Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:14 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: D5300 vs D7100?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 2
I am looking to buy my first serious DSLR - I currently have an ageing Konica Minolta A200 - and have been considering the D7100. However, today's review of the D5300 has me wondering why I would pay so much more for the D7100.

This may seem like a naive question, but what are the superior qualities of the D7100 over the D5300?

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D5300 vs D7100?
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 877
Location: SE Texas
Welcome to the forum! :)

Are you asking someone to compare specifications for you? I am typing one-handed today, and using very weak wi-fi signal, so I am not going to do your searching for you. :wink:

If I recall correctly, the sensors are the same, or nearly so. If that is your only concern, there is little reason to spend more money.

The D7100 has a focusing motor, so it can be used with lenses, such as the AF-D lenses, that do not have their own focusing motors. Some of Nikon's finest lenses are AF-D, and do not have AF-S counterparts, such as my 180mm 2.8D and 16mm 2.8D. I do not think the D5300 has a focusing motor, so if auto-focus is desired, one must use AF-S lenses, which have in-lens motors.

Will the D5300 meter light with AI and AI-S lenses? Weak wi-fi means I cannot easily verify this for you today. I believe the D7100 can meter with AI-S lenses, as can its D7000 predecessor.

Does the D5300 have the two arrows inside the viewfinder, that help the shooter manually focus? I doubt the D5300 has this feature, whereas the D7000 does, so it is likely that the D7100 does, too. This is a "pro" feature, that was formerly found only in the top-tier professional bodies, first making its way into the semi-pro bodies in the D7000. Consumer cameras tend to just have a green dot to indicate focus, which is less precise than the arrows plus the dot. Some really fine lenses, such as the excellent new Zeiss Otus, are manual-focus-only, and some shooting is best done with manual focus, even with AF lenses.

Does the D7100 have more frames-per-second? That is important for some folks, who shoot active subjects, such as sports, birds, and wildlife.

The D7100 may well have a more substantial grip than the D5300. I shoot often in low light, and much of the time will have an LED or Speedlight in my left hand, so I like a camera with a substantial grip, to help me hold it without having to bend my thumb. Most consumer DSLRs have skimpier gripping areas. I handled a demonstrator D7100, and found it has a quite nice grip, better for my hands than the D7000 or D600.

I mostly researched the D7100 because I thought my wife might want to upgrade from her D7000, but she has indicated she is still content. It is possibe I will buy a D7100 so we can share batteries, chargers, Speedlights, and accessories while traveling, but I am more inclined toward a D800E, if I can afford one, some time next year.

OK, I will submit this when I can get a stronger wi-fi signal. When I started typing, no other member had yet replied.

_________________
Canon 7D/5D/40D/1D2N; Nikon F6, D700, FM3A, & Coolpix A; Canon 40mm 2.8 STM, 135L, 50L, 35L, 50mm 1.8 I, 100mm 2.8L Macro, 10-22mm EF-S, 28-135 EF, 400mm 5.6L; Nikkor 50mm 1.2 AI-S, 50mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.8D, 16mm 2.8D Fisheye, 180mm 2.8D, 100-300mm 5.6 AI-S, 18mm 2.8D, Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL II


Last edited by RexGig on Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D5300 vs D7100?
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 2
Many thanks for such a considered reply. No, I'm not expecting anyone to compare specs for me - in fact, in other fields, I'm usually the one who is quoting specs at people :wink: .

But specs in themselves don't really mean anything until you are very familiar with what difference they make in practice, in the field. I know quite a bit about photography but in technology terms the world has moved on quite a bit since I got my A200 and it is difficult to judge how much difference particular specifications make to both making a really good photo and enjoying the experience.

You have highlighted some aspects which would not have been clear to me at all from studying the specs alone and I very much appreciate that. I know that the only way to truly understand the differences is to get hands on in a shop but I hate being in that pressurised environment where objective advice is hard to come by (and especially as I am also considering the Pentax K-3).

Thanks again for the suggestions about areas to look at in more depth.

Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group