Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:35 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi Thomas,

I think RAW comparisons have a place in reviews as well as the standard JPEG shots. Some of us will be content with out of the camera JPEGs while others shoot exclusively in RAW. But weren't those sharpening settings something you developed?

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
Bob Andersson wrote:
Hi folks,

Gordon has done an interesting "Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic GX1 / G3 noise (RAW)" comparison which you can read here.

The E-M5 wins and it seems quite clear that it doesn't use a version of the GX1 sensor.

Bob.


A very interesting comparison thanks. I have found that with the M5 the noise at high ISOs using RAW is lower than my Olympus PM1 with the 12MP sensor. I'd say by at least 1EV.

_________________
Frank


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:35 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi folks,

Since acquiring my E-M5 I've not been keeping up with the latest reviews (why would I? :lol: ) but I thought I'd share this one by Ming Thein since it sums up my own feelings about the camera pretty much exactly and has a great selection of much better photos than I could produce to go with it.

The only points I'd take issue with, and this is real nit-picking, is that we now know (thanks, Gordon) that the E-M5 sensor isn't the same as that in the GX1 and there is now a second weather resistant lens to take advantage of the E-M5's own weather resistance, namely the Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm/F2.8 ASPH.

    Image

Boy, but that looks pretty even if there is no point in leaving the Power OIS switch set to On with the OM-D E-M5 body. :P

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8022
Location: UK
I haven't paid attention on one detail: does the body IS work during composition or only during exposure?

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:54 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi popo,

There's an interesting interaction, at least on my LEICA D VARIO-ELMAR 14-150mm/ F3.5-5.6 ASPH./ MEGA O.I.S. (oh, how I miss Canon's simple but effective naming!!!). I haven't tested all the combinations but I normally have my E-M5 set up so that IBIS kicks in on a half press of the shutter button. In that mode if I set the lens IS to On the stabilisation kicks in full time until I half press the shutter button at which point stabilisation appears to turn off completely (body and lens) if the view through the viewfinder is any guide. Whether IBIS reasserts when the shutter button is fully pressed isn't something I've tested as it just doesn't make sense to try and operate the camera like this so far as I'm concerned.

If I turn of the body's IBIS and turn on the lens based IS then image stabilisation works full time. Not having access to a LUMIX G VARIO 100-300mm / F4.0-5.6 / MEGA O.I.S I've no way of knowing but it occurs to me that lens based IS might be more effective and/or sensor-friendly when zoomed in to 300mm (600mm FF equivalent FoV) as in body image stabilisation would have to move the sensor around pretty violently. But on the new Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm/F2.8 ASPH the five axis IBIS of the E-M5 is surely the way to go...

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8022
Location: UK
So the body IS can work for composition then? Thinking back to the old days (like my E-P1) when they didn't do that, it only kicked in during exposure itself. That was a disadvantage of body IS vs lens at the time. I guess the body vs lens debate continues particularly with longer focal lengths, but you got the best of both worlds there!

Not that I have any intention of re-joining mirrorless in the short term, it still pays to keep up with developments.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi folks,

The HLD-6 grip (free promotional offer for those of us who bought early) arrived this morning. As I expected I'm unlikely to use the portrait section but with that removed the grip adds very little height to the camera and certainly makes the camera a lot more secure to hold when a heavy lens is attached. As on the camera body there's a command wheel surrounding the shutter button on the grip and the ergonomics work well for me.

    Image

Shown above fitted with my "super-zoom" 14-150mm four-thirds "Leica" the gap between the grip and the lens body is tight but it's still possible (just) to fit my fairly large fingers in there without the middle finger rubbing against the lens and the extra security is worth that needed extra little bit of care. That gap isn't an issue at all when I'm using my regular m4/3 lenses and even when the Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm is fitted the lens still protrudes further forward than the grip when the camera is switched off. As a result I'm going to leave the grip, sans portrait attachment, permanently in place for now but if the minimal extra bulk becomes irksome then I'll reserve the grip for use with heavier glass.

