Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:35 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:37 pm
Posts: 17
Hi Gordon,

Happy New Year! I would like to ask for your expert advice as I am planning to get a "USED NIKON 35-70mm f/2.8D to compliment my current set up: Nikon D7000; Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 AF-ED and Nikkor 35mm 1.8g.

Would the 35-70 be wise to get? I feel a little handicapped in certain situations using the prime 35mm zooming wise.

Please advice. Much obliged.

Kind regards,

Jason


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:41 pm
Posts: 363
Depends what you shoot. Myself, I wouldn't feel limited by the gap between 35 and 80, particularly as the 35/1.8 is so good. And it is 1 1/3 stops brighter.

The setup still doesn't give you a wide angle view. You may not want one, and stitching is always possible.

Of course, the 35-70 has a good, bright aperture over a zooming range.

For my style of shooting, I like being able to go to 16 easily, but if you're happy with 35 and the lens is reasonably priced, it may be just what you need.

_________________
HCC
Nikon DSLRs, film cameras from Leica to Linhof


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:34 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7896
Location: Germany
Found this comment from nature photog Bjørn Rørslett:
"This bulky and impressively sharp 'normal' lens was released in the late 80's to attract the attention of photojournalists. It is a nice handling lens on an F4 or F5, although the rotating front end is a little annoying when a polariser is used. Barrel distortion and corner fall-off are kept at negligible levels. At f/5.6 to f/11 it delivers excellent images at all focal settings. It flares visibly under adverse light conditions but ghosting, although plainly visible, rarely is detrimental to image quality. There is a 'macro' setting for people wanting to get a little closer with a concomitant loss of sharpness, particularly in the corners. Reversing this lens to get high magnification yields mediocre quality so is not recommended."
But I'd go for something that is wider, like a AF 24-85mm 2.8-4.0D or even a AF-S VR DX 18-55mm 3.5-5.6G kit lens. It's much more versatile.

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group