Camera Labs

Hi,

I am quite new to photography and looking for an Interchangeable Lenses Camera (around £500). So any suggestion?

Personally, I am thinking between Lumix G3 and Sony Nex-5N. Which one do you guys think is better (in term of overall image quality)?

PS: The Lumix G3's default lense is made by Lumix instead of Leica right? Is there any difference in quality of picture delivered?

Are you sure image quality is the biggest factor to decide between them? They're both likely good enough for most applications.

In theory the Sony will have an advantage with the bigger sensor, but at the moment their lens range is very limited and hasn't been seen as that great in quality either. Also, bigger sensor often leads to bigger lenses.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.

I would have to agree with popo. It's your own choice but I'm not sure image quality is necessarily the best factor by which to choose between them. The Sony has the benefit of a larger sensor so the chances are that its low-light performance and noise management are better but as with most interchangeable lens cameras, the lens you use will show a more apparent difference in low-light performance than the sensor. Like popo said, the problem with Sony is the very limited range of lenses for the NEX series, though there is no shortage of lenses you can adapt though probably at the cost of losing your AF.

As you're quite new to photography it's probably worth bearing in mind that in light of how much you're looking to spend, it's really worth getting your hands on both cameras at a local CE/photography store. With (quite) closely matched cameras, what you take photos with is arguably less important that how often you use it - Camera A may have an arguably superior feature set to Camera B but if you find Camera A uncomfortable to hold or its menu awkward to navigate, you may not use it that often and perhaps even waste its potential.

I'm not saying you should bluntly disregard anybody's views of which is "better" but you should try both out and judge for yourself which is better FOR YOU - one size doesn't fit all.

_________________
Bodies: Canon EOS 550D w/ Magic Lantern
Lenses: Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX f/2.8, Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Accessories: YongNuo Speedlite YN-468 Flash, Neewer Macro LED Ring Light, Meike Battery Grip, YongNuo RF-602 Wireless Flash Trigger & Receiver YongNuo WR-128 Wireless Remote Control

Thanks a lot guys.

So the Lumix G3 and the Nex-5N are a close match?

But can you guys recommend me other ILC apart from those 2 that I have mentioned?

And is the lenses from the Lumix G3 made by Leica or Lumix itself?

They are loosely similar at best.

Neither camera is for me personally but if I had to choose, I'd most likely take the NEX5 but that is in no way a recommendation on my part.

Maybe if you say what you plan on using the camera (mostly), people can give better and more relevant advice.

_________________
Bodies: Canon EOS 550D w/ Magic Lantern
Lenses: Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX f/2.8, Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Accessories: YongNuo Speedlite YN-468 Flash, Neewer Macro LED Ring Light, Meike Battery Grip, YongNuo RF-602 Wireless Flash Trigger & Receiver YongNuo WR-128 Wireless Remote Control

I'd go for the G3 personally, I don't like the fact that although on the Sony you get the advantage of larger sensors, the lenses that you need to mount onto the body are huge, defeating the fact. If I were to choose another brand, I'd probably go for the Olympus E P3, mainly because of its selection of quality lenses (including many excellent primes), good image quality, fast AF and beautiful styling.

If you want something nice and small, you may want to consider the Pentax Q or Nikon J1 or V1, either one with a small pancake prime lens. The Pentax and Nikon both have smaller sensors (although their image quality is still very comparable), allowing them to be smaller than the other cameras. They may be a bit out of your budget, but you won't be disappointed with either one.

Regarding the "Leica" logo on the Panasonics, it's mainly marketing. I believe that the lenses do use Leica optics, but they're nowhere near the quality of those that you'd find on one of their M series rangefinder bodies. The quality of the Leica Lumix lenses for the Panasonics is very similar to those of other brands, they're not superior or inferior to them.

_________________
-Evan

Gear: 7 Nikon Nikkor AI-S and AF-S lenses, SB-700 flash, Nikon D7000, Nikon FM, variety of accessories

"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
- Ansel Adams

I have just noticed that the Lumix G3 is lenses based image stablisation instead of camera based. So if I use the lense with stablisation, will the result be different from using the camera's based stablisation feature?

Is not having this feature on the camera body a much problem?

Lens-based and sensor-based IS both have benefits and disadvantages over each other. These are some of the benefits/drawbacks in the context of DSLRs but I'm not sure how much is relevant to EVIL/MFT/CSC cameras

Lens-based
+ You see the stabilisation at viewfinder level so you can determine if the image appears to be still more easily
+ The IS doesn't work on a one-size fits all basis so each lens' IS is more finely tuned for that particular lens
- If you want the most up to date IS, you'll have to invest in new lenses
- Lenses with IS tend to command a much higher premium than bodies with IS build around the sensor

Sensor-based
+ You can use a 50-year-old lens and IS will still function
+ Only the body needs to be upgraded to stay in touch with improved IS technology
- In theory, the stabilisation won't be as precise as lens-based IS since the sensor-based IS is a general purpose system rather than the tailor-made system in IS lenses

In the real world, however, the differences most people will notice are far more apparent in the wallet than in the photos.

_________________
Bodies: Canon EOS 550D w/ Magic Lantern
Lenses: Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX f/2.8, Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Accessories: YongNuo Speedlite YN-468 Flash, Neewer Macro LED Ring Light, Meike Battery Grip, YongNuo RF-602 Wireless Flash Trigger & Receiver YongNuo WR-128 Wireless Remote Control

Remember though that concerning ILCs, the camera receives the feed for the electronic viewfinder directly from the sensor, so you'll be able to see the stabilization effect when composing (at least from my understanding of how sensor based IS systems work). Otherwise, I personally think that lens based systems are better. Most lenses made for mirrorless systems do have some sort of IS, and the ones that don't, generally pancake primes, are so wide and fast that they shouldn't need any sort of IS. On my DSLR however, I could definitely see the merits of a sensor based system, like the ability to use IS even with my old Nikon primes. However, regarding mirrorless systems, I definitely think that the advantages of a lens bases system outweigh the disadvantages.

_________________
-Evan

Gear: 7 Nikon Nikkor AI-S and AF-S lenses, SB-700 flash, Nikon D7000, Nikon FM, variety of accessories

"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
- Ansel Adams

So will it be possible to use both lens-based and sensor-based camera at the same time?

Theoretically yes it is possible but the more likely outcome is that the lens and sensor-based IS systems, when working simultaneously, will work independently from one another, both to each other's detriment. For example, the lens will stabilise the image but motion detected in the body will cause the sensor to move to compensate for the apparent motion of the image, which has already been stabilised by the lens, nullifying the stabilisation the lens had already achieved, resulting in the lens stabilising the image to compensate for the motion in the sensor. In short, putting the two systems together will create a vicious circle.

_________________
Bodies: Canon EOS 550D w/ Magic Lantern
Lenses: Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX f/2.8, Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Accessories: YongNuo Speedlite YN-468 Flash, Neewer Macro LED Ring Light, Meike Battery Grip, YongNuo RF-602 Wireless Flash Trigger & Receiver YongNuo WR-128 Wireless Remote Control

The Panasonic all the way,I could write a tone of comparissons between the 2,but a lot of points have already been mentioned above. The Panasonic also has better AF & more.

_________________
Gear: Nikon D80, 18-105mm, 35mm F/1.8, 85mm F/1.8, SB-600
Visit my work here