Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2014 10:07 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 12:23 pm 
I'm looking to upgrade my from my Acer Aspire 5920G to something a little more beefy and suitable for photo editing. I've found that a lot of the photos I shoot these days get processed in DXO which is far from being the fastest RAW converter, so a fast CPU is a necessity.

I'm looking for a laptop that has the following:
15" or 17" screen, 1920x1080 resolution
Core i5 or i7 CPU
Decent GPU
4 GB RAM
500+GB hard drive

I've found a Dell XPS 16" that looks like it fits the bill for £999. http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/produ ... &cs=ukdhs1

I'm looking for recommendations of any other laptops that I should be looking at.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:09 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Dell's support service in Denmark is rubbish but i don't know about the UK…
I love my new MacBook Pro and it is fast as he** It open up Photoshop CS5 in 4 sec!
The 15.4" does not have a 1920x1080. 1440x900 as standard and an optional 1680x1050. The 17" = 1920x1080
I know it is very pricy, but I would defiantly recommend it!

_________________

Victor
Website


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:09 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
What about a Sony Vaio F Series?

_________________

Victor
Website


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
Sony Vaios are great laptops, but they are mighty expensive. I personally like Dell, and they have some good offers.

I would skip the i7, and go for the i5 processor. You pay a 50% premium for a 10% increase in speed, so to say. Put the saved money towards a nice SSD, and buy an external eSata harddrive to store images you're done with. Don't forget to check the laptop for esata compatibility though :)

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 5:06 pm 
The Macbooks are nice, but IMHO they are too pricey for me and I'd struggle to justify it. Same with the Sony Vaio's.

As for the i7 vs i5, I'd value the i7 because of the integrated memory controller and the actual quad core support. Remember my main reason for wanting an upgrade is to run DXO properly and having 4 cores (8 with HT) means that I can batch process 8 images at once. Compared to my current dual core setup, this is a quadrupling in productivity!

I'm keen to see if there are alternative to the Dell as IMHO it looks like a very good deal, but then again I've been so far out of the loop when it comes to hardware that I'd be wary of my judgment in these matters.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8022
Location: UK
i5 also has IMC doesn't it? It's just a cut down i7. Doesn't have the HT but I'm not sure how much that really gains you anyway as usually other bottlenecks will creep up first. In the P4 days HT got a maximum of 50% more throughput than without, but that was under best case situations. Typically it was much less and I wouldn't worry about it.

Work uses Dells as standard and I find their design unremarkable. How about another Acer? I can't suggest any specific model though as I'm also out of the loop... I have got two and a half of the things now (one laptop bought without screen). They seem to do well generally on value.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:07 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Taiwan / Sweden / Scotland
You could pick Asus laptops as well, they perform nicely and also nice design too..

Or you could pick Acer Asipire TimelineX series (I picked 3820TG, awesome notebook)

If you want to check out a detailed notebook review site, go to www.notebookcheck.com

Acer Aspire TimelineX 3820TG Spec:

Screen size: 13,3"
CPU: Intel i5 430M 2,22Ghz (with HT)
RAM: 4GB DDR3 1066Mhz
HDD: 640GB SATA
Graphics: ATI Mobility Radeon HD5650 1GB GDDR3
Switchable Graphics: Yes
Battery 6 Cell / 9 Cell: 8hr / 12hr
Weight: 6 Cell / 9 Cell: 1,8kg / 1,97kg

Price: 8990 SEK (9 Cell price)

_________________
http://www.AnderssonPhoto.com
Equipment: A blend of Canon, Nikon, Yashica, Leica, Voigtlander, Samyang and Sigma. All of which you can see on my website!
Wishlist: Leica M 240, Summilux 50 ASPH, Summilux 24 ASPH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 8:07 am 
I don't know if you factored it into the price but the Dell has that RGB LED screen which is supposed to be among the best you can get in a notebook. Would be nice to have I think. Is battery life a concern? The quad core i7s perform quite poorly in that area.

Have you considered the HP Envy? Specs are about the same but the price seems to vary a lot outside the US. It is a lot smaller than the XPS 16.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 8:46 am 
Thanks for the suggestions.

Battery life isn't really too much of a concern. I'm satisfied if it does 2 - 3 hours on a single charge. It would be nice if there was a 10 hour Core i7 laptop, but I don't think that's realistic at this time :). I saw the RGB LED thing, but wasn't sure what it meant. Good to know that the screen is going to be fantastic for photo editing. This all really weighs in favour of the Dell. I'll continue looking as I'm in no immediate hurry to buy as my current laptop still works, albeit slowly.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:31 am 
Well the RGD LED screen is an option, I'm not sure if you get to choose anything else if you go with the 1920x1080 screen. Basically it's got one LED for each colour channel instead of a single white LED that most other LED backlit laptops use. To be honest I've never seen one in practice but the test results look good and impressions sound good too.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 5:31 pm 
Acer appear to have done what Apple said was impossible. See the Acer Aspire 3820TG. Core i5, dedicated ATI graphics card, 13.3" form factor and a battery life of 8 hours. And it's still cheaper than the Macbook :D.

Suddenly I'm not so sure about the Dell XPS 16".


Top
  
 
 Post subject: shoes
PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:34 am 
Just because someone doesn‘t love you the way you want them to, doesn‘t mean they don‘t love you with all they have. 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:51 am 
I have an Acer 3820TG and in all fairness, the screen is not fantastic as it's not only incredibly glossy, but you're of course stuck with 1366x768 resolution. It's also quite cheaply made, but not terribly so. You'll never get 8h of usable battery life out of it unless you get the extended 9-cell battery, but 5-6h is doable.

If you want something that small, have a look at the HP DV3, or if you have money to burn, the smaller Envy models. Both models are available with a quad core mobile CPU and discrete graphics. The 14.5-inch Envy does have the advantage of being available with a 1600x900 screen, something that is still fairly rare considering its size.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:35 pm 
Just saw this thread pop-up again.

I ended up buying the Acer Aspire 4820TG and I'm not complaining. It's a very decent laptop and it came with the high capacity battery, so I'm enjoying decent battery life.

The Core i5 is a dual core CPU with HT so it appears as a quad core. This was a bit of a bummer as I had mistakenly assumed that the i5 had 4 real cores and no HT instead of 2 cores with HT. Nevertheless, the good news is that I can process 4 images in parallel and each image takes about 30 seconds to process :D. DXO is now usable for large projects!


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group