Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:47 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
I'm back from a 5 week holiday with my wife in Ireland. I have created a gallery at PBase. All photos were taken with my Sony HX5. If you are interested, here is the link.

http://www.pbase.com/frank_b/ireland_2010

Thanks to everyone who takes a look.

On my previous trips to Ireland I have used a DSLR. This is my first trip where I used only a compact camera. It was wonderful to always have my camera in my pocket.

The Camera Labs review of the Sony HX5 was very influential in my decision to purchase it.

_________________
Frank


Last edited by fgbrault on Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Hi Frank, care to share the highlights (and lowlights) of using the HX5, especially compared to your previous kit? Where it worked well, where it didn't, any tips etc?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
Will do Gordon.

_________________
Frank


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Sony HX5 Review
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
Gordon asked if I would do a review of the HX5. So here goes.

BACKGROUND

I purchased the HX5 (relying heavily on Gordon's review) to supplement my Panasonic LX3. Prior to getting my LX3 I was using an Olympus E3 SLR. A super camera, but just too heavy and bulky for me. I was missing a lot of photo opportunities because I did not have it with me. The LX3 is a fine compact camera with an excellent very fast lens, but its focal length at the long end is limited to 60mm. I wanted the HX5 for its 250mm focal length at the long end and for its 10fps. When I started using it I found that its picture quality was better than I expected, especially its dynamic range, and that it did well in low light for a compact. With its 25mm to 250mm focal length it was much more versatile than my LX3. As a result I switched to the HX5 for all my photography.

HX5

Picture Quality - First of all I think the overall picture quality is excellent (see my exceptions below). I was really surprised by its JPEGs dynamic range, even in normal modes like Program. I feel it is the best of any camera's JPEGs that I have owned and as good as RAW in some of my previous cameras. Sharpness is excellent except for some smearing of very fine detail, probably due to too zealous noise reduction. Also, there are sometimes halos, I think from the in-camera sharpening. I sharpen my pictures more in post processing and that is difficult to do without making the halos worse. I have all the resolution I need. I have only printed one photo (I expect to print more from my trip to Ireland) at 8x10 and am satisfied with it. Almost all of my photos are displayed on the internet and 10mp is more than enough resolution, even allowing me to crop.

I do not like the fact that Sony did not include in-camera ability to adjust picture parameters, such as sharpness, noise reduction contrast, etc.. Fortunately, I always post process and the base JPEG meets my needs, although I would like to be able to turn down sharpening and noise reduction. For anyone, considering the HX5 who does not do post processing it is important to satisfy yourself the the out of the camera images meet your needs. I would love it if in the next version there was a RAW option.

I think, that for a compact camera, the HX5 does well in low light. The Hand-held Twilight Mode can be useful in controlling noise. However, I have been very pleased with the results in Program Mode and Manual Mode. I sometimes use noise reduction in post-processing. I use the Topaz DeNoise 5 plug-in in Photoshop and like it very much.

Features - I am not a point and shoot photographer, so I typically do not use anything, but Program Mode or Manual Mode. One exception is Hand-held Twilight Mode (see above). Also, I occasionally use the iSweep Mode.

10 fps - A marvelous feature not found in very many cameras - DSLR or Compact - period. This is a great help with action shots in capturing the 'moment'. Also, I sometimes use it at slow shutter speeds and pick the sharpest result. Here is an example.

http://www.pbase.com/frank_b/image/129623799

Manual Mode - This is actually very limited, as it has only two apertures and the smaller aperture (f8 at 25mm) is obtained with a filter, so there is no difference in depth of field ( the depth of field is much greater than with a DSLR, so the increased depth of field at the smaller aperture is not missed too much). Manual Mode it is still a very valuable feature for action photography, as it allows you to select the largest aperture and thus get the fastest shutter speed consistent with correct exposure.

iSweep Panorama - Fun and I use it occasionally. It uses the video processing, so the resolution is not that great. Best results in terms of resolution can be obtained by panning holding the camera vertical.

Video - I never use it.

GPS - This has turned out to be useful. Having returned from our holiday in Ireland I found it quite helpful in locating where I was when I took a particular photo. It is also fun to click on the location and have it appear on my computer. I think I could live with out it, but it is a worthwhile feature for me.

Handling - I am happy enough with it, but the LCD could be better in bright light and it could use more pixels. If they could include some sort of viewfinder, without increasing size or weight that would be nice. I find the biggest negative when compared to my previous DSLRs is the lack of a viewfinder. I find that it is harder to compose my pictures and that I crop more often in my post processing.

Body - The body seems of decent quality to me. My main problem, is that I now have some 'stuff' inside my lens and I often have to remove a splotch when post processing. I expect I will send it in to Sony to be cleaned. I love the compact size and weight. It is a little smaller and lighter than the LX3, so it is easier to get in my pocket,

Macro - I am happy with my close-ups. For maximum magnification it appears best to move the lens out from 25mm to about x1.4.

FINAL THOUGHTS - I don't think I will ever go back to a camera that I can't carry in my pocket. There is no other compact currently available that would meet my needs as well. They simply do not have the combination of very wide to strong telephoto, low noise (for a compact), sufficient manual control, and 10 fps.

Here is a link to my Sony HX5 Gallert:

http://www.pbase.com/frank_b/sony_hx5v

_________________
Frank


Last edited by fgbrault on Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Thanks Frank!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
Gordon, would it make sense for you to move my review to either the "Buying a new camera but undecided on brand?" forum or to the "Sony" forum? I think it is not too likely to be seen here. :) Thanks.

Frank

_________________
Frank


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Well, there's two subjects here - one is a travel thread, which should be in the travel forum, and the rest is a user review. I think we'll move it to the user reviews and rename the thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
O.K thanks.

_________________
Frank


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:22 pm
Posts: 120
I mistakenly said Macros are best at 1.4. It should read 2.4

_________________
Frank


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group