Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Fri Sep 19, 2014 11:52 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:02 pm 
I just cant keep up!!

Unitil recently I shot youth football( soccer that is - not the version played by men with odd shaped balls;)) with a basic Olympus E420 and a 70-300 lens. Results were fine. One month ago purchased Canon 7d with 50-250 and results are good. Now been tempted with an offer to shoot first team action and used 50-250 for first shoot. Results still good but plan to get faster lens.

In terms of budget I can afford either Canon 70-200 f4 (c£500) or Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (c£650). I may also add 1.4x and/or 2x.

Comments/advise would be appreciated.

PS
This Action/Sports/Aviation Forum is the business!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8028
Location: UK
Not experienced with either, but I would comment that if you find yourself needing to use a 2x converter, you're better off with a f/2.8 lens as that will retain AF capability where the f/4 wont.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:29 am
Posts: 716
Well, since you're OK with f4 but you'd like more reach, I would say save up for option c) Sigma 100-300mm. If that's absolutely out of the question, since your other two choices cover the same focal length range (actually less) as your current 50-250mm, I would say go for the largest aperture difference. i.e. Sigma f2.8

Mark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 27
Location: Australia
If you can afford the Canon 2.8 then I'd say go for it. I have the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS (not MkII) and it's great.

If you want something a lot lighter and can live without the extra 2/3 stop, get the f/4 IS.

don't recommend using the 1.4x converter with either lens. If you want to do that, get a prime. Just MHO.

_________________
Image

EOS 7D + grip, EOS 40D + grip, EOS 10D + grip
EF-S 10-22mm f:3.5-4.5, EF 17-40mm f:4L, EF-S 60mm f:2.8 Macro, EF 70-200mm f:2.8L IS, EF 300mm f:2.8L, EF 500mm f:4L IS, EF 1.4x Converter II
2x Speedlite 550EX
Manfrotto 190XPROB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:08 am 
The 70-200mm sigma HSM II is very fast when it comes to AF speed. I would get that and a 1.4 TC if I were you. Or the 150-500/50-500 sigma (not very fast though)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:21 am 
I use both the sigma 70-200 2.8, and sigma 100-300 f4 to shoot my kids playing rugby league, actually I haven't used the 300 with the kids games yet as I purchased it just after the end of the season, but I did hire a sigma 120-300 2.8 a couple of times, and for me 300mm was enough, the 200 was great with the youngest son as they were still on the half fields, but it was a bit short with my eldest as they were playing on full fields, 2.8 does come in handy when the light gets low/bad, but f4 was still OK, that's why I sold my 100-400 and bought the 100-300, for me, the extra stop was worth more than IS and an extra 100mm.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group