Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:36 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Hi everyone, Sony has announced the first compact camera with a fixed lens and full-frame sensor!

See my Sony RX1 preview for more details.

I'll expand this into a more detailed report as soon as I can! There's a lot going on right now...

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 10:34 pm
Posts: 1417
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Looks like a really interesting camera, I'll be looking forward for more info on this camera :)

_________________
Gear: Canon SX20 IS, Canon Rebel T3i, Canon EF-S 18-55mm, Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Wishlist: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L
Visit me and leave me a comment in My Flickr :)


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 887
Location: SE Texas
Conceptually, I am quite interested. This does not necessarily mean I would purchase an RX1, if I had the money. I will need to learn more about it, and read user reviews, plus, of course, handle the camera itself. The manual controls are a positive, as I do not really like menus and touch-screens. I do not anticipate being able to afford such a purchase until 2014, or later, so there is plenty of time to read, learn, and see what other manufacturers might announce.

The EVF, which is an accessory, is quite expensive! I would have to really love the concept to pay the price of a Canon 5D Mark III for an RX1 and EVF!

_________________
Canon 7D/5D/40D/1D2N; Nikon F6, D700, FM3A, & Coolpix A; Canon 40mm 2.8 STM, 135L, 50L, 35L, 50mm 1.8 I, 100mm 2.8L Macro, 10-22mm EF-S, 28-135 EF, 400mm 5.6L; Nikkor 50mm 1.2 AI-S, 50mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.8D, 16mm 2.8D Fisheye, 180mm 2.8D, 100-300mm 5.6 AI-S, 18mm 2.8D, Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 10:34 pm
Posts: 1417
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
I agree, personally, I'd never buy this camera, but it looks quite interesting and I might borrow it to test it out, have a field day with it :)
By the way, I'd never pay the same price that a Canon 5D MKIII costs just to get this camera, I think the price is quite high.

_________________
Gear: Canon SX20 IS, Canon Rebel T3i, Canon EF-S 18-55mm, Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Wishlist: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L
Visit me and leave me a comment in My Flickr :)


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:57 pm
Posts: 27
I just don't see anyone buying one of these over, say, an XE-1.

The conspicuous Zeiss branding on the lens, along with the orange ring — surely the latter is like those blue stickers point-and-shoots are festooned with, only engraved on the freaking camera — indicate a camera specifically targeted at poseurs.

But if they're after poseurs, it's poseurs who wouldn't prefer to spend less money on a fixed lens Leica (say for technical IQ reasons) but won't pick a cheaper Fujifilm system for technical IQ reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 887
Location: SE Texas
I just carefully read the preview at dpreview.com, and looked at product images several places, and I can certainly say that my interest in trying an RX1 is increasing. My Canon 5D has taught me to appreciate full frame, and f/2 is certainly fast enough for much of my shooting; I tend to stop my 1.2, 1.4, and 1.8 lenses down to 2.0 to 2.8 in low light, unless I absolutely need a wider aperture. While there is only one possible focal length, it is a very useful focal length.

The RX1, or a potential derivative model, might finally extinguish my desire to eventually acquire a Leica digital rangefinder, though this is largely dependent upon what Leica and other manufacturers might announce in the next couple of years.

I certainly do not consider a Sony to be a poseur's camera, at least not in my circle of photographer acquaintances, where Sony tends to be the butt of jokes.

The cost, compared to a 5D Mark III, which I mentioned earlier, does not seem quite so excessive, upon further reflection, considering the sensor and the lens. A Zeiss 35mm 2.0 lens, in Canon mount,
plus a 5D Mark II or III, would be quite a sum of money.

The negatives, from my point of view, are:

(1) One must choose between the accessory thumb rest, or the external EVF. This is a quite small camera body, and may be too small to balance the lens. Of course, there are generic external grip options that can thread into the tripod mounting hole, and in the future, there may well be grip or thumb rest options tailored to the RX1. I consider the EVF to be very important.

(2) When I spend this much money, to get a full-frame digital camera, I would like a second memory card slot, as with the current Nikon and Canon full-frame DSLRs. That may be, however, asking too much from such a tiny body, and in reality, I have yet to lose images due to a corrupted card.

(3) I prefer mechanical control of aperture and focus. The RX1 lens appears to be fly-by-wire. This is not, however, a deal-breaker, just a preference.

Moreover, the 5D3 seems to perform very well in low light, which is a major priority for me. (See the image of the cat that Jiko posted in the official 5D3 thread!) The RX1 is competing with it for available funds, and its low-light abilities are as yet unknown.

_________________
Canon 7D/5D/40D/1D2N; Nikon F6, D700, FM3A, & Coolpix A; Canon 40mm 2.8 STM, 135L, 50L, 35L, 50mm 1.8 I, 100mm 2.8L Macro, 10-22mm EF-S, 28-135 EF, 400mm 5.6L; Nikkor 50mm 1.2 AI-S, 50mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.8D, 16mm 2.8D Fisheye, 180mm 2.8D, 100-300mm 5.6 AI-S, 18mm 2.8D, Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 10:34 pm
Posts: 1417
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Well personally I think that if you can afford it, it wouldn't be such a crazy price, but if you're on a budget (like me) it's outrageous to pay so much for a camera that isn't really that much. I'd like to try it out but still I think it's just too expensive, that's just my point of view.

_________________
Gear: Canon SX20 IS, Canon Rebel T3i, Canon EF-S 18-55mm, Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Wishlist: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L
Visit me and leave me a comment in My Flickr :)


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:16 am 
If I have to buy new it must be better than my current Sony Nex-7. Unfortunately I have not enough money for Sony RX1, but if I had, I might buy it. Have seen some test photos and they look just fantastic, better than Sony A99 test photo :lol:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 1:15 pm
Posts: 3
Hi..
As I like to read about the latest and different cameras. As Sony Cyber-shot RX1 is world’s first fixed lens 35mm full frame digital camera that apparently produces stunningly detailed images and records Full High-Definition videos.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group