Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:19 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 1:48 pm 
would anyone be able to recommend a fixed 300mm lens for an OMD or EP2?
thanks
Antony


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9822
Location: UK
Hi Anthony,

May I wish you a warm welcome to the CameraLabs forum. As a recent convert to m4/3rds I'm not really best placed to offer an answer but here goes...

With no native 300mm m4/3rds prime I'm assuming that manual focus is the order of the day and that opens up a whole world of legacy glass provided you can source a suitable adaptor. But, as I've already discovered, trying to sort the wheat from the chaff can be a problem as most such glass often doesn't benefit from Internet reviews. For example, the LCE currently has an Olympus ZUIKO 300mm OM 1:4.5 for sale for £190. The lens may be marked as in "Good Condition" but was it ever optically good enough for today's digital sensors?

Hugely cheaper than the f/2.8 alternatives so it might be worth a punt if you can find out any more about it?

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 2:23 pm
Posts: 33
I can't vouch for m4/3 but I've used a Contax Carl Zeiss Tele-Tessar T* 300mm F4.0 via an adapter on my E-3 with some excellent results.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 2:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 27
Location: Australia
Bob Andersson wrote:
...LCE currently has an Olympus ZUIKO 300mm OM 1:4.5 for sale for £190. The lens may be marked as in "Good Condition" but was it ever optically good enough for today's digital sensors?


Of course it is but get the MC version in preference to the original.

Here's an interesting test:

http://www.bytesmiths.com/OM_Tele/

_________________
Image

EOS 7D + grip, EOS 40D + grip, EOS 10D + grip
EF-S 10-22mm f:3.5-4.5, EF 17-40mm f:4L, EF-S 60mm f:2.8 Macro, EF 70-200mm f:2.8L IS, EF 300mm f:2.8L, EF 500mm f:4L IS, EF 1.4x Converter II
2x Speedlite 550EX
Manfrotto 190XPROB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9822
Location: UK
Hi JD,

I see that this is your first post in a couple of years so welcome back.

Nice link but I've also noticed that the thread is two years old and that the OP's account has been deleted! :roll:

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 27
Location: Australia
Hi Bob,

Yeah, I noticed that but I just posted it because with the rise of M.4/3 and the lack of long glass, some of these old lenses might start reappearing on newer cameras. People might just be looking at some of these old Zuikos on places like eBay and start wondering whether they were worth having. Most good examples seem to go for around US $250-300 and while they are not of the optical quality of say a Canon FD 300 f/2.8, they aren't nearly as expensive.

I am fortunate in that I never sold my Olympus gear, even though I wanted to but never got around to it. I have seven primes between 16mm and 300, all Zuikos. I have to confess the 300 was a bit of a favourite and one of the things I liked about it was its resolution. I remember projecting a Kodachrome 64 slide from my enlarger* onto a wall about 2.5 metres away and being floored by the detail in the picture. Mine was the multi-coated version.

* It was fitted with a Schneider Kreutznach Componon S enlarger lens, which was frankly the best lens of any variety I have ever used and I have worked professionally for 30 years.

_________________
Image

EOS 7D + grip, EOS 40D + grip, EOS 10D + grip
EF-S 10-22mm f:3.5-4.5, EF 17-40mm f:4L, EF-S 60mm f:2.8 Macro, EF 70-200mm f:2.8L IS, EF 300mm f:2.8L, EF 500mm f:4L IS, EF 1.4x Converter II
2x Speedlite 550EX
Manfrotto 190XPROB


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group