Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:24 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8042
Location: UK
An interesting alternative has recently appeared. Intel X25-V 40GB, roughly half of a X25-M 80GB G2 for about half the price. The interesting part is on average two of those in raid 0 is faster than the single 80GB. ref. Lost of TRIM in raid, but they suggest workaround of under-partitioning a bit to give more working space. Wonder if TRIM works in Windows software raid 0 as opposed to the chipset or hardware versions.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 298
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
I'm sure I read somewere that Intel has just released a new driver that enables TRIM in RAID modes other than RAID 5.

_________________
Image
Canon EOS 50D/EF-S 18-55mm IS/EF-S 55250mm IS/EF 50mm F1.8 II /Lowepro AW Slingshot 200/ Digital Ixus 860 IS

PC>Q6700/MSI P45 Zilent/6GB 800mhz DDR2/2x 4870 1GB/Samsung Spinpoint F1 500GB/Maxtor 200GB+80GB


My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8042
Location: UK
Having just upgraded my netbook from HD to SSD, the difference isn't as much as I hoped.

Noise: the silence is a little disconcerting. The click and hum of a hard disk is almost reassuring that a computer is on, leaving the job to the cooling fan. I'm sure I'll welcome this in the long term but for now I'm still in the getting used to it stage.

Power consumption: Might actually be slightly higher than the disk I took out. In a desktop scenario, it could show more improvement over 3.5 inch drives, but doesn't seem that different compared to 2.5 inch drives.

Capacity value: of course this is the biggest weakness for now. For HALF the cost of the 40 GB SSD, I could have got a 500GB model in the 2.5 inch form factor. Going up in physical size, 2TB in 3.5 inch format could be got for the same price as the SSD. You will not be picking a SSD for capacity!

Performance: While the benchmarks confirm it is performing as expected, in practical use I haven't felt it. Maybe the applications I'm using are light enough the disk was never a significant bottleneck after all.

Full details in this thread.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
Consider me an SSD adopter 2. I got the 80 GB Intel XM25-M Postville, and...it's amazing. I mainly bought it because virtualizing 5 servers on a 5400 RPM disk was sort of a mission impossible.

The performance is quite amazing. Applications launch almost instantly, nothing bottlenecks the HDD. Trying to open up firefox whilst doing a disk transfer? Nearly no slowdown for both. Want to open an app? It's pretty much instantaneous.

Oh, and battery life wen from reported 8 hours to 9 and a half. :lol:

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:22 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Like Citruspers above, I also went for the Intel X-25M G2 80 GB. I've had it for 3 days now, and I really like it. Lightroom got a lot faster when it comes to importing and rendering images. I haven't tried CS4 so much, but loading levels in my favorite games also got a lot faster. The computer as a whole feels more responsive, and programs never crash. I can only second the opinion of the sticker I received along with my new SSD: "My SSD rocks" .

_________________
Nikon D700
AF-S 28mm f/1.8G
AF-S 60mm f/2.8G
AF-S 85mm f/1.8G
2 x Speedlight SB-600
Yongnuo RF-603 and other accessories


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:32 am 
I got a first generation Kingston V-Series 64GB SSD in August 2009 and it's been quite nice most of the time. Perhaps it's not quite as fast as the Intel 80GB SSD, but for ordinary daily stuff, it's fast enough and Windows 7 Pro x64 starts within 30 seconds from it. It's not very fast for too many random operations - the 640GB WD Caviar Blue is a little better there, but for sequential stuff and the odd random operation (like starting some app from time to time) is quite quick.
I have two partitions on it, the first one is just for the OS and the other one is for apps that don't have to be installed (Apache, database servers - data are on the WD HDD, some portable apps). Games and documents are on the WD HDD. Games are too big for the SSD but it doesn't really matter - they loaded only a bit faster from the Kingston drive.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Hi everyone, I've just published an article discussing what's the smallest SSD you can get away with as a boot / application drive. I compared the OCZ Agility 2 60GB against the OC Vertex 2 120GB.

What's the smallest SSD you can get away with?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:27 am 
I'm loving the fact that SSDs are getting cheaper. Compact & much more reliable than Hard Drives,they will be the best option for my future computer. (a tech expert told me that 2 SSDs in RAID,coupled with a fast processor & enough DDRAM will be amazing for photo/video editing)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8042
Location: UK
Interesting thoughts on what is "big enough". I've been running a 40GB in a netbook for a while, but of course that doesn't have high software demands. Unfortunately I also found that the major bottleneck on that was the CPU not HD, so the performance difference from SSD was minimal compared to HD.

