Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:27 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Leica X Vario
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:27 am
Posts: 528
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Leica have announced their new 16MP APS-C fixed lens zoom 18-46mm f/3.5-6.4 camera

http://us.leica-camera.com/photography/compact_cameras/x_vario/


Quote:
The wide-angle to telephoto zoom range of the Leica X Vario offers great scope for creative composition, whether used for capturing indoor scenes, sweeping landscapes or intimate portraits.


I don't see how this lens is especially useful for any of these needs. Creative composition will be limited by such a slow lens, and shooting indoors at f/3.5 isn't ideal. An EFL 28mm isn't going to produce particularly "sweeping" landscapes. You can pretty much forget about shooting "intimate" portraits using f/6.4 either as much of the background is likely to be in reasonably distracting focus.

The camera will no doubt have Leica build quality and handling with the usual traditional manual controls, and I'm sure the lens will be of excellent quality despite its very mediocre specs, but I can't really see anything here to tempt anyone whatsoever (except the red dot).

Leica's M-series, coupled with one of those great lenses, still has something unique and unparalleled to offer the serious photographer despite the enormous price. However, even if the rumored price of the X Vario (north of $3000... without the optional viewfinder :shock: ) were reduced by half, offerings other manufacturers (especially Fuji) just blow it out of the water.

I don't want to be over-critical of a new untested camera, but can anyone help me out here?

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/53061745@N02/

Panasonic G3: 9-18mm, 14mm, 20mm, 45mm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leica X Vario
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:15 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:30 pm
Posts: 6953
Location: The Netherlands, Ridderkerk
I think it's a pretty silly attempt, the lens in particular. While I like the concept of a camera like this, and would have to say that most features seem perfectly acceptable, the lens just isn't. In terms of range, it lacks a bit at the wide end, as you say. Even 16mm (24mm equivalent) would have been better. The speed of the lens is where the main problem lies. I remember reading rumors a while back that said it would be f/3.5-6.4 and I thought that couldn't be true, surely Leica would do better than that. Turns out they didn't. The reason why, I think, it to keep the optical performance as high as possible: the clever lens designers at Leica might be able to make a faster lens, but it just wouldn't live up to Leica standards. Still, as is, the camera is pretty useless in anything but broad daylight...

- Bjorn

_________________
Street and documentary photographer | Google+ | Twitter

Leica M9-P (my article on Camera Labs) | Leica D-Lux 5 | 50mm Summilux


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leica X Vario
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:49 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:30 pm
Posts: 6953
Location: The Netherlands, Ridderkerk
It's funny how Leica's latest YouTube video, featuring the X Vario, is about a photographer who did a series on "Mistakes".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-HZpDX--g0

- Bjorn

_________________
Street and documentary photographer | Google+ | Twitter

Leica M9-P (my article on Camera Labs) | Leica D-Lux 5 | 50mm Summilux


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leica X Vario
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 9:13 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9822
Location: UK
.
¿Qué? At that price I'd rather have a Sony RX1. OK, the RX1 is a 35mm f/2 prime as opposed to the 28-70mm f/3.5-6.4 equivalent zoom of the X Vario (and that f/3.5-6.4 is a full-frame equivalent of about f/5.6-10 if you are comparing the ability to get shallow depth of field). The Sony actually does boast a full frame sensor sporting 24MP and is smaller, lighter and costs only a little bit more.

So, it's a win for Sony and a loss for Leica? Not necessarily as I don't think Leica expects customers for this camera to be looking for best value. Those customers will certainly want an extremely well engineered product, which I'm sure the X Vario is, but my guess is that they will also value the cachet of owning a Leica.

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leica X Vario
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:27 am
Posts: 528
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
The lens here has kit-lens specs, but I'm sure it's optically superior to your regular kit lenses, and likely of more value. With this in mind, I'd imagine the cost of gluing this to the Leica wouldn't be similar to attaching an equivalent 35mm or 50mm prime with at least f/2. So why didn't they?

I'm sure most Leica owners (or prospective owners) would be far more interested in something along the lines of a Leica equivalent to the Fuji X100. A $3000 Leica X Vario with a 23mm f/2.0 APS-C would attract even the attention of skinflint photographers such as myself (and perhaps herein lies their rationale :P ). None of the few Leica owners I know own zooms for their M-series, and the last thing I can picture in the hands of a Leica shooter is a slow zoom.

The mind boggles.

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/53061745@N02/

Panasonic G3: 9-18mm, 14mm, 20mm, 45mm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leica X Vario
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:50 am
Posts: 425
Location: Sydney Australia
Im so very deeply disappointed in this camera.

For the money you can get a Fuji Xpro1 and a few lenses and all the accessories you need - Probably get better IQ.

I was anticipating a poor mans M - EVERYONE was saying its a Mini M.... I was hoping for a Interchangeable camera system but was say, APS-C and smaller form factor than the M9 or something. Totally an overzealous P+S.

Isn't the Sony RX1 cheaper and can rival the M9's IQ? Surely when Leica said in its press release that they want the non-professional to buy their cameras, surely this isn't it right? Im one of those people - I used to video Weddings, then became a high school teacher, and stuck to Photography as a hobby and a side business, and $3000+ is far too much for a "non-professional" I may as well, save it for a 5D Mark III and use the Canon glass I already have.

Ok, sorry, just got deeply upset - I have this goal at the end of the rainbow and on the way, there are disappointing signposts.

_________________
1) Olympus OM1 [Zuiko Auto-S 50mm f/1.8]
2) Pentax MZ-60 [Sigma 28-90 & 100-300]
3) Canon 7D [EF-S 15-85 & 70-200mm f/4 IS & 50mm f1.4]
4) Leica M [50mm Summicron Pre-aspherical - Silver]

http://www.poetproductions.net


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group