Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:45 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:18 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:30 pm
Posts: 6953
Location: The Netherlands, Ridderkerk
Only have one (test) shot to show so far, since I don't own this lens just yet, but expect to see more photos in, say, two years (?). :)

Image

Have a look at the full resolution shot here:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4140/491 ... 711e_o.jpg

- Bjorn -

_________________
Street and documentary photographer | Google+ | Twitter

Leica M9-P (my article on Camera Labs) | Leica D-Lux 5 | 50mm Summilux


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 1822
That's the 50 to have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 7:29 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:30 pm
Posts: 6953
Location: The Netherlands, Ridderkerk
The 50mm is (and will remain for some time) the only lens I have for my Leica, but there are few better lenses to have. A 35mm Lux would probably serve me even better, but a fifty worked for HCB, and so it will do just fine for me.
I could post all the pictures I have shot with the lens in this thread, but I guess linking to some albums works better. Just click on the pictures below to go to the albums.


Paris:

Image



London:

Image



Berlin:

Image



Museum watching:

Image



Sets of series:

Image



Daily shots:

(many of these are taken with my Leica D-Lux 5, but there are quite a few M + 50 Lux shots too)
Image

- Bjorn

_________________
Street and documentary photographer | Google+ | Twitter

Leica M9-P (my article on Camera Labs) | Leica D-Lux 5 | 50mm Summilux


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2013 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 5:30 am
Posts: 111
Location: Kerala, India
Bjorn,I have this question in my mind for a quiet long time! dont take it as an offence

What extra would u able to get with ur new Leica as compared to to old DSLR other than that BIG BRAND NAME
As par as my understanding, their lenses are great but couldnt find any marginal difference in IQ!
Also its lacking lot more things including AF as compared to modern DSLR
Dont u think that the modern FF DSLR can resolve more details and produce better Dynamic range with faster AF and other advantages
Whats the point of moving from A DSLR to Far expensive Leica system?

May be i sound stupid, but i found that this forum is the best place to get the answers for those questions in my ind

_________________
CAMERAS:- Nikon D800 & Sony H50
LENSES:- Nikon AFS 50mm F1.8 G, Nikon AFS 24-70 F2.8 G, Sigma APO 70-200 F2.8 EX DG OS HSM
Wish list:- Nikon SB 700, Elinchrom FX 400


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2013 8:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 1822
Here's my initial input, although I have only briefly used a Leica that a friend owns. Bjorn will no doubt give you a far more balanced assessment!

In terms of image quality, Leica generally has superior optics to main brand DSLR manufacturers. Due to the lack of a mirror, the lens sits closer to the sensor itself which helps IQ - I'm sure Bjorn will go into far greater detail here...

Most DSLR lenses (there are a few exceptions) offer optimum performance once stopped down. Most of the Leica range perform very strongly wide open. The nearest I have in terms of performance is my Carl Zeiss 2/35 Distagon which is sharper at f2 than my 24-70mm f2.8 pro zoom at f4. Sure, there may be relative 'dogs' in the range, but as a whole the lenses are good performers wide open. That's before you get onto colour rendition, bokeh etc etc

AF is not the be all and end all! Far from it! With my manual focus Carl Zeiss, in certain circumstances, I can get a sharp in focus keeper far quicker than with an autofocus lens.

Hard stop at infinity - check
Distance scales for zone focusing - check

Form factor - the M9 is bigger in the flesh than you may think, but it is far more compact as a system and more discrete.

Shutter speeds - without a mirror clacking about, with smaller lenses and less weight, you can get away with slower shutter speeds hand held

Viewfinder - depending on lens, you can see subjects before they enter the actual shot. In some ways and circumstances, very useful

In many ways the M9 and M9-P may seem outdated when comparing specs, but rangefinder shooting is a completely different experience. I for one will be very interested to hear Bjorn's summary on the M9-P versus the new M and his reasons for disliking the latest Leica offering. There are many features on the M9 range that seem antiquated which for the money I feel should have been updated (LCD resolution being one, for example).

So if you get caught up in the marketing advances (who realistically, as an amateur, NEEDS 36MP, if they only occasionally print at 6x4"?) then the M may seem behind the times and antiquated. However, as a shooting experience I fell in love with it!

Patek Phillipe versus Timex. They both do the job, vary considerably in cost, many buyers of the slightly ( :) ) more expensive Pateks just buy to collect but many more to wear and appreciate for many years to come...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group