Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:11 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:39 pm
Posts: 2
Not sure if this has been asked before but curious to know the difference in perspective, ie do they capture the same scene or is one more cropped or distorted than the other? Perhaps comparing them at both wide open for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:01 am
Posts: 1167
Location: bit east of Melbourne
both should be pretty similar, what camera gear do you already have.
The 5D III and the 2.8 will give you much better low light ability , but that may not be necessary.

Do you take indoor or outdoor photos, if low light ability for indoors is a concern, the 6D and the 17-40 is going to produce similar results to the 5D III and 16-40 at a much lower price.

_________________
Canon Powershot S95, Canon 6D,7D, Canon 40 2.8 STM, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Canon 17-40 L, Canon 15-85, Canon 85 1.8, Sigma 30 1.4, 50mm 1.8, Canon 100 2.8L Macro, Canon 70-300L +Kenko 1.4 Pro 300DGX, Canon 430EX II and RS 4 Classic


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group