shutter : 1/400
aperture : f5.6
focal lenght : 60mm
ISO : 100
Exposure bias : 0/3 EV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:30 am
Posts: 2370
Location: Malmö, Sweden
The moon looks really niec in Venezuela eh amigo!

Nice moon shots guys! I have to give this a goo when there there are no clouds in the sky, i heard ur supposed to focus to "infinity" call me stupid but is that clockwise on the lens or counterclockwise :P

Cheers

_________________
My Picasa

My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:35 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
alex168 wrote:
The moon looks really niec in Venezuela eh amigo!


Yeap... The moon looks great in our "hot" season (+/- summer) You can shoot wonderful sunsets and you have almost perfect lighting conditions most of the year. If you want to come here sometime in a photography tour you're most invited :)

For the moon, just remember to underexpose. That was how I got it.

Cheers

_________________

Carlos - Caracas Venezuela
EOS 40D
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD/50mm f1.8II

my flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:30 am
Posts: 2370
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Nice thanks for the invite, might drop in on way to Brazil to visit the family there.

Underexopse (check) what about Focusing?

_________________
My Picasa

My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:35 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
alex168 wrote:
Underexopse (check) what about Focusing?


With my old crappy 80-200mm is better to receive some auto focus help, but I tried manual and the results were acceptable.

A good lens is a must. As Gordon said, better with a 300mm. Remember using f8 or higher to avoid softness. Lenses tend to get better at those f stops.

Cheers :)

_________________

Carlos - Caracas Venezuela
EOS 40D
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD/50mm f1.8II

my flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group