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
I was recently trying the E-M5 with the two grip options and like Bob, i was quite fond of the halfway solution which increases the depth and height of the grip, while also centering the tripod thread underneath.

Ken and I have almost finished our full review of the E-M5! Watch this space!

PS - does anyone have any anecdotal evidence on the environmental sealing of the E-M5? Don't forget the weather-sealing thread in the off-topic section too!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:35 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
.
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 review is now up. Hey, I even got to watch the master reviewer (Gordon) work his magic comparing my E-M5 and the GX1 noise levels (here). 8)

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
A pleasure working with you Bob!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:28 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi folks,

Gordon was right on the money when he discovered that the E-M5 sensor isn't made by Panasonic. It seems (source) that Sony makes it, 8)

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:37 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi folks,

Two pieces of E-M5 news today:

  1. OM-D E-M5 Version 1.2 Firmware
    .
    Improved sleep recovery operation.
    AF target is indicated when using C-AF+TR while shooting sequential images using Sequential L setting. - Added function to automatically move focus to the following zoom positions when underwater macro mode or underwater wide mode is selected. (Only when M. ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-50 mm F3.5-6.3 EZ is attached)
      Underwater wide mode: Wide setting
      Underwater macro mode: Telephoto setting
    .
  2. DxO Optics Pro v7.5.2: support for the Olympus OM-D EM-5, and 300 new DxO Optics Modules
    .
    DxO Optics Pro 7 now supports the latest high-end micro 4/3 camera from Olympus, the OM-D EM-5, along with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5. More than 300 new camera/lens combinations have been added since the previous version.

The camera firmware update is available via Olympus Viewer 2 - great system if, unlike me, you regularly use that software.

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:51 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi folks,

Olympus have now released OM-D E-M5 firmware 1.5.

I updated from v1.2 using Olympus Viewer 2 as usual and the first upgrade only got me as far as v1.4. A further pass through the upgrade process got me up to v1.5. As you can see from the list below (source) the upgrade is worthwhile.

    Ver.1.5 (Oct. 2, 2012)

  • Operating sounds in the photo ready mode were decreased.
  • Use of the Image stabilizer function by setting the Focal length of an OM lens attached with an adapter was enabled even in Movie mode.
  • All updates up to version 1.2 are included.

    Ver.1.4 (Oct. 2, 2012)
  • Update functions for firmware version 1.2 have been modified. Camera functions are the same as version 1.2. After updating to ver. 1.4, please update the camera to ver. 1.5.

    Ver.1.3 (Oct. 2, 2012)
  • Update functions for firmware prior to version 1.1 have been modified. Camera functions are the same as version 1.1. After updating to ver. 1.3, please update the camera to ver. 1.5.

    Ver.1.2 (Jul. 12, 2012)
  • Improved sleep recovery operation.
  • AF target is indicated when using C-AF+TR while shooting sequential images using Sequential L.
  • Added function to automatically move zoom to the following zoom positions when underwater macro mode or underwater wide mode is selected.
  • (Only when M. ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-50 mm F3.5-6.3 EZ is attached)
    - Underwater wide mode: Wide setting
    - Underwater macro mode: Telephoto setting

    Ver.1.1 (Apr. 18, 2012)
  • Issue of updates stopping while updating firmware has been resolved.
  • Image stabilizer function when using the following lenses has been modified.
    - ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 8mm F3.5 Fisheye
    - ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 18-180mm F3.5-6.3
    - LEICA D VARIO-ELMAR 14-150mm

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:25 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9811
Location: UK
Hi folks,

It has been a long time coming but DxO have finally released their E-M5 tests. You can read the review here and compare the E-M5 measurements with other cameras here (I chose the Canon 60D).

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:18 am 
I am wondering in the review in ISO noise compare with NEX-7 was it taken into account the difference between actual ISO and stated Olympus ISO? Or was it just typical compare of Olympus ISO3200 to Sony ISO6400? :) I had both cameras and Sony was actually little better for me in proper test (with identical shutter speed and aperture).


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group