After looking at some first shots, my mindset is as follows:
I'm still undecided
sounds good, but it's pretty close to the 50/1.4G. And I'm still on the 35/2.0D.
A nice walk-around combo would be a new 35/1.4G with the 85/1.4G - but that would surely make my 50/1.4G collecting dust on the shelf ::)
On the other hand there is the 24/1.4G which would be a nice complement to the 50/1.4G. But as I'm aiming to convert to FX soon(er or later) I'm not sure how much I would really need the 24/1.4G. I think my wide-angle needs are very well covered by my 14-24/2.8 then.
So Nikon: bring on the new 35/1.4G and I'll think about the 85/1.4G too.
(2) As to the super 11x FX-zoom
: I own and love the 18-200 on my D300 still as in some situations I just mount it and I'm done. Being a cheapo I still think that with a new higher res FX body (a'la D700x with 16-18MP) I would be happy to use the 18-200 in DX-mode before investing another 1000€ in another Jack-of-all-trades.
(3) Regarding the 24-120
, again: if results are mediocre at best, I'm already covered. If there is a surprise after professionally testing the lens I might reconsider, because 24mm on FX is normally wide enough for my purposes and 120mm is not too shabby either
(4) The DX 55-300 zoom
: no thanks: I'm not going to invest in DX-lenses any more
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Pictures
, My Photography Blog