Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:15 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:42 am 
Hello everyone,

Could someone help me with the following question. I have tried the Canon Rebel T3i and I really like it. I am now trying the Nikon D5100 and I like it also. It stamps the picture which I like and it has many scenes that the Rebel does not have. But I find, I might be wrong though, that the Nikon's pictures are not as crsp and clean as the Rebel. I have been to different sites and I have seen examples of both which state the opposite of what I am saying but I find that the Nikon's shots are soft and not as crisp and clean as the Rebel. In your expert opinions, what's more important, crisp, clean shots or a camera that gives good shots but soft but stamps the date on the picture, and has a wide variety of different scenes? I would really appreciate some guidance on this.

Thanks again,


JPLD


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:57 am
Posts: 1551
Location: Winterpeg, Manisnowba, Canada
Having a sharp photo is MUCH (As in MUCH MUCH) more important than scene modes or date stamps, I never stamp photos or use scene modes, getting the sharpest images is the most important. However, generally getting a sharp photo relates to having a sharp lens, not the camera. In case you mean noise (graininess) the cameras are pretty similar.

_________________
-Evan

Gear: 7 Nikon Nikkor AI-S and AF-S lenses, SB-700 flash, Nikon D7000, Nikon FM, variety of accessories

"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
- Ansel Adams


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 7:56 pm 
+1

Using a DSLR as you would a P&S defeats the purpose of owning a DSLR, imho. ymmv.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:22 pm
Posts: 1315
Location: Speyer (Germany)
I don't like time stamps either. If I wanted to have those, I'd add them later. The EXIF data still tells when the shot was taken.

_________________
Canon EOS 500D + Canon EOS 5D Mark III + Canon EOS 33v
Canon EF 28-80mm 3.5-5.6 USM + EF 24-105mm 4L IS USM + EF 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS USM + EF 50mm 1.8 II + EF 100mm 2.8L Macro IS USM + Sigma 12-24mm 4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM + Canon Speedlite 580 EX II + Nissin Speedlite Di 466


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:23 pm
Posts: 827
Location: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Sharpness comes from many variables, and is rarely something attributed to the brand of camera. First, different manufacturers use different default settings - some like to add more sharpening to their JPGs, some leave them softer to be tuned up in post. All cameras have user customization for picture settings and can be adjusted to raise or lower the sharpening, so you can bring down the Canon or bring up the Nikon to basically deliver the same style. Shoot in RAW, and it's a non issue, as you process your own JPGs to suit your taste.

Sharpness is also an attribute of the lens used...some lenses are soft, some razor sharp. Some kit lenses are better than others.

Sharpness is an attribute of focus accuracy, and aperture setting. Are you comparing the exact same aperture, of the exact same subject, in the exact same lighting? If not, too many variables to say one is definitively sharper than another.

All of the manufacturers are so close as to be equals - Sony, Canon, Nikon, and Pentax are so close in performance across the board that the other variables - picture settings in the camera, photographer skill, quality of lens used, and post-processing capabilities - are what make the difference in the quality of the image.

_________________
Justin Miller
Sony DSLR-A580 / Sony 18-250mm / Minolta 50mm F1.7 / Sigma 30mm F1.4 / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 150-600mm / Tamron 90mm F2.8 macro / Minolta 300mm F4 APO
Sony A6000 / 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 / 55-210mm F4-6.3 / 10-18mm F4 / 35mm F1.8 / 16mm F2.8 / via manual adapter, lots of Pentax K mount, Konica K/AR mount, and Leica M mount manual lenses

Galleries:
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group