I debated getting one into the new laptop I have, where a 2nd hard disk is not usually an option. The price/capacity of SSD isn't quite there for me yet.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:54 pm
Posts: 22
Location: Singapore
I have an 80 Gb Intel SSD with 2 x 2Tb normal data drives. I have around 35Gb free on the SSD for the past year having installed numerous applications. Not felt restricted in any way. Posted previously about the benefits for me - couldnt go back now.

_________________
Nikon D600
Nikkor AF-S 18-35 f/3.5-4.5G, Nikkor AF-S 28-300 f/3.5-5.6G VR, Nikor AF-S 50 /1.8 G


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:03 am
Posts: 854
Location: Paris, London
I am currently looking to buy a new laptop. Having used SSD drives for some time, I consider having an SSD drive mandatory. The real-world performance increase to me is considerable. Not sure how reliable they are, having one die on me just a few weeks ago (I assume the controller is dead), as opposed to never having a primary old school HDD failure in the couple of decades I have been using them (lucky I know). So far I have owned 3 SSD drives, 1 failing. The worry I have now is that I bought 2 identical drives.......

I consider 256GB the minimum size, as I already have that in my current laptop. Pricey yes, but worth every penny? In my opinion and for my usage yes.

_________________
http://www.dpinparis.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:31 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9829
Location: UK
.
From this bit-tech article:
    Corsair announces Force 3 SSD recall

    Corsair only released the Force 3 range last month, so not too many users will have an affected SSD. Corsair has announced that it's recalling one model of its new Force 3 SSDs, due to stability issues.

    According to Corsair, only 120GB SSDs with the part number CSSD-F120GB3-BK are affected by the problems, which don't affect all Force 3 SSDs. However, if you own an SSD with the offending model number, Corsair recommends that you stop using it immediately, even if you haven't experienced any problems with it.

    Thankfully, Corsair has stopped shipping the drives and has a fix for the problem, but you'll need to physically return the SSD, as the fix requires changes to the SSD's hardware components, as well as a firmware update.
There's more info available at bit-tech.

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 244
Location: NB, Canada
When I built my current computer a bit over a year ago, I found SSD drives were too expensive. A 150gb model ran for around 750$, while 60gb ran for about 300-400$.

What I opted for instead was the hybrid Seagate 95005620AS to supplement my 2TB internal and 2TB external HDDs.

There isn't a lot of details about the internal specifications of it, but it combines both an SSD and an HDD for a total of 500GB. It moves around the data to the SSD portion based on what you use more often, and keeps the less-used files on the HDD portion of the drive.

I've had great results with the drive so far. The boot times and application load times are very good (not as good as a pure SSD, but much better than a pure HDD), yet I have enough storage space so I'm not worried about installing more applications, windows updates, etc. It's definitely an alternative worth looking into.

_________________
Cameras: Canon EOS 6D, Canon EOS Rebel T3i, Canon EOS Rebel T2i, Canon S90
Lenses: Tamron: SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD, SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di VC USD, Rokinon: 8mm Fisheye cine, Canon: EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens, 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III, and EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Retired camera: Fujifilm Finepix s700


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:07 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Taiwan / Sweden / Scotland
Im running a 128GB SSD OCZ Vertex 2E as my system drive ^^
The boot up is just lovely!


well Im planning on getting 1 more SSD but this time a Vertex 3E or Agility 3 SATAIII but still 128GB, the larger ones are too expensive!

_________________
http://www.AnderssonPhoto.com
Equipment: A blend of Canon, Nikon, Yashica, Leica, Voigtlander, Samyang and Sigma. All of which you can see on my website!
Wishlist: Leica M 240, Summilux 50 ASPH, Summilux 24 ASPH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:14 am
Posts: 154
Location: Sydney, Australia
I know I am not one of the regular posters here, and I am late to this thread.

There's one huge disadvantage seems no one seems to have mentioned (apart from the cost of SSD):
Data recovery on SSD is quite difficult, much more difficult than regular HDD. (This is from a technician of a data recovery company in Sydney. I unfortunately had to use the data recovery service once.)

_________________
AntBlog701 | SillyDog701
Apple: MacBook Air (11-in, 1.8GHz i7), Mac Pro (12-core 2.66GHz), MacBook Pro (15-in), iMac (21.5-in, Core i5), Mac mini Server (2.66GHz), iMac (24-in, C2D), PowerBook G4 (12-in, 1.33GHz), iMac G4 (1.25GHz)x2, PowerMac G4 (dual 1.44GHz).
iPhone: 5s, 5, 4S, 4, 3G
iPad: Air, Mini, 4, 3, 2, original (all models are 3G/LTE)
iPod touch: 5th gen x2, 4th gen x2 & 1st gen,
4 x AirPort Extreme, 2 x Time Capsule...